Johannine Comma and Jean Hardouin

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 00:41, 9 July 2022 by Nick (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ←Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)

Jean Hardouin (1646-1729) refers to the grammatical issues in both verse 7 and 8 several years before Eugenios Voulgaris. This was noted by John Black 1783-1855. Eugenius argued for the Greek reading which contained the comma, but both Hardouin (a Jesuit) and Black were proponents of the Latin text, and attacked the Greek text for being a grammatical mess. The issues pointed out do not apply to the Textus Receptus reading, but to the text with the comma omitted. Hardouin felt that "a verse which re-translated into Latin becomes grammatically correct", in which he exalted the Latin over the Greek. While Black was against the comma, Hardouin defended it.

Jean Hardouin 1 John 5

The pic below is the John Black section and verse 7 and 8 from Jean Hardouin enlarged

From verse 7 section ( 8 is in pic)

"Et tres sunt non tria dixit. Unde etiam verisimile fit, scripsisse Joannem ista Latine: quo in idiomate cum sint Spiritus et Sanguis generis masculini, licuit ei masculino genere numerum exprimere quern efficiunt, etiam cum aqua quae feminei est... Nam si Graece tantum Apostolus scriberet; cum sint et .....et .... neutrius generis, non tres sive .. sed .. sive .. diceret.. ex hac autem observatione intelligeimus, id quod ex aliis locis pariter deprehendimus, editionem Latinam hujus espitolae esse primigeniam, ab ipsomet Joanne Apostolo mira diligentia et accuratione conscriptam, non item Graecam, qualis nunc est ... Latina, prout ea legimus, verba scripserit ipse [Joannes] manu sua, vel ore dictaverit, vel ab amanuensi certe translata ipse probaverit.

Translation:

"And there are three things are not said. And so it is likely the case, to have written to John in Latin: the Spirit and the Blood of the males, which, since they are written in the language, it was allowed to him to express the male gender, the number of which is made up, even when the female is ... For, if the water, which in Greek so great an apostle was to write, since they are of the neuter gender, and ..... and ...., .. not to say that three or .. or .. but .. it will be understood from this observation, that which is from the same time in other places, we discover that the edition of the Latin espitolae of this to be in the original, written by the very same John the Apostle, with a wonderful diligence and accuracy, but not Greek, as it now is ... Latina, in so far as we read, he wrote the words of the [John] the hand of his own, either in direct, he transferred to or from the at least amanuensi approved.

Joannis Harduini e Societate Jesu Commentarius in Novum Testamentum: accedit ejusdem auctoris lucubratio, in cujus prima parte ostenditur Cepham a Paulo reprehensum, Petrum non esse, in altera parte, Joannis Apostoli de Sanctissima Trinitate locus explanatur 1741

Palaeoromaica: Or Historical and Philological Disquisitions, Inquiring: Whether the Helvenistic Style is Not Latin-Greek? by John Black 1822

𝔓¹ · 𝔓² · 𝔓³ · 𝔓⁴ · 𝔓⁵ · 𝔓⁶ · 𝔓⁷ · 𝔓⁸ · 𝔓⁹ · 𝔓¹⁰ · 𝔓¹¹ · 𝔓¹² · 𝔓¹³ · 𝔓¹⁴ · 𝔓¹⁵ · 𝔓¹⁶ · 𝔓¹⁷ · 𝔓¹⁸ · 𝔓¹⁹ · 𝔓²⁰ · 𝔓²¹ · 𝔓²² · 𝔓²³ · 𝔓²⁴ · 𝔓²⁵ · 𝔓²⁶ · 𝔓²⁷ · 𝔓²⁸ · 𝔓²⁹ · 𝔓³⁰ · 𝔓³¹ · 𝔓³² · 𝔓³³ · 𝔓³⁴ · 𝔓³⁵ · 𝔓³⁶ · 𝔓³⁷ · 𝔓³⁸ · 𝔓³⁹ · 𝔓⁴⁰ · 𝔓⁴¹ · 𝔓⁴² · 𝔓⁴³ · 𝔓⁴⁴ · 𝔓⁴⁵ · 𝔓⁴⁶ · 𝔓⁴⁷ · 𝔓⁴⁸ · 𝔓⁴⁹ · 𝔓⁵⁰ · 𝔓⁵¹ · 𝔓⁵² · 𝔓⁵³ · 𝔓⁵⁴ · 𝔓⁵⁵ · 𝔓⁵⁶ · 𝔓⁵⁷ · 𝔓⁵⁸ · 𝔓⁵⁹ · 𝔓⁶⁰ · 𝔓⁶¹ · 𝔓⁶² · 𝔓⁶³ · 𝔓⁶⁴ · 𝔓⁶⁵ · 𝔓⁶⁶ · 𝔓⁶⁷ · 𝔓⁶⁸ · 𝔓⁶⁹ · 𝔓⁷⁰ · 𝔓⁷¹ · 𝔓⁷² · 𝔓⁷³ · 𝔓⁷⁴ · 𝔓⁷⁵ · 𝔓⁷⁶ · 𝔓⁷⁷ · 𝔓⁷⁸ · 𝔓⁷⁹ · 𝔓⁸⁰ · 𝔓⁸¹ · 𝔓⁸² · 𝔓⁸³ · 𝔓⁸⁴ · 𝔓⁸⁵ · 𝔓⁸⁶ · 𝔓⁸⁷ · 𝔓⁸⁸ · 𝔓⁸⁹ · 𝔓⁹⁰ · 𝔓⁹¹ · 𝔓⁹² · 𝔓⁹³ · 𝔓⁹⁴ · 𝔓⁹⁵ · 𝔓⁹⁶ · 𝔓⁹⁷ · 𝔓⁹⁸ · 𝔓⁹⁹ · 𝔓¹⁰⁰ · 𝔓¹⁰¹ · 𝔓¹⁰² · 𝔓¹⁰³ · 𝔓¹⁰⁴ · 𝔓¹⁰⁵ · 𝔓¹⁰⁶ · 𝔓¹⁰⁷ · 𝔓¹⁰⁸ · 𝔓¹⁰⁹ · 𝔓¹¹⁰ · 𝔓¹¹¹ · 𝔓¹¹² · 𝔓¹¹³ · 𝔓¹¹⁴ · 𝔓¹¹⁵ · 𝔓¹¹⁶ · 𝔓¹¹⁷ · 𝔓¹¹⁸ · 𝔓¹¹⁹ · 𝔓¹²⁰ · 𝔓¹²¹ · 𝔓¹²² · 𝔓¹²³ · 𝔓¹²⁴ · 𝔓¹²⁵ · 𝔓¹²⁶ · 𝔓¹²⁷ · 𝔓¹²⁸ · 𝔓¹²⁹ · 𝔓¹³⁰ · 𝔓¹³¹ · 𝔓¹³² · 𝔓¹³³ · 𝔓¹³⁴ · 𝔓¹³⁵ · 𝔓¹³⁶ · 𝔓¹³⁷ · 𝔓¹³⁸ · 𝔓¹³⁹ · 𝔓¹⁴⁰ ·