1 Corinthians 14:34

From Textus Receptus

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
-
'''1 Corinthians 14:34'''    Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
+
{{Verses in 1 Corinthians 14}}
 +
* '''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)|ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Α΄ 14:34]]'''
 +
 
 +
{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}
 +
 
 +
* '''1 Corinthians 14:34'''    Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
 +
 +
{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}
 +
 
 +
*'''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 (TRV)|1 Corinthians 14:34]]'''
 +
 
 +
{{Progressive King James Version}}
 +
 
 +
==Interlinear==
 +
 
 +
==Commentary==
 +
 
 +
==Greek==
 +
 
 +
====Textus Receptus====
 +
 
 +
* [[1514 AD|1514]] {{Template: Complutensian Polyglot Footer}}
 +
<small>''See Also [[1 Corinthians 14:34 Complutensian Polyglot 1514]]''</small>
 +
 
 +
====[[Desiderius Erasmus]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1516 AD|1516]] ([[Desiderius Erasmus|Erasmus]] 1st [[Novum Instrumentum omne]])
 +
* [[1519 AD|1519]] ([[Desiderius Erasmus|Erasmus]] 2nd)
 +
* [[1522 AD|1522]] ([[Desiderius Erasmus|Erasmus]] 3rd [[Novum Testamentum omne]])
 +
* [[1527 AD|1527]] ([[Desiderius Erasmus|Erasmus]] 4th)
 +
* [[1535 AD|1535]] ([[Desiderius Erasmus|Erasmus]] 5th)
 +
 
 +
====Colinæus====
 +
 
 +
* [[1534 AD|1534]] (Colinæus)
 +
 
 +
====Stephanus ([[Robert Estienne]])====
 +
 
 +
* [[1546 AD|1546]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 1st)
 +
* [[1549 AD|1549]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 2nd)
 +
* [[1550 AD|1550]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 3rd - [[Editio Regia]])
 +
* [[1551 AD|1551]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 4th)
 +
 
 +
====[[Theodore Beza]]====
 +
* [[1565 AD|1565]] (Beza 1st)
 +
* [[1565 AD|1565]] (Beza Octavo 1st)
 +
* [[1567 AD|1567]] (Beza Octavo 2nd)
 +
* [[1580 AD|1580]] (Beza Octavo 3rd)
 +
* [[1582 AD|1582]] (Beza 2nd)
 +
* [[1589 AD|1589]] (Beza 3rd)
 +
* [[1590 AD|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
 +
* [[1598 AD|1598]] (Beza 4th)
 +
''See Also [[1 Corinthians 14:34 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza|Beza]])''
 +
* [[1604 AD|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)
 +
 
 +
====Elzevir====
 +
 
 +
* [[1624 AD|1624]] (Elzevir)
 +
* [[1633 AD|1633]] (Elzevir)
 +
* [[1641 AD|1641]] (Elzevir)
 +
 
 +
====Scholz====
 +
 
 +
* [[1841 AD|1841]] ([[Johann Martin Augustin Scholz|Scholz]])
 +
 
 +
====Scrivener====
 +
 
 +
* [[1894 AD|1894]] (? ????? ???T???)
 +
 
 +
====Other Greek====
 +
 
 +
* [[1857 AD|1857]] (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
 +
* (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
 +
* [[1881 AD|1881]] (Westcott & Hort)
 +
* (Greek orthodox Church)
 +
 
 +
==Anglo Saxon Translations==
 +
 
 +
* [[1000 AD|1000]] (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Manuscript 140, Corpus Christi College by Aelfric)
 +
 
 +
* [[1200 AD|1200]] (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Hatton Manuscript 38, Bodleian Library by unknown author)
 +
 
 +
==English Translations==
 +
 
 +
* [[1380 AD|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1395 AD|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1534 AD|1534]] ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1535 AD|1535]] (Coverdale Bible)
 +
 
 +
* [[1539 AD|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1540 AD|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1549 AD|1549]] ([[Matthew's Bible]] - [[John Rogers]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1557 AD|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD|1557]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1560 AD|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition
 +
 
 +
* [[1568 AD|1568]] ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition
 +
 
 +
* [[1582 AD|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD|1582]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1587 AD|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
 +
 
 +
* [[1599 AD|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
 +
 
 +
* [[1611 AD|1611]] ([[King James Version]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1729 AD|1729]] ([[Mace New Testament]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1745 AD|1745]] (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
 +
 
 +
* [[1762 AD|1762]] ([[King James Version]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1769 AD|1769]] ([[King James Version]] - [[Benjamin Blayney]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1770 AD|1770]] (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
 +
 
 +
* [[1790 AD|1790]] (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
 +
 
 +
* [[1795 AD|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
 +
 
 +
* [[1833 AD|1833]] (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1835 AD|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)
 +
 
 +
* [[1849 AD|1849]] ([[Etheridge Translation]] by [[John Etheridge]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1850 AD|1850]] ([[King James Version]] by Committee)
 +
 
 +
* [[1851 AD|1851]] (Murdock Translation)
 +
 
 +
* [[1855 AD|1855]] [[Calvin Bible]] by the [[Calvin Translation Society]]
 +
 
 +
* [[1858 AD|1858]] (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by [[Leicester Sawyer]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1865 AD|1865]] ([[The Emphatic Diaglott]] by [[Benjamin Wilson]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1865 AD|1865]] (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
 +
 
 +
* [[1869 AD|1869]] (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)
 +
 
 +
* [[1873 AD|1873]] ([[King James Version]]) by [[Frederick Scrivener]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1885 AD|1885]] (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
 +
 
 +
* [[1890 AD|1890]] (Darby Version 1890 by [[John Darby]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1898 AD|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1901 AD|1901]] ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1902 AD|1902]] (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
 +
 
 +
* [[1902 AD|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
 +
 
 +
* [[1904 AD|1904]] (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by [[Adolphus Worrell]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1904 AD|1904]] (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
 +
 
 +
* [[1911 AD|1911]] (Syrus Scofield)
 +
 
 +
* [[1912 AD|1912]] (Weymouth New Testament)
 +
 
 +
* [[1918 AD|1918]] (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
 +
 
 +
* [[1923 AD|1923]] (Edgar Goodspeed)
 +
 
 +
* [[1982 AD|1982]] ([[New King James Version]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1984 AD|1984]] ([[New International Version]])
 +
 
 +
* [[1995 AD|1995]] ([[New American Standard Bible]])  (©1995)
 +
 
 +
* [[1999 AD|1999]] ([[American King James Version]])[[AKJV]]
 +
 
 +
* [[2005 AD|2005]] ([[Today’s New International Version]])
 +
 
 +
* ([[BBE]])
 +
* ([[Holman Christian Standard Bible]])
 +
* ([[21st Century King James Version]])
 +
* ([[Common English Bible]])
 +
* ([[GOD’S WORD Translation]])
 +
* ([[Contemporary English Version]])
 +
* ([[New Living Translation]])
 +
* ([[Amplified Bible]])
 +
* ([[The Message]])
 +
* ([[New International Reader's Version]])
 +
* ([[Wycliffe New Testament]])
 +
 
 +
==Foreign Language Versions==
 +
 
 +
====[[Arabic]]====
 +
* لتصمت نساؤكم في الكنائس لانه ليس مأذونا لهنّ ان يتكلمن بل يخضعن كما يقول الناموس ايضا. <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)
 +
 
 +
====[[Aramaic]]====
 +
* <big></big>(Aramaic Peshitta)
 +
 
 +
====[[Basque]]====
 +
 
 +
* Çuen emazteac Elicetan ichilic beude: ecen etzaye permettitzen minçatzera: baina bire suiet, Legueac-ere erraiten duen beçala. 
 +
 
 +
====[[Bulgarian]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1940 AD|1940]] (Bulgarian Bible)
 +
 
 +
====[[Chinese]]====
 +
 
 +
*  1 妇 女 在 会 中 要 闭 口 不 言 , 像 在 圣 徒 的 众 教 会 一 样 , 因 为 不 准 他 们 说 话 。 他 们 总 要 顺 服 , 正 如 律 法 所 说 的 。 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))
 +
 
 +
*  1 婦 女 在 會 中 要 閉 口 不 言 , 像 在 聖 徒 的 眾 教 會 一 樣 , 因 為 不 准 他 們 說 話 。 他 們 總 要 順 服 , 正 如 律 法 所 說 的 。 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))
 +
 
 +
====[[French]]====
 +
 
 +
* Que vos femmes se taisent dans les assemblees, car il ne leur est pas permis de parler; mais qu'elles soient soumises, comme le dit aussi la loi. (French Darby)
 +
 
 +
* [[1744 AD|1744]] Que les femmes qui sont parmi vous se taisent dans les Eglises; car il ne leur est point permis de parler, mais [elles doivent] être soumises, comme aussi la Loi le dit. (Martin 1744)
 +
 
 +
* [[1744 AD|1744]] (Ostervald 1744)
 +
 
 +
====[[German]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1545 AD|1545]] (Luther 1545)
 +
 
 +
* [[1871 AD|1871]] (Elberfelder 1871)
 +
 
 +
* [[1912 AD|1912]] Wie in allen Gemeinden der Heiligen lasset eure Weiber schweigen in der Gemeinde; denn es soll ihnen nicht zugelassen werden, daß sie reden, sondern sie sollen untertan sein, wie auch das Gesetz sagt. (Luther 1912)
 +
 
 +
====[[Italian]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1649 AD|1649]] Tacciansi le vostre donne nelle raunanze della chiesa, perciocchè non è loro permesso di parlare, ma debbono esser soggette, come ancora la legge dice. (Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)
 +
 
 +
* [[1927 AD|1927]] Come si fa in tutte le chiese de’ santi, tacciansi le donne nelle assemblee, perché non è loro permesso di parlare, ma debbon star soggette, come dice anche la legge. (Riveduta Bible 1927)
 +
 
 +
====[[Japanese]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1928 AD|1928]] ([[Naoji Nagai]])
 +
 
 +
====[[Latin]]====
 +
 
 +
* mulieres in ecclesiis taceant non enim permittitur eis loqui sed subditas esse sicut et lex dicit [[Latin Vulgate]]
 +
 
 +
* [[1527 AD|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)
 +
 
 +
* [[1527 AD|1527]] (Erasmus Vulgate 1527)
 +
 
 +
====[[Pidgin]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1996 AD|1996]] (Pidgin King Jems)
 +
 
 +
====[[Romainian]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[2010 AD|2010]] (Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna)
 +
 
 +
====[[Russian]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1876 AD|1876]] Жены ваши в церквах да молчат, ибо не позволено им говорить, а быть в подчинении, как и закон говорит. [[Russian Synodal Version]]
 +
 
 +
Phonetically:
 +
 
 +
====[[Spanish]]====
 +
 
 +
* (RVG Spanish)
 +
 
 +
====[[Swedish]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1917 AD|1917]] Såsom kvinnorna tiga i alla andra de heligas församlingar, så må de ock tiga i edra församlingar. Det är dem icke tillstatt att tala, utan de böra underordna sig, såsom lagen bjuder. (Swedish - Svenska 1917)
 +
 
 +
====[[Tagalog]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1905 AD|1905]] Ang mga babae ay magsitahimik sa mga iglesia: sapagka't sila'y walang kapahintulutang mangagsalita; kundi sila'y pasakop, gaya naman ng sinasabi ng kautusan. (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)
 +
 
 +
====[[Tok Pisin]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1996 AD|1996]] (Tok Pisin King Jems)
 +
 
 +
====[[Vietnamese]]====
 +
 
 +
* [[1934 AD|1934]] đờn bà phải nín lặng trong đám hội của anh em: họ không có phép nói tại nơi đó, nhưng phải phục tùng cũng như luật pháp dạy. (VIET)
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
* [[1 Corinthians 14:34 Timeline]]
 +
 
 +
==External Links==
 +
* [http://www.standardbearers.net/uploads/Ahaziahs_Age_Upon_His_Accession_Chronology_of_the_OT_Dr_Floyd_Nolen_Jones_PhD_ThD.pdf Ahaziahs Age Upon His Accession Chronology of the OT] by Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones
==Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35==
==Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35==
:The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)
:The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)

Revision as of 13:54, 2 August 2016

Template:Verses in 1 Corinthians 14

(Textus Receptus, Novum Testamentum, Theodore Beza, 5th major edition. Geneva. 1598)

  • 1 Corinthians 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

(King James Version, Pure Cambridge Edition 1900)

(King James Version 2016 Edition, 2016)

Contents

Interlinear

Commentary

Greek

Textus Receptus

See Also 1 Corinthians 14:34 Complutensian Polyglot 1514

Desiderius Erasmus

Colinæus

Stephanus (Robert Estienne)

Theodore Beza

See Also 1 Corinthians 14:34 Beza 1598 (Beza)

  • 1604 (Beza Octavo 5th)

Elzevir

Scholz

Scrivener

  • 1894 (? ????? ???T???)

Other Greek

  • 1857 (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
  • (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
  • 1881 (Westcott & Hort)
  • (Greek orthodox Church)

Anglo Saxon Translations

  • 1000 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Manuscript 140, Corpus Christi College by Aelfric)
  • 1200 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Hatton Manuscript 38, Bodleian Library by unknown author)

English Translations

  • 1535 (Coverdale Bible)
  • 1745 (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
  • 1770 (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
  • 1790 (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
  • 1795 (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
  • 1835 (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)
  • 1851 (Murdock Translation)
  • 1865 (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
  • 1869 (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)
  • 1885 (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
  • 1902 (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
  • 1902 (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
  • 1904 (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
  • 1911 (Syrus Scofield)
  • 1912 (Weymouth New Testament)
  • 1918 (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
  • 1923 (Edgar Goodspeed)

Foreign Language Versions

Arabic

  • لتصمت نساؤكم في الكنائس لانه ليس مأذونا لهنّ ان يتكلمن بل يخضعن كما يقول الناموس ايضا. (Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

Aramaic

  • (Aramaic Peshitta)

Basque

  • Çuen emazteac Elicetan ichilic beude: ecen etzaye permettitzen minçatzera: baina bire suiet, Legueac-ere erraiten duen beçala.

Bulgarian

  • 1940 (Bulgarian Bible)

Chinese

  • 1 妇 女 在 会 中 要 闭 口 不 言 , 像 在 圣 徒 的 众 教 会 一 样 , 因 为 不 准 他 们 说 话 。 他 们 总 要 顺 服 , 正 如 律 法 所 说 的 。 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))
  • 1 婦 女 在 會 中 要 閉 口 不 言 , 像 在 聖 徒 的 眾 教 會 一 樣 , 因 為 不 准 他 們 說 話 。 他 們 總 要 順 服 , 正 如 律 法 所 說 的 。 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))

French

  • Que vos femmes se taisent dans les assemblees, car il ne leur est pas permis de parler; mais qu'elles soient soumises, comme le dit aussi la loi. (French Darby)
  • 1744 Que les femmes qui sont parmi vous se taisent dans les Eglises; car il ne leur est point permis de parler, mais [elles doivent] être soumises, comme aussi la Loi le dit. (Martin 1744)
  • 1744 (Ostervald 1744)

German

  • 1545 (Luther 1545)
  • 1871 (Elberfelder 1871)
  • 1912 Wie in allen Gemeinden der Heiligen lasset eure Weiber schweigen in der Gemeinde; denn es soll ihnen nicht zugelassen werden, daß sie reden, sondern sie sollen untertan sein, wie auch das Gesetz sagt. (Luther 1912)

Italian

  • 1649 Tacciansi le vostre donne nelle raunanze della chiesa, perciocchè non è loro permesso di parlare, ma debbono esser soggette, come ancora la legge dice. (Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)
  • 1927 Come si fa in tutte le chiese de’ santi, tacciansi le donne nelle assemblee, perché non è loro permesso di parlare, ma debbon star soggette, come dice anche la legge. (Riveduta Bible 1927)

Japanese

Latin

  • mulieres in ecclesiis taceant non enim permittitur eis loqui sed subditas esse sicut et lex dicit Latin Vulgate
  • 1527 (Erasmus 1527)
  • 1527 (Erasmus Vulgate 1527)

Pidgin

  • 1996 (Pidgin King Jems)

Romainian

  • 2010 (Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna)

Russian

  • 1876 Жены ваши в церквах да молчат, ибо не позволено им говорить, а быть в подчинении, как и закон говорит. Russian Synodal Version

Phonetically:

Spanish

  • (RVG Spanish)

Swedish

  • 1917 Såsom kvinnorna tiga i alla andra de heligas församlingar, så må de ock tiga i edra församlingar. Det är dem icke tillstatt att tala, utan de böra underordna sig, såsom lagen bjuder. (Swedish - Svenska 1917)

Tagalog

  • 1905 Ang mga babae ay magsitahimik sa mga iglesia: sapagka't sila'y walang kapahintulutang mangagsalita; kundi sila'y pasakop, gaya naman ng sinasabi ng kautusan. (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)

Tok Pisin

  • 1996 (Tok Pisin King Jems)

Vietnamese

  • 1934 đờn bà phải nín lặng trong đám hội của anh em: họ không có phép nói tại nơi đó, nhưng phải phục tùng cũng như luật pháp dạy. (VIET)

See Also

External Links

Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35

The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)
Personal tools