Romans 7:7

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 12:04, 21 July 2013 by Beza 1598 (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
  • ΠΡΟΣ ΡΩΜΑΙΟΥΣ 7:7 Τί οὖν ἐροῦμεν ὁ νόμος ἁμαρτία μὴ γένοιτο· ἀλλὰ τὴν ἁμαρτίαν οὐκ ἔγνων εἰ μὴ διὰ νόμου· τήν τε γὰρ ἐπιθυμίαν οὐκ ᾔδειν εἰ μὴ ὁ νόμος ἔλεγεν Οὐκ ἐπιθυμήσεις

(Textus Receptus, Theodore Beza, 1598)

  • Romans 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

(King James Version, Pure Cambridge Edition 1900)

  • Romans 7:7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. Because I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.”

(Textus Receptus Version)

Contents

Interlinear

Commentary

Greek

Textus Receptus

Desiderius Erasmus

Colinæus

Stephanus (Robert Estienne)

Theodore Beza

See Also Matthew 1:1 Beza 1598 (Beza)

  • 1604 (Beza Octavo 5th)

Elzevir

Scholz

Scrivener

  • 1894 (? ????? ???T???)

Other Greek

  • 1857 (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
  • (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
  • 1881 (Westcott & Hort)
  • (Greek orthodox Church)

Anglo Saxon Translations

  • 1000 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Manuscript 140, Corpus Christi College by Aelfric)
  • 1200 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Hatton Manuscript 38, Bodleian Library by unknown author)

English Translations

  • 1395 What therfor schulen we seie? The lawe is synne? God forbede. But Y knew not synne, but bi lawe; for Y wiste not that coueitynge was synne, but for the lawe seide, Thou schalt not coueyte. (Wyclif's Bible by John Wycliffe)
  • 1534 What shall we saye then? is ye lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meant but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant excepte the lawe had sayde thou shalt not lust. (Tyndale Bible by William Tyndale)
  • 1535 What shal we saye then? Is the lawe synne? God forbyd: Neuertheles I knewe not synne, but by ye lawe. For I had knowne nothinge of lust, yf the lawe had not sayde: Thou shalt not lust. (Coverdale Bible)
  • 1540 What shall we saye then? is the lawe synne? God forbyd: neuertheles I knew not synne, but by the lawe. For I had not knowne what lust had meant, excepte the lawe had sayd, þu shalt not lust. (Great Bible Second Edition - Miles Coverdale)
  • 1549 What shall we saye then? Is the lawe synne? God forbid: but I knewe not what synne meante but by the law. For I had not knowne what luste had meant, except the lawe had sayed, thou shalte, not lust. (Matthew's Bible - John Rogers)
  • 1568 What shall we say then? Is the lawe sinne? God forbyd. Neuerthelesse, I knewe not sinne, but by the lawe: For I had not knowen lust, except the lawe had sayde, thou shalt not lust. (Bishop's Bible First Edition
  • 1587 What shall we say then? Is the Lawe sinne? God forbid. Nay, I knewe not sinne, but by the Lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Lawe had sayd, Thou shalt not lust. (Geneva Bible) by William Whittingham
  • 1611 What shall wee say then? is the law sinne? God forbid. Nay, I had not knowen sinne, but by the lawe: for I had not knowen lust, except the Law had said, Thou shalt not couet. (King James Version)
  • 1729 Do we then conclude, that the law is the cause of sin? by no means; but I should not have had such a notion of sin, had it not been for the law: for I should not have known concupiscence was a sin, unless the law had said, "thou shalt not covet." (Mace New Testament)
  • 1745 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
  • 1769 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (King James Version - Benjamin Blayney)
  • 1770 What shall we say then? is the law sin? God forbid! Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust to be sinful, if the law had not said, "Thou shalt not covet." (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
  • 1790 What shall we say then? That the law is sin? God forbid. Yea, I should not have known sin, but for the law. I had not known lust, unless the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
  • 1795 What then shall we say? Is the law sin? God forbid. Yea, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not even known concupiscence, unless the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
  • 1833 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. No, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (Webster Version - by Noah Webster)
  • 1835 What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? By no means. Indeed, I had not known sin, except by the law. For I had not known even inordinate desire, unless the law had said, "You shall not lust." (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)
  • 1849 What then, say we the law is sin? Not so. But sin I had not learned (to know) but by the law: for I had not known concupiscence (to be sinful), but (by) the law, which hath said, Thou shalt not covet. (Etheridge Translation by John Etheridge)
  • 1851 What shall we say then ? Is the law sin ?, Far be it. For I had not learned sin, except by means of the law: for I had not known concupiscence, had not the law said, Thou shalt not covet: (Murdock Translation)
  • 1858 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? By no means. On the contrary I knew not sin except through the law; for I had not known inordinate desire, unless the law had said, You shall not desire inordinately. (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by Leicester Sawyer)
  • 1865 What then shall we say? the law sin? Not let it be; but the sin not I knew, if not through law; the even for strong desire not I knew, if not the law said: Not thou shalt lust. (The Emphatic Diaglott by Benjamin Wilson)
  • 1865 What then shall we say? Is the law sin? Far be it! But I had not known sin, except through law; for I had not known coveting, if the law had not said: Thou shalt not covet. (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
  • 1869 What then shall we say? Is the Law sin? God forbid! But I should not have known sin, except by the Law; for I should not have known sinful desire, unless the Law had said, "Thou shalt not covet." (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)
  • 1873 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. (King James Version) by Frederick Scrivener)
  • 1885 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet: (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
  • 1890 What shall we say then? [is] the law sin? Far be the thought. But I had not known sin, unless by law: for I had not had conscience also of lust unless the law had said, Thou shalt not lust; (Darby Version 1890 by John Darby)
  • 1898 What, then, shall we say? the law `is' sin? let it not be! but the sin I did not know except through law, for also the covetousness I had not known if the law had not said: (Young's Literal Translation by Robert Young)
  • 1901 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Howbeit, I had not known sin, except through the law: for I had not known coveting, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet: (American Standard Version - Philip Schaff)
  • 1902 What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Far be it! On the contrary, I had not discovered, sin, save through law, for even, of coveting, I had not been aware if, the law, had not kept on saying––Thou shall not covet; (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
  • 1902 Then what shall we say? is the law sin? It could not be so; but I did not know sin except through the law: for indeed I had not known lusts, unless the law said, Thou shalt not covet. (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
  • 1904 What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? It could not be! But I had not known sin, except through law; for I would not know even coveting, if the law did not say, "You shall not covet;" (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by Adolphus Worrell)
  • 1904 What are we to say, then? That Law and sin are the same thing? Heaven forbid! On the contrary, I should not have learnt what sin is, had not it been for Law. If the Law did not say 'Thou shalt not covet,' I should not know what it is to covet. (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
  • 1911 (Syrus Scofield)
  • 1912 (Weymouth New Testament)
  • 1918 What, then, shall we say? Is the law sin? Let it not be; but I had not known sin except through law; for I had not known desire unless the law had said: Thou shalt not desire. (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
  • 1923 (Edgar Goodspeed)
  • 1984 What shall we say, then? Is the law sinful? Certainly not! Nevertheless, I would not have known what sin was had it not been for the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, “You shall not covet.” (New International Version)
  • 1995 What shall we say then? Is the Law sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have come to know sin except through the Law; for I would not have known about coveting if the Law had not said, “You shall not covet.” (New American Standard Bible) (©1995)
  • (BBE)
  • What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet. (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
  • What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid! Nay, I would not have known sin, but through the law; for I would not have known lust, except that the law had said, “Thou shalt not covet.” (21st Century King James Version)
  • So what are we going to say? That the Law is sin? Absolutely not! But I wouldn’t have known sin except through the Law. I wouldn’t have known the desire for what others have if the Law had not said, Don’t desire what others have. (Common English Bible)
  • What should we say, then? Are the laws in Moses’ Teachings sinful? That’s unthinkable! In fact, I wouldn’t have recognized sin if those laws hadn’t shown it to me. For example, I wouldn’t have known that some desires are sinful if Moses’ Teachings hadn’t said, “Never have wrong desires.” (GOD’S WORD Translation)
  • Does this mean that the Law is sinful? Certainly not! But if it had not been for the Law, I would not have known what sin is really like. For example, I would not have known what it means to want something that belongs to someone else, unless the Law had told me not to do that. (Contemporary English Version)
  • Well then, am I suggesting that the law of God is sinful? Of course not! In fact, it was the law that showed me my sin. I would never have known that coveting is wrong if the law had not said, “You must not covet.” (New Living Translation)
  • What then do we conclude? Is the Law identical with sin? Certainly not! Nevertheless, if it had not been for the Law, I should not have recognized sin or have known its meaning. [For instance] I would not have known about covetousness [would have had no consciousness of sin or sense of guilt] if the Law had not [repeatedly] said, You shall not covet and have an evil desire [for one thing and another]. (Amplified Bible)
  • But I can hear you say, “If the law code was as bad as all that, it’s no better than sin itself.” That’s certainly not true. The law code had a perfectly legitimate function. Without its clear guidelines for right and wrong, moral behavior would be mostly guesswork. Apart from the succinct, surgical command, “You shall not covet,” I could have dressed covetousness up to look like a virtue and ruined my life with it. (The Message)
  • What should we say then? That the law is sin? Not at all! I wouldn’t have known what sin was unless the law had told me. The law said, “Do not want what belongs to other people.” If the law hadn’t said that, I would not have known what it was like to want what belonged to others.(New International Reader's Version)
  • (Wycliffe New Testament)

Foreign Language Versions

Arabic

  • (Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

Aramaic

  • (Aramaic Peshitta)

Basque

Bulgarian

  • 1940 (Bulgarian Bible)

Chinese

  • 1 这 样 ， 我 们 可 说 甚 麽 呢 ？ 律 法 是 罪 麽 ？ 断 乎 不 是 ！ 只 是 非 因 律 法 ， 我 就 不 知 何 为 罪 。 非 律 法 说 不 可 起 贪 心 ， 我 就 不 知 何 为 贪 心 。 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))
  • 1 這 樣 ， 我 們 可 說 甚 麼 呢 ？ 律 法 是 罪 麼 ？ 斷 乎 不 是 ！ 只 是 非 因 律 法 ， 我 就 不 知 何 為 罪 。 非 律 法 說 不 可 起 貪 心 ， 我 就 不 知 何 為 貪 心 。 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))

French

  • Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle péché? -Qu'ainsi n'advienne! Mais je n'eusse pas connu le péché, si ce n'eût été par la loi; car je n'eusse pas eu conscience de la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: "Tu ne convoiteras point". (French Darby)
  • 1744 Que dirons-nous donc? La Loi est-elle péché? à Dieu ne plaise! au contraire je n'ai point connu le péché, sinon par la Loi : car je n'eusse pas connu la convoitise, si la Loi n'eût dit : tu ne convoiteras point. (Martin 1744)
  • 1744 Que dirons-nous donc? La loi est-elle la cause du péché? Nullement! Au contraire, je n'ai connu le péché que par la loi; car je n'eusse point connu la convoitise, si la loi n'eût dit: Tu ne convoiteras point. (Ostervald 1744)

German

  • 1545 Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht ohne durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: Laß dich nicht gelüsten! (Luther 1545)
  • 1871 Was sollen wir nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde hätte ich nicht erkannt, als nur durch Gesetz. Denn auch von der Lust hätte ich nichts gewußt, wenn nicht das Gesetz gesagt hätte: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten". (Elberfelder 1871)
  • 1912 Was wollen wir denn nun sagen? Ist das Gesetz Sünde? Das sei ferne! Aber die Sünde erkannte ich nicht, außer durchs Gesetz. Denn ich wußte nichts von der Lust, wo das Gesetz nicht hätte gesagt: "Laß dich nicht gelüsten!" (Luther 1912)

Italian

  • 1649 Che diremo adunque? che la legge sia peccato? Così non sia; anzi, io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per la legge; perciocchè io non avrei conosciuta la concupiscenza, se la legge non dicesse: Non concupire.(Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)
  • 1927 Che diremo dunque? La legge è essa peccato? Così non sia; anzi io non avrei conosciuto il peccato, se non per mezzo della legge; poiché io non avrei conosciuto la concupiscenza, se la legge non avesse detto: Non concupire. (Riveduta Bible 1927)

Japanese

Latin

  • 1527 (Erasmus 1527)
  • 1527 (Erasmus Vulgate 1527)

Pidgin

  • 1996 (Pidgin King Jems)

Romainian

  • 2010 Deci ce vom zice? Legea este ceva păcătos? Nici de cum! Dimpotrivă, păcatul nu l-am cunoscut decît prin Lege. De pildă, n'aş fi cunoscut pofta, dacă Legea nu mi-ar fi spus: ,,Să nu pofteşti!`` (Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna)

Russian

  • 1876 Что же скажем? Неужели от закона грех? Никак. Но я не иначе узнал грех, как посредством закона. Ибо яне понимал бы и пожелания, если бы закон не говорил: не пожелай. Russian Synodal Version

Phonetically:

Spanish

  • ¿Qué pues diremos? ¿La ley es pecado? En ninguna manera. Empero yo no conocí el pecado sino por la ley: porque tampoco conociera la concupiscencia, si la ley no dijera: No codiciarás. (RVG Spanish)

Swedish

  • 1917 Vad skola vi då säga? Är lagen synd? Bort det! Men synden skulle jag icke hava lärt känna, om icke genom lagen; ty jag hade icke vetat av begärelsen, om icke lagen hade sagt: »Du skall icke hava begärelse.» (Swedish - Svenska 1917)

Tagalog

  • 1905 Ano nga ang ating sasabihin? Ang kautusan baga'y kasalanan? Huwag nawang mangyari. Datapuwa't, hindi ko sana nakilala ang kasalanan, kundi sa pamamagitan ng kautusan: sapagka't hindi ko sana nakilala ang kasakiman, kung hindi sinasabi ng kautusan, Huwag kang mananakim: (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)

Tok Pisin

  • 1996 (Tok Pisin King Jems)

Vietnamese

  • 1934 Vậy chúng ta sẽ nói làm sao? Luật pháp há là tội lỗi sao? Chẳng hề như vậy! Nhưng tôi chỉ bởi luật pháp mà biết tội lỗi; vì nếu luật pháp không nói: Người chớ tham lam, thì tôi đã không biết sự tham lam. (VIET)

See Also

External Links

Retrieved from "https://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Romans_7:7"
Personal tools