Hebrews 7:11

From Textus Receptus

Revision as of 06:48, 9 May 2015 by Beza 1598 (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
  • ΠΡΟΣ ΕΒΡΑΙΟΥΣ 7:11 Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ' αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι

(Textus Receptus, Theodore Beza, 1598)

  • Hebrews 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

(King James Version, Pure Cambridge Edition 1900)

  • Hebrews 7:11 Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (because under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?

(Textus Receptus Version)

Contents

Interlinear

Commentary

Greek

Textus Receptus

Desiderius Erasmus

Colinæus

Stephanus (Robert Estienne)

Theodore Beza

See Also Matthew 1:1 Beza 1598 (Beza)

  • 1604 (Beza Octavo 5th)

Elzevir

Scholz

Scrivener

  • 1894 (? ????? ???T???)

Other Greek

  • 1857 (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
  • (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
  • 1881 (Westcott & Hort)
  • (Greek orthodox Church)

Anglo Saxon Translations

  • 1000 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Manuscript 140, Corpus Christi College by Aelfric)
  • 1200 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Hatton Manuscript 38, Bodleian Library by unknown author)

English Translations

  • 1395 Therfor if perfeccioun was bi the preesthood of Leuy, for vndur hym the puple took the lawe, what yit was it nedeful, another preest to rise, bi the ordre of Melchisedech, and not to be seid bi the ordre of Aaron? (Wyclif's Bible by John Wycliffe)
  • 1534 Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of Melchisedech and not after the order of Aaron? (Tyndale Bible by William Tyndale)
  • 1535 Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthode of the Leuites (for vnder the same (presthode) the people receaued the lawe) what neded it then furthurmore, that another prest shulde ryse after the order of Melchisedech, and not after the order of Aaron? (Coverdale Bible)
  • 1540 If now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of þe Leuytes (for vnder that presthod the people receaued the lawe) what neded it furthermore, that another prest shuld ryse to be called after the order of Melchisedech, and not after the order of Aaron? (Great Bible Second Edition - Miles Coverdale)
  • 1549 Yf nowe therfore perfeccyon came by the priesthode of the Leuytes (for vnder that presthode the people receyueth the lawe) what nedeth furthermore that another prieste shoulde aryse after the ordre of Melchisedech, and not after the ordre of Aaron? (Matthew's Bible - John Rogers)
  • 1568 If therefore perfection was by the priesthood of ye Leuites (For vnder that priesthood the people receaued the law) what neded it furthermore that another priest shoulde rise after the order of Melchisedech, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? (Bishop's Bible First Edition
  • 1587 If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? (Geneva Bible) by William Whittingham
  • 1611 If therefore perfection were by the Leuiticall Priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the Law) what further neede was there, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of Aaron? (King James Version)
  • 1729 If therefore the Levitical priesthood, concerning which the people received a law, could have given perfection, what further need was there that another priest should rise, to be named after the order of Melchisedec, and not after the order of Aaron? (Mace New Testament)
  • 1745 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for under it the people received the law, what further need that another priest should rise after the order Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
  • 1769 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (King James Version - Benjamin Blayney)
  • 1770 Now if perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law) what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not after the order of Aaron? (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
  • 1790 Now if perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what farther need was there that another priest should rise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
  • 1795 If therefore there was perfection by the Levitical priesthood (for under that the people had the law given to them), what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
  • 1833 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Webster Version - by Noah Webster)
  • 1835 Moreover, if, indeed, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood, (for with it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should arise, according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)
  • 1849 If, therefore, Perfection were to be through the priesthood of the Levoyee, by which the law has been put upon the people, why was there another Priest required, who should arise in the resemblance of Malki-Zedek? For he had said, In the likeness of Aharun he shall be. (Etheridge Translation by John Etheridge)
  • 1851 (Murdock Translation)
  • 1858 If therefore there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood,--for the people received the law under it,--what need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec and not to be called after the order of Aaron? (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by Leicester Sawyer)
  • 1865 If indeed then perfection through the Levitical priesthood was; (the people for with her law had received;) what yet need, according to the order of Melchizedek another to arise a priest, and not according to the order of Aaron to be named? (The Emphatic Diaglott by Benjamin Wilson)
  • 1865 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there that a different priest should arise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
  • 1869 If indeed perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people hath received the Law,) what further need was there that a different priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called alter the order of Aaron? (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)
  • 1873 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (King James Version) by Frederick Scrivener)
  • 1885 Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need [was there] that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
  • 1890 If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with it, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron? (Darby Version 1890 by John Darby)
  • 1898 If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood -- for the people under it had received law -- what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron? (Young's Literal Translation by Robert Young)
  • 1901 Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need `was there' that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? (American Standard Version - Philip Schaff)
  • 1902 If indeed, therefore, there had been, a perfecting through means of the Levitical priesthood,––for, the people, thereon, have had based a code of laws, what further need, according to the rank of Melchizedek, for a different priest to be raised up, and, not according to the rank of Aaron, to be designated? (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
  • 1902 Then indeed if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for unto it the people have been tithed, what need is there still that another priest shall rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
  • 1904 If, therefore, there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there, that another Priest should arise according to the rank of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned according to the rank of Aaron? (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by Adolphus Worrell)
  • 1904 If, then, Perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood—and it was under this priesthood that the people received the Law—why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron? (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
  • 1911 (Syrus Scofield)
  • 1912 Now if the crowning blessing was attainable by means of the Levitical priesthood—for as resting on this foundation the people received the Law, to which they are still subject— what further need was there for a Priest of a different kind to be raised up belonging to the order of Melchizedek instead of being said to belong to the order of Aaron? (Weymouth New Testament)
  • 1918 If indeed, then, perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for upon it the people received the law, what further need that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
  • 1923 (Edgar Goodspeed)

Foreign Language Versions

Arabic

  • فلو كان بالكهنوت اللاوي كمال. اذ الشعب اخذ الناموس عليه. ماذا كانت الحاجة بعد الى ان يقوم كاهن آخر على رتبة ملكي صادق ولا يقال على رتبة هرون. (Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

Aramaic

  • ܐܠܘ ܗܟܝܠ ܓܡܝܪܘܬܐ ܒܝܕ ܟܘܡܪܘܬܐ ܕܠܘܝܐ ܐܝܬܝܗ ܗܘܬ ܕܒܗ ܤܝV ܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܥܡܐ ܠܡܢܐ ܡܬܒܥܐ ܗܘܐ ܟܘܡܪܐ ܐܚܪܢܐ ܕܢܩܘV ܒܕܡܘܬܗ ܕܡܠܟܝܙܕܩ ܐܡܪ ܕܝܢ ܕܒܕܡܘܬܗ ܕܐܗܪܘܢ ܢܗܘܐ (Aramaic Peshitta)

Basque

  • Beraz baldin perfectionea Sacrificadoregoa Leuiticoan içan baliz (ecen populuac Leguea haren azpian recebitu vkan du) cer behar cen goitiric berce Sacrificadorebat Melchisedech-en façoinera altcha ledin, eta ezladin Aaronen façoinera erran?

Bulgarian

  • 1940 Прочее, ако би имало съвършенство чрез левитското свещенство (защото под него людете получиха закона), каква нужда [е имало] вече да се издигне друг свещеник, според Мелхиседековия чин, и да се не счита според Аароновия чин? (Bulgarian Bible)

Chinese

  • 1 从 前 百 姓 在 利 未 人 祭 司 职 任 以 下 受 律 法 ， 倘 若 藉 这 职 任 能 得 完 全 ， 又 何 用 另 外 兴 起 一 位 祭 司 ， 照 麦 基 洗 德 的 等 次 ， 不 照 亚 伦 的 等 次 呢 ？ (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))
  • 1 從 前 百 姓 在 利 未 人 祭 司 職 任 以 下 受 律 法 ， 倘 若 藉 這 職 任 能 得 完 全 ， 又 何 用 另 外 興 起 一 位 祭 司 ， 照 麥 基 洗 德 的 等 次 ， 不 照 亞 倫 的 等 次 呢 ？ (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))

French

  • Si donc la perfection était par la sacrificature lévitique, (car c'est en relation avec elle que le peuple a reçu sa loi,) quel besoin était-il encore qu'un autre sacrificateur se levât selon l'ordre de Melchisédec et qui ne fût pas nommé selon l'ordre d'Aaron? (French Darby)
  • 1744 Si donc la perfection s'était trouvée dans la sacrificature Lévitique, (car c'est sous elle que le peuple a reçu la Loi) quel besoin était-il après cela qu'un autre Sacrificateur se levât selon l'ordre de Melchisédec, et qui ne fût point dit selon l'ordre d'Aaron. (Martin 1744)
  • 1744 Si donc la perfection s'était trouvée dans le sacerdoce lévitique (car c'est à celui-ci que se rapporte la loi donnée au peuple), qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il s'élevât un autre Sacrificateur, selon l'ordre de Melchisédec, et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron? (Ostervald 1744)

German

  • 1545 Ist nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen (denn unter demselbigen hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), was ist denn weiter not zu sagen, daß ein anderer Priester aufkommen solle nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons? (Luther 1545)
  • 1871 Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum wäre (denn in Verbindung mit demselben (O. gegründet auf dasselbe) hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), welches Bedürfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde? (Elberfelder 1871)
  • 1912 Ist nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen (denn unter demselben hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), was ist denn weiter not zu sagen, daß ein anderer Priester aufkommen solle nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons? (Luther 1912)

Italian

  • 1649 Se adunque la perfezione era per il sacerdozio levitico poichè in su quello fu data la legge al popolo, che era egli più bisogno che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l’ordine di Melchisedec, e che non fosse nominato secondo l’ordine d’Aaronne?(Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)
  • 1927 Ora, se la perfezione fosse stata possibile per mezzo del sacerdozio levitico (perché su quello è basata la legge data al popolo), che bisogno c’era ancora che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l’ordine di Melchisedec e non scelto secondo l’ordine d’Aronne? (Riveduta Bible 1927)

Japanese

Latin

  • si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat populus enim sub ipso legem accepit quid adhuc necessarium secundum ordinem Melchisedech alium surgere sacerdotem et non secundum ordinem Aaron dici Latin Vulgate
  • 1527 (Erasmus 1527)
  • 1527 (Erasmus Vulgate 1527)

Pidgin

  • 1996 (Pidgin King Jems)

Romainian

  • 2010 Dacă, dar, desăvîrşirea ar fi fost cu putinţă prin preoţia Leviţilor, -căci supt preoţia aceasta a primit poporul Legea-ce nevoie mai era să se ridice un alt preot ,,după rînduiala lui Melhisedec``, şi nu după rînduiala lui Aaron? (Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna)

Russian

  • 1876 Итак, если бы совершенство достигалось посредством левитского священства, – ибо с ним сопряжен закон народа, – то какая бы еще нужда была восставать иному священнику по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона именоваться? Russian Synodal Version

Phonetically:

Spanish

  • Si pues la perfección era por el sacerdocio Levítico (porque debajo de él recibio el pueblo la ley) ¿qué necesidad había aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melchîsedec, y que no fuese llamado según el orden de Aarón? (RVG Spanish)

Swedish

  • 1917 Vore det nu så, att fullkomning kunde vinnas genom det levitiska prästadömet -- och på detta var ju folkets lagstiftning byggd -- varför hade det då behövts att en präst av annat slag, »efter Melkisedeks sätt», skulle uppstå, en som icke nämnes »efter Arons sätt»? (Swedish - Svenska 1917)

Tagalog

  • 1905 Ngayon kung may kasakdalan nga sa pamamagitan ng pagkasaserdote ng mga Levita (sapagka't sa ilalim nito ay tinanggap ng bayan ang kautusan), anong kailangan pa na magbangon ang ibang saserdote, ayon sa pagkasaserdote ni Melquisedec at hindi ibilang ayon sa pagkasaserdote ni Aaron? (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)

Tok Pisin

  • 1996 (Tok Pisin King Jems)

Vietnamese

  • 1934 Nếu có thể được sự trọn vẹn bởi chức tế lễ của người Lê-vi (vì luật pháp ban cho dân đang khi còn dưới quyền chức tế lễ), thì cớ sao còn cần phải dấy lên một thầy tế lễ khác, lập theo ban Mên-chi-xê-đéc, không theo ban A-rôn? (VIET)

See Also

External Links

Retrieved from "https://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Hebrews_7:11"
Personal tools