User talk:Kiwimac
From Textus Receptus
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: Nick, It is an OPINION that the Amplified Bible is based on Corrupt manuscripts NOT a fact. If you want people to take this site seriously then opinions have no place in the factual pages...) |
Current revision (18:41, 29 May 2009) (view source) (New page: Nick, It is an OPINION that the Amplified Bible is based on Corrupt manuscripts NOT a fact. If you want people to take this site seriously then opinions have no place in the factual pages...) |
Current revision
Nick,
It is an OPINION that the Amplified Bible is based on Corrupt manuscripts NOT a fact. If you want people to take this site seriously then opinions have no place in the factual pages. Set up a separate place for opinion not in the main edits. Please.
