Family Kx
From Textus Receptus
(group prifiles in Luke 10) |
(→Members of the family: 470 and 490) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Members of the family == | == Members of the family == | ||
| - | [[Codex Seidelianus II]], [[Minuscule 2|2]], [[Minuscule 3|3]], [[Minuscule 8|8]], [[Minuscule 14|14]], [[Minuscule 45|45]], [[Minuscule 47|47]], [[Minuscule 49|49]], [[Minuscule 51|51]], [[Minuscule 54|54]], [[Minuscule 56|56]], [[Minuscule 58|58]], [[Minuscule 59|59]], [[Minuscule 60|60]], [[Minuscule 61|61]], [[Minuscule 73|73]], [[Minuscule 75|75]], [[Minuscule 76|76]], [[Minuscule 78|78]], [[Minuscule 84|84]], [[Minuscule 89|89]], [[Minuscule 96|96]], [[Minuscule 99|99]], [[Minuscule 105|105]], [[Minuscule 107|107]], [[Minuscule 109|109]], [[Minuscule 121|121]], [[Minuscule 123|123]], [[Minuscule 126|126]], [[Minuscule 130|130]], [[Minuscule 132|132]], [[Minuscule 133|133]], [[Minuscule 134|134]], [[Minuscule 135|135]], [[Minuscule 140|140]], [[Minuscule 142|142]], [[Minuscule 144|144]], [[Minuscule 145|145]], [[Minuscule 147|147]], [[Minuscule 148|148]], [[Minuscule 149|149]], [[Minuscule 150|150]], [[Minuscule 219|219]], [[Minuscule 272|272]], [[Minuscule 301|301]], [[Minuscule 373|373]], [[Minuscule 358|358]], [[Minuscule 360|360]], [[Minuscule 412|412]], [[Minuscule 439|439]], [[Minuscule 529|529]], [[Minuscule 568|568]], [[Minuscule 778|778]], [[Minuscule 864|864]], [[Minuscule 875|875]], [[Minuscule 877|877]], [[Minuscule 939|939]], [[Minuscule 971|971]], [[Minuscule 1069|1069]], [[Minuscule 1076|1076]], [[Minuscule 1417|1417]], [[Minuscule 1452|1452]], [[Minuscule 1474|1474]], [[Minuscule 1569|1569]], [[Minuscule 1671|1671]], [[Minuscule 1693|1693]], [[Minuscule 2112|2112]], [[Minuscule 2217|2217]], [[Minuscule 1455|2455]], [[Minuscule 2649|2649]].[5] | + | [[Codex Seidelianus II]], [[Minuscule 2|2]], [[Minuscule 3|3]], [[Minuscule 8|8]], [[Minuscule 14|14]], [[Minuscule 45|45]], [[Minuscule 47|47]], [[Minuscule 49|49]], [[Minuscule 51|51]], [[Minuscule 54|54]], [[Minuscule 56|56]], [[Minuscule 58|58]], [[Minuscule 59|59]], [[Minuscule 60|60]], [[Minuscule 61|61]], [[Minuscule 73|73]], [[Minuscule 75|75]], [[Minuscule 76|76]], [[Minuscule 78|78]], [[Minuscule 84|84]], [[Minuscule 89|89]], [[Minuscule 96|96]], [[Minuscule 99|99]], [[Minuscule 105|105]], [[Minuscule 107|107]], [[Minuscule 109|109]], [[Minuscule 121|121]], [[Minuscule 123|123]], [[Minuscule 126|126]], [[Minuscule 130|130]], [[Minuscule 132|132]], [[Minuscule 133|133]], [[Minuscule 134|134]], [[Minuscule 135|135]], [[Minuscule 140|140]], [[Minuscule 142|142]], [[Minuscule 144|144]], [[Minuscule 145|145]], [[Minuscule 147|147]], [[Minuscule 148|148]], [[Minuscule 149|149]], [[Minuscule 150|150]], [[Minuscule 219|219]], [[Minuscule 272|272]], [[Minuscule 301|301]], [[Minuscule 373|373]], [[Minuscule 358|358]], [[Minuscule 360|360]], [[Minuscule 412|412]], [[Minuscule 439|439]], [[Minuscule 470|470]], [[Minuscule 490|490]], [[Minuscule 529|529]], [[Minuscule 568|568]], [[Minuscule 778|778]], [[Minuscule 864|864]], [[Minuscule 875|875]], [[Minuscule 877|877]], [[Minuscule 939|939]], [[Minuscule 971|971]], [[Minuscule 1069|1069]], [[Minuscule 1076|1076]], [[Minuscule 1417|1417]], [[Minuscule 1452|1452]], [[Minuscule 1474|1474]], [[Minuscule 1569|1569]], [[Minuscule 1671|1671]], [[Minuscule 1693|1693]], [[Minuscule 2112|2112]], [[Minuscule 2217|2217]], [[Minuscule 1455|2455]], [[Minuscule 2649|2649]].[5] |
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 19:12, 19 July 2009
Family Kx is a large group of the New Testament manuscripts. It belongs to the Byzantine text-type as one of the textual families of this group. It has no uncials, no early minuscules, it has only hundreds of minuscules.
Contents |
Description
The group was discovered by Hermann von Soden and designated by him with symbol Kx. The only distinction von Soden made among Kx members was according to the presence and type of the Pericope adulterae. Due to the massive influence od the group on other groups and its lack of control, the boundaries of group remain blurred.[3] The most problematic is the question, how many Kx readings can be missing and how many surplus readings can be added before a manuscript no longer deserves to be classified as Kx?[3]
The group profiles of Kx in Luke 1, 10, and 20 proposed by Frederick Wisse are:
- Luke 1:6 — ην του λαου] του λαου ην
- Luke 1:34 — αναστασα δε ] και αναστασα δε ] omit
- (Luke 10:3) — ημελλεν ] εμελλεν
- Luke 10:15 — εαν ] μεν
- Luke 10:18 — ην ] δ'
- Luke 10:23 — λεγω ] + δε
- (Luke 10:44) — εκδυσαντες ] εξεδυσαν
- Luke 10:57 — 'πλησιον δοκει σοι ] δοκει σοι πλησιον
- (Luke 10:60) — τον λογον ] των λογων
- Luke 20:4.13.19.35.50.54.55.57.62.(65)<ref>Frederik Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, p. 122-125.</ref>
According to von Soden the group Kx in the 10th century evolved.
The group probably evolved from Family E. The text of the group is not so easy to distinct as groups Kr and K1. Von Soden included to this group these Kappa manuscripts, which are not classified as Kr or Ki.[3]
The Textus Receptus was created on the basis of the manuscripts of this group.
Members of the family
Codex Seidelianus II, 2, 3, 8, 14, 45, 47, 49, 51, 54, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 73, 75, 76, 78, 84, 89, 96, 99, 105, 107, 109, 121, 123, 126, 130, 132, 133, 134, 135, 140, 142, 144, 145, 147, 148, 149, 150, 219, 272, 301, 373, 358, 360, 412, 439, 470, 490, 529, 568, 778, 864, 875, 877, 939, 971, 1069, 1076, 1417, 1452, 1474, 1569, 1671, 1693, 2112, 2217, 2455, 2649.[5]
See also
References
- 1. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, p. 713.
- 2. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, pp. 734-757.
- 3. F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, p. 94.
- 4. H. von Soden Die Schriften, I/2, p. 718.
- 5. F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, pp. 95-99.
Further reading
- Hermann von Soden, Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments, in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte, Verlag von Arthur Glaue, Berlin 1902-1910, pp. 713-757.
- F. Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, pp. 94-99.
