The King James Only Controversy: Difference between revisions

From Textus Receptus
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The King James Only Controversy is a book written by [[James White]] in an attempt to smear all King James Version and Textus Receptus supporters as weird, kooky, and generally illiterate.
#REDIRECT [[The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?]]
 
==Errors==
 
[[James White]] in his book, [[The King James Only Controversy]], on page 270 he incorrectly says of the first rule: “His rule only applies to persons, not things.” but in Durham’s book, on page 22, he clearly states under the section, “Sharp’s first rule regularly applied to things”:
 
:Thirty-three verses were found in which Sharp’s rule was applied to things rather than persons. These verses were subdivided according to five categories: (1) Entities, (2) Characteristics, (3) Activities, (4) Locations, and (5) Times.
 
To give a few brief examples from the book:
 
:(1) Acts 1:25 “this ministry and apostleship”; Acts 2:23 “the predetermined plan and foreknowledge”.
:(2) Mark 8:38 “this adulterous and sinful generation”; Mark 16:14 “their unbelief and hardness of heart”.
:(3) Hebrews 6:7 “that drinks…and brings forth”.
:(4) Matthew 23:37 “who kills…and stones”.
:(5) Matthew 24:36 “that day and hour”; Acts 2:20 “the great and glorious day”.

Latest revision as of 11:44, 29 January 2016