https://textus-receptus.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AJohannine_Comma_and_Tertullian 2026-05-17T02:09:47Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.45.3 https://textus-receptus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Johannine_Comma_and_Tertullian&diff=372296&oldid=prev 2025-10-10T22:29:04Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 22:29, 10 October 2025</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">After dealing with Philip and the whole compass of this enquiry which continues till </del>the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">end </del>of the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Gospel, </del>in the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">same tenor of conversation, in which Father and </del>Son <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">are each distinguished in His special quality, He promises that “He will ask a Paraclete also from the Father</del>,<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">” … But we have already explained how it is He is “another.” … Thus the link with the Father in the Son </del>and of the Son in the Paraclete <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">makes </del>three <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">cleaving together</del>, <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">each to his neighbour. “These </del>three are one <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">thing</del>,<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">” </del>not one person, as it is <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">put: “I </del>and <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">the </del>Father are <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">one thing,” in respect to unity of nature, not as regards the singular number</del>.</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">"Thus </ins>the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">connection </ins>of the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Father </ins>in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, produces </ins>three <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">coherent persons, one from the other</ins>, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">which </ins>three are one, not one <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[</ins>person<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">]</ins>, as it is <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">said, "I </ins>and <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">my </ins>Father are <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">One</ins>.<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">""</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Nick https://textus-receptus.com/index.php?title=Talk:Johannine_Comma_and_Tertullian&diff=372295&oldid=prev 2025-10-10T22:28:57Z

<p>New page: After dealing with Philip and the whole compass of this enquiry which continues till the end of the Gospel, in the same tenor of conversation, in which Father and Son are each distinguishe...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>After dealing with Philip and the whole compass of this enquiry which continues till the end of the Gospel, in the same tenor of conversation, in which Father and Son are each distinguished in His special quality, He promises that “He will ask a Paraclete also from the Father,” … But we have already explained how it is He is “another.” … Thus the link with the Father in the Son and of the Son in the Paraclete makes three cleaving together, each to his neighbour. “These three are one thing,” not one person, as it is put: “I and the Father are one thing,” in respect to unity of nature, not as regards the singular number.</div>

Nick