Hebrews 4:8

From Textus Receptus

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→English Translations)
(→English Translations)
Line 83: Line 83:
* [[1380 AD|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
* [[1380 AD|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
-
* [[1395 AD|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
+
* [[1395 AD|1395]] For if Jhesus hadde youun reste to hem, he schulde neuere speke of othere aftir this dai. ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
-
* [[1534 AD|1534]] ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])
+
* [[1534 AD|1534]] For if Iosue had geven them rest then wolde he not afterwarde have spoke of another daye. ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])
-
* [[1535 AD|1535]] (Coverdale Bible)
+
* [[1535 AD|1535]] For yf Iosua had geuen them rest, the wolde he not afterwarde haue spoken, of another daye. (Coverdale Bible)
* [[1539 AD|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
* [[1539 AD|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
-
* [[1540 AD|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
+
* [[1540 AD|1540]] For yf Iosue had geuen them rest, then wolde he not afterwarde haue spoken of another daye. ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
-
* [[1549 AD|1549]] ([[Matthew's Bible]] - [[John Rogers]])
+
* [[1549 AD|1549]] For yf Iosue had geuen them reste, then woulde he not afterwarde haue spoken of another day. ([[Matthew's Bible]] - [[John Rogers]])
* [[1557 AD|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD|1557]])
* [[1557 AD|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD|1557]])
Line 99: Line 99:
* [[1560 AD|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition
* [[1560 AD|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition
-
* [[1568 AD|1568]] ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition
+
* [[1568 AD|1568]] For yf Iesus had geuen them reste, then woulde he not afterwarde haue spoken of another day. ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition
* [[1582 AD|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD|1582]])
* [[1582 AD|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD|1582]])
-
* [[1587 AD|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
+
* [[1587 AD|1587]] For if Iesus had giuen them rest, then would he not after this haue spoke of an other day. ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
* [[1599 AD|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
* [[1599 AD|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]
-
* [[1611 AD|1611]] ([[King James Version]])
+
* [[1611 AD|1611]] For if Iesus had giuen them rest, then would he not afterward haue spoken of another day. ([[King James Version]])
-
* [[1729 AD|1729]] ([[Mace New Testament]])
+
* [[1729 AD|1729]] for if Joshuah had given them rest, David would not afterwards have mentioned another day. ([[Mace New Testament]])
-
* [[1745 AD|1745]] (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
+
* [[1745 AD|1745]] For if Joshua had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
* [[1762 AD|1762]] ([[King James Version]])
* [[1762 AD|1762]] ([[King James Version]])
-
* [[1769 AD|1769]] ([[King James Version]] - [[Benjamin Blayney]])
+
* [[1769 AD|1769]] For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. ([[King James Version]] - [[Benjamin Blayney]])
-
* [[1770 AD|1770]] (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
+
* [[1770 AD|1770]] For if Joshua had given them the rest, He would not afterwards have spoken of another day. (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
-
* [[1790 AD|1790]] (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
+
* [[1790 AD|1790]] For if Joshua had given them the rest. he would not have afterward spoken of another day: (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
-
* [[1795 AD|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
+
* [[1795 AD|1795]] For if Joshua had given them the rest, he would not afterwards have spoken of another day. (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
-
* [[1833 AD|1833]] (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])
+
* [[1833 AD|1833]] For if Jesus had given them rest, then he would not afterward have spoken of another day. (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])
-
* [[1835 AD|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)  
+
* [[1835 AD|1835]] For, if Joshua has caused them to rest, he would not, after that, have spoken of another day. (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)  
-
* [[1849 AD|1849]] ([[Etheridge Translation]] by [[John Etheridge]])
+
* [[1849 AD|1849]] but if Jeshu-bar-Nun had established them in rest, he [would] not have spoken afterwards of another day: ([[Etheridge Translation]] by [[John Etheridge]])
* [[1850 AD|1850]] ([[King James Version]] by Committee)
* [[1850 AD|1850]] ([[King James Version]] by Committee)
Line 135: Line 135:
* [[1855 AD|1855]] [[Calvin Bible]] by the [[Calvin Translation Society]]
* [[1855 AD|1855]] [[Calvin Bible]] by the [[Calvin Translation Society]]
-
* [[1858 AD|1858]] (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by [[Leicester Sawyer]])
+
* [[1858 AD|1858]] For if Joshua caused them to rest he would not have spoken of another day afterwards. (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by [[Leicester Sawyer]])
-
* [[1865 AD|1865]] ([[The Emphatic Diaglott]] by [[Benjamin Wilson]])  
+
* [[1865 AD|1865]] If for them Jesus caused to rest, not would concerning another have spoken after these of a day. ([[The Emphatic Diaglott]] by [[Benjamin Wilson]])  
-
* [[1865 AD|1865]] (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
+
* [[1865 AD|1865]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not, after this, have spoken of another day. (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
-
* [[1869 AD|1869]] (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)  
+
* [[1869 AD|1869]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not after this be speaking of another day. (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)  
-
* [[1873 AD|1873]] ([[King James Version]]) by [[Frederick Scrivener]])
+
* [[1873 AD|1873]] For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. ([[King James Version]]) by [[Frederick Scrivener]])
-
* [[1885 AD|1885]] (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
+
* [[1885 AD|1885]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day. (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
-
* [[1890 AD|1890]] (Darby Version 1890 by [[John Darby]])
+
* [[1890 AD|1890]] For if Jesus had brought them into rest, he would not have spoken afterwards about another day. (Darby Version 1890 by [[John Darby]])
-
* [[1898 AD|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])
+
* [[1898 AD|1898]] for if Joshua had given them rest, He would not concerning another day have spoken after these things; ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])
-
* [[1901 AD|1901]] ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])
+
* [[1901 AD|1901]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day. ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])
-
* [[1902 AD|1902]] (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
+
* [[1902 AD|1902]] For, if, unto them, Joshua had given rest, it had not in that case, concerning another day, been speaking, after, these things. (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
-
* [[1902 AD|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
+
* [[1902 AD|1902]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not speak concerning another day after these things. (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
-
* [[1904 AD|1904]] (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by [[Adolphus Worrell]])
+
* [[1904 AD|1904]] For, had Joshua given them rest, He would not afterward have spoken of another day. (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by [[Adolphus Worrell]])
-
* [[1904 AD|1904]] (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
+
* [[1904 AD|1904]] Now if Joshua had given 'Rest' to the people, God would not have spoken of another and later day. (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
* [[1911 AD|1911]] (Syrus Scofield)
* [[1911 AD|1911]] (Syrus Scofield)
-
* [[1912 AD|1912]] (Weymouth New Testament)  
+
* [[1912 AD|1912]] For if Joshua had given them the true rest, we should not afterwards hear God speaking of another still future day. (Weymouth New Testament)  
-
* [[1918 AD|1918]] (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
+
* [[1918 AD|1918]] For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not after this have spoken of another day. (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
* [[1923 AD|1923]] (Edgar Goodspeed)
* [[1923 AD|1923]] (Edgar Goodspeed)

Revision as of 11:55, 6 May 2015

  • ΠΡΟΣ ΕΒΡΑΙΟΥΣ 4:8 εἰ γὰρ αὐτοὺς Ἰησοῦς κατέπαυσεν οὐκ ἂν περὶ ἄλλης ἐλάλει μετὰ ταῦτα ἡμέρας

(Textus Receptus, Theodore Beza, 1598)

  • Hebrews 4:8 For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

(King James Version, Pure Cambridge Edition 1900)

  • Hebrews 4:8 Because if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day.

(Textus Receptus Version)

Contents

Interlinear

Commentary

Greek

Textus Receptus

Desiderius Erasmus

Colinæus

Stephanus (Robert Estienne)

Theodore Beza

See Also Matthew 1:1 Beza 1598 (Beza)

  • 1604 (Beza Octavo 5th)

Elzevir

Scholz

Scrivener

  • 1894 (? ????? ???T???)

Other Greek

  • 1857 (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
  • (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
  • 1881 (Westcott & Hort)
  • (Greek orthodox Church)

Anglo Saxon Translations

  • 1000 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Manuscript 140, Corpus Christi College by Aelfric)
  • 1200 (Anglo-Saxon Gospels Hatton Manuscript 38, Bodleian Library by unknown author)

English Translations

  • 1535 For yf Iosua had geuen them rest, the wolde he not afterwarde haue spoken, of another daye. (Coverdale Bible)
  • 1568 For yf Iesus had geuen them reste, then woulde he not afterwarde haue spoken of another day. (Bishop's Bible First Edition
  • 1611 For if Iesus had giuen them rest, then would he not afterward haue spoken of another day. (King James Version)
  • 1729 for if Joshuah had given them rest, David would not afterwards have mentioned another day. (Mace New Testament)
  • 1745 For if Joshua had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)
  • 1770 For if Joshua had given them the rest, He would not afterwards have spoken of another day. (Worsley Version by John Worsley)
  • 1790 For if Joshua had given them the rest. he would not have afterward spoken of another day: (Wesley Version by John Wesley)
  • 1795 For if Joshua had given them the rest, he would not afterwards have spoken of another day. (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)
  • 1833 For if Jesus had given them rest, then he would not afterward have spoken of another day. (Webster Version - by Noah Webster)
  • 1835 For, if Joshua has caused them to rest, he would not, after that, have spoken of another day. (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)
  • 1851 (Murdock Translation)
  • 1858 For if Joshua caused them to rest he would not have spoken of another day afterwards. (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by Leicester Sawyer)
  • 1865 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not, after this, have spoken of another day. (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)
  • 1869 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not after this be speaking of another day. (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)
  • 1885 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not have spoken afterward of another day. (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)
  • 1890 For if Jesus had brought them into rest, he would not have spoken afterwards about another day. (Darby Version 1890 by John Darby)
  • 1902 For, if, unto them, Joshua had given rest, it had not in that case, concerning another day, been speaking, after, these things. (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)
  • 1902 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not speak concerning another day after these things. (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)
  • 1904 For, had Joshua given them rest, He would not afterward have spoken of another day. (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by Adolphus Worrell)
  • 1904 Now if Joshua had given 'Rest' to the people, God would not have spoken of another and later day. (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)
  • 1911 (Syrus Scofield)
  • 1912 For if Joshua had given them the true rest, we should not afterwards hear God speaking of another still future day. (Weymouth New Testament)
  • 1918 For if Joshua had given them rest, he would not after this have spoken of another day. (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)
  • 1923 (Edgar Goodspeed)

Foreign Language Versions

Arabic

  • لانه لو كان يشوع قد اراحهم لما تكلم بعد ذلك عن يوم آخر. (Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

Aramaic

  • ܐܠܘ ܓܝܪ ܝܫܘܥ ܒܪ ܢܘܢ ܐܢܝܚ ܗܘܐ ܐܢܘܢ ܠܐ ܐܡܪ ܗܘܐ ܡܢ ܒܬܪܟܢ ܥܠ ܝܘܡܐ ܐܚܪܢܐ (Aramaic Peshitta)

Basque

  • Ecen baldin Iosuec hæy eman balaraue reposic, etzatequeen guehiagoric berce egunez minçatu.

Bulgarian

  • 1940 Защото, ако Исус [Навиев] беше им дал почивка, [Бог] не би говорил след това за друг ден. (Bulgarian Bible)

Chinese

  • 1 若 是 约 书 亚 已 叫 他 们 享 了 安 息 ， 後 来 神 就 不 再 提 别 的 日 子 了 。 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))
  • 1 若 是 約 書 亞 已 叫 他 們 享 了 安 息 ， 後 來 神 就 不 再 提 別 的 日 子 了 。 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))

French

  • Car si Josué leur avait donné le repos, il n'aurait pas parlé après cela d'un autre jour. (French Darby)
  • 1744 Car si Josué les eût introduits dans le repos, jamais après cela il n'eût parlé d'un autre jour. (Martin 1744)
  • 1744 Car si Josué les eût introduits dans le repos, Dieu ne parlerait pas après cela d'un autre jour. (Ostervald 1744)

German

  • 1545 Denn so Josua sie hätte zur Ruhe gebracht, würde er nicht hernach von einem andern Tage gesagt haben. (Luther 1545)
  • 1871 Denn wenn Josua (Griech.: Jesus) sie in die Ruhe gebracht hätte, so würde er danach nicht von einem anderen Tage geredet haben. (Elberfelder 1871)
  • 1912 Denn so Josua hätte sie zur Ruhe gebracht, würde er nicht hernach von einem andern Tage gesagt haben. (Luther 1912)

Italian

  • 1649 Perciocchè, se Giosuè li avesse messi nel riposo, Iddio non avrebbe dipoi parlato d’altro giorno.(Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)
  • 1927 Infatti, se Giosuè avesse dato loro il riposo, Iddio non avrebbe di poi parlato d’un altro giorno. (Riveduta Bible 1927)

Japanese

Latin

  • nam si eis Iesus requiem praestitisset numquam de alio loqueretur posthac die Latin Vulgate
  • 1527 (Erasmus 1527)
  • 1527 (Erasmus Vulgate 1527)

Pidgin

  • 1996 (Pidgin King Jems)

Romainian

  • 2010 Căci, dacă le-ar fi dat Iosua odihna, n'ar mai vorbi Dumnezeu după aceea de o altă zi. (Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna)

Russian

  • 1876 Ибо если бы Иисус Навин доставил им покой, то не было бы сказано после того о другом дне. Russian Synodal Version

Phonetically:

Spanish

  • Porque si Josué les hubiera dado el reposo, no hablaría después de otro día. (RVG Spanish)

Swedish

  • 1917 Ty om Josua hade fört dem in i vilan, så skulle Gud icke hava talat om en annan, senare dag. (Swedish - Svenska 1917)

Tagalog

  • 1905 Sapagka't kung ibinigay sa kanila ni Josue ang kapahingahan, ay hindi na sana niya sasalitain pagkatapos ang ibang araw. (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)

Tok Pisin

  • 1996 (Tok Pisin King Jems)

Vietnamese

  • 1934 Vả, nếu Giô-suê đã cho họ yên nghỉ, thì chắc sau không còn nói về một ngày khác nữa. (VIET)

See Also

External Links

Retrieved from "http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Hebrews_4:8"
Personal tools