Textual criticism - Revision history

Beza 1598 at 11:07, 8 March 2016

Beza 1598 — Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:07:50 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 8 March 2016
Line 98:		Line 98:
	==External Links==		==External Links==
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]
		+
		+	{{Donate}}

Nick: /* External evidence */

Nick — Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:03:27 GMT

External evidence

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 20 January 2015
Line 46:		Line 46:

	=== External evidence ===		=== External evidence ===
-	~~<--edited to here-->~~
	''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.		''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.

Nick at 16:46, 21 May 2011

Nick — Sat, 21 May 2011 16:46:10 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 21 May 2011
Line 49:		Line 49:
	''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.		''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.

-	There are many other more sophisticated considerations. For example, readings that depart from the known practice of a scribe or a given period may be deemed more reliable, since a scribe is unlikely on his own initiative to have departed from the usual practice.<~~ref name=textandinterpretation~~>~~Hartin, Petzer, Mannig 2001, pp. 47–53~~</~~ref~~>	+	There are many other more sophisticated considerations. For example, readings that depart from the known practice of a scribe or a given period may be deemed more reliable, since a scribe is unlikely on his own initiative to have departed from the usual practice.<sup>[]</sup>

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick: /* External evidence */

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:14:51 GMT

External evidence

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 15 January 2011
Line 46:		Line 46:

	=== External evidence ===		=== External evidence ===
-		+	<--edited to here-->
	''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.		''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.

	There are many other more sophisticated considerations. For example, readings that depart from the known practice of a scribe or a given period may be deemed more reliable, since a scribe is unlikely on his own initiative to have departed from the usual practice.<ref name=textandinterpretation>Hartin, Petzer, Mannig 2001, pp. 47–53</ref>		There are many other more sophisticated considerations. For example, readings that depart from the known practice of a scribe or a given period may be deemed more reliable, since a scribe is unlikely on his own initiative to have departed from the usual practice.<ref name=textandinterpretation>Hartin, Petzer, Mannig 2001, pp. 47–53</ref>
-

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick at 03:14, 15 January 2011

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:14:29 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:14, 15 January 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The phrase ''lower criticism'' is used to describe the contrast between textual criticism and ''[[higher criticism\|"higher" criticism]]'', which is the endeavor to establish the authorship, date, and place of composition of the original text.		The phrase ''lower criticism'' is used to describe the contrast between textual criticism and ''[[higher criticism\|"higher" criticism]]'', which is the endeavor to establish the authorship, date, and place of composition of the original text.
		+
		+	== History ==
		+	Textual criticism has been practiced for over two thousand years. Early textual critics were concerned with preserving the works of [[ancient history\|antiquity]], and this continued through the [[medieval]] period into [[early modern]] times until the invention of the [[printing press]].
		+
		+	Many ancient works, such as the [[Bible]] and the Greek tragedies, survive in hundreds of copies, and the relationship of each copy to the original may be unclear. Textual scholars have debated for centuries which sources are most closely derived from the original, hence which readings in those sources are correct. Although biblical books that are letters, like Greek plays, presumably had one original, the question of whether some biblical books, like the [[gospel]]s, ever had just one original has been discussed.<sup>[]</sup> Interest in applying textual criticism to the Qur'an has also developed after the discovery of the [[Sana'a manuscripts]] in [[1972 AD\|1972]], which possibly date back to the 7-8th century.
		+
		+	In the English language, the works of [[Shakespeare]] have been a particularly fertile ground for textual criticism—both because the texts, as transmitted, contain a considerable amount of variation, and because the effort and expense of producing superior editions of his works have always been widely viewed as worthwhile.<sup>[]</sup> The principles of textual criticism, although originally developed and refined for works of antiquity, the [[Bible]], and Shakespeare,<sup>[]</sup> have been applied to many works, extending backwards from the present to the earliest known written documents, in Mesopotamia and Egypt—a period of about five millennia.
		+
		+	== Basic notions and objectives ==
		+
		+	The basic problem, as described by [[Paul Maas (classical scholar)\|Paul Maas]], is as follows:
		+	:"We have no [[autograph]] manuscripts of the [[ancient Greece\|Greek]] and [[Ancient Rome\|Roman]] classical writers and no copies which have been [[collated]] with the originals; the manuscripts we possess derive from the originals through an unknown number of intermediate copies, and are consequentially of questionable trustworthiness. The business of textual criticism is to produce a text as close as possible to the original (''constitutio textus'')." <sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	Maas comments further that "A dictation revised by the author must be regarded as equivalent to an autograph manuscript". The lack of autograph manuscripts applies to many cultures other than Greek and Roman. In such a situation, a key objective becomes the identification of the first ''exemplar'' before any split in the tradition. That exemplar is known as the ''[[archetype]]''. "If we succeed in establishing the text of [the archetype], the ''constitutio'' (reconstruction of the original) is considerably advanced.<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	The textual critic's ultimate objective is the production of a "critical edition". This contains a text most closely approximating the original, which is accompanied by an ''apparatus criticus'' (or [[critical apparatus]]) that presents:
		+	*the evidence that the editor considered (names of manuscripts, or abbreviations called [[sigla]]),
		+	*the editor's analysis of that evidence (sometimes a simple likelihood rating), and
		+	*a record of rejected variants (often in order of preference).<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	== Process ==
		+	[[Image:P46.jpg\|thumb\|200px\|Folio from [[Papyrus 46]], containing [[2 Corinthians]] 11:33–12:9]]
		+	Before mechanical printing, literature was copied by hand, and many variations were introduced by copyists. The age of printing made the scribal profession effectively redundant. Printed editions, while less susceptible to the proliferation of variations likely to arise during manual transmission, are nonetheless not immune to introducing variations from an author's autograph. Instead of a scribe miscopying his source, a compositor or a printing shop may read or typeset a work in a way that differs from the autograph.<sup>[]</sup>
		+	Since each scribe or printer commits different errors, reconstruction of the lost original is often aided by a selection of readings taken from many sources. An edited text that draws from multiple sources is said to be ''eclectic''. In contrast to this approach, some textual critics prefer to identify the single best surviving text, and not to combine readings from multiple sources.<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	When comparing different documents, or "witnesses", of a single, original text, the observed differences are called ''variant readings'', or simply ''variants'' or ''readings''. It is not always apparent which single variant represents the author's original work. The process of textual criticism seeks to explain how each variant may have entered the text, either by accident (duplication or omission) or intention (harmonization or censorship), as scribes or supervisors transmitted the original author's text by copying it. The textual critic's task, therefore, is to sort through the variants, eliminating those most likely to be ''un''-original, hence establishing a "critical text", or critical edition, that is intended to best approximate the original. At the same time, the critical text should document variant readings, so the relation of extant witnesses to the reconstructed original is apparent to a reader of the critical edition. In establishing the critical text, the textual critic considers both "external" evidence (the age, provenance, and affiliation of each witness) and "internal" or "physical" considerations (what the author and scribes, or printers, were likely to have done).<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	The collation of all known variants of a text is referred to as a [[variorum]], namely a work of textual criticism whereby all variations and emendations are set side by side so that a reader can track how textual decisions have been made in the preparation of a text for publication.<sup>[]</sup> The [[Bible]] and the works of [[William Shakespeare]] have often been the subjects of variorum editions, although the same techniques have been applied with less frequency to many other works, such as [[Walt Whitman\|Walt Whitman's]] [[Leaves of Grass]],<sup>[]</sup>
		+	and the prose writings of [[Edward Fitzgerald]].<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	== Eclecticism ==
		+
		+	[[Eclecticism]] refers to the practice of consulting a wide diversity of witnesses to a particular original. The practice is based on the principle that the more independent transmission histories are, the less likely they will be to reproduce the same errors. What one omits, the others may retain; what one adds, the others are unlikely to add. Eclecticism allows inferences to be drawn regarding the original text, based on the evidence of contrasts between witnesses.
		+
		+	Eclectic readings also normally give an impression of the number of witnesses to each available reading. Although a reading supported by the majority of witnesses is frequently preferred, this does not follow automatically. For example, a second edition of a Shakespeare play may include an addition alluding to an event known to have happened between the two editions. Although nearly all subsequent manuscripts may have included the addition, textual critics may reconstruct the original without the addition.
		+
		+	The result of the process is a text with readings drawn from many witnesses. It is not a copy of any particular manuscript, and may deviate from the majority of existing manuscripts. In a purely eclectic approach, no single witness is theoretically favored. Instead, the critic forms opinions about individual witnesses, relying on both external and internal evidence.<sup>[]</sup>
		+
		+	Since the mid-19th century, eclecticism, in which there is no ''a priori'' bias to a single manuscript, has been the dominant method of editing the critical Greek text of the [[New Testament]] (currently, the [[United Bible Society]], 4th ed. and Nestle-Aland, 27th ed.). Even so, the oldest manuscripts, being of the [[Alexandrian text-type]], are the most favored, and the critical text has an Alexandrian disposition.<sup>[]</sup> While 99% of Greek New Testament manuscripts favor Textus Receptus type readings, most scholars who favor the critical text have rejected those readings in favor of the [[Alexandrian text-type]], primarily two manuscripts, [[Codex Sinaiticus]] and [[Codex Vaticanus]].
		+
		+	=== External evidence ===
		+
		+	''External evidence'' is evidence of each physical witness, its date, source, and relationship to other known witnesses. Critics will often prefer the readings supported by the ''oldest'' witnesses. Since errors tend to accumulate, older manuscripts should have fewer errors. Readings supported by a ''majority'' of witnesses are also usually preferred, since these are less likely to reflect accidents or individual biases. For the same reasons, the most ''geographically diverse'' witnesses are preferred. Some manuscripts show evidence that particular care was taken in their composition, for example, by including alternative readings in their margins, demonstrating that more than one prior copy (exemplar) was consulted in producing the current one. Other factors being equal, these are the ''best'' witnesses.
		+
		+	There are many other more sophisticated considerations. For example, readings that depart from the known practice of a scribe or a given period may be deemed more reliable, since a scribe is unlikely on his own initiative to have departed from the usual practice.<ref name=textandinterpretation>Hartin, Petzer, Mannig 2001, pp. 47–53</ref>
		+

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick at 02:48, 15 January 2011

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:48:51 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 15 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.	+	Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts. Ancient [[scribes]] made errors or alterations when copying manuscripts by hand.<sup>[1]</sup>
		+	Given a manuscript copy, several or many copies, but not the original document, the textual critic seeks to reconstruct the original text (the [[archetype]] or autograph) as closely as possible. The same processes can be used to attempt to reconstruct intermediate editions, or [[recension]]s, of a document's transcription history.<sup>[2]</sup> The ultimate objective of the textual critic's work is the production of a "critical edition" containing a text most closely approximating the original.
		+
		+	There are three fundamental approaches to textual criticism: [[#Eclecticism\|eclecticism]], [[#Stemmatics\|stemmatics]], and [[#Copy-text editing\|copy-text editing]]. Techniques from the biological discipline of [[cladistics]] are currently also being used to determine the relationships between manuscripts.
		+
		+	The phrase ''lower criticism'' is used to describe the contrast between textual criticism and ''[[higher criticism\|"higher" criticism]]'', which is the endeavor to establish the authorship, date, and place of composition of the original text.

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick: /* Critical editions */

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:22:20 GMT

Critical editions

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 15 January 2011
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* ''[[Editio Critica Maior]]'' - German Bible Society edition		* ''[[Editio Critica Maior]]'' - German Bible Society edition
	;Critical Translations		;Critical Translations
-	* ''The Comprehensive New Testament'' - standardardized Nestle-Aland 27 edition<~~ref~~>~~http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/6583_7128.pdf~~</~~ref~~>	+	* ''The Comprehensive New Testament'' - standardardized Nestle-Aland 27 edition<sup>[76]</sup>
	* ''The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible'' -- with textual mapping to Masoretic, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Septuagint variants		* ''The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible'' -- with textual mapping to Masoretic, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Septuagint variants

Nick: /* See also */

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:21:45 GMT

Nick at 02:20, 15 January 2011

Nick — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:20:17 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:20, 15 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.		Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.
		+
		+	== See also ==
		+	=== Topics===
		+	* [[Authority (textual criticism)]]
		+	* [[A Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture]]
		+	* [[Glosses to the Bible\|Biblical glosses]]
		+	* [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts]]
		+	* [[Biblical manuscript]]
		+	* [[Bible version debate]]
		+	* [[Comma Johanneum]]
		+	* [[Hermeneutics]]
		+	* [[John 21]]
		+	* [[List of omitted Bible verses]]
		+	* [[Mark 16]]
		+	* [[Palaeography]]
		+	* [[Pericope Adulteræ]]
		+	* [[Source criticism]]
		+	* [[Wiseman hypothesis]]
		+	* [[List of Bible verses not included in modern translations]]
		+	* [[Modern English Bible translations]]
		+	* [[Textus Receptus]]
		+	* [[Dean Burgon Society]]
		+	* [[Biblical manuscript]]s
		+

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]

Nick at 12:16, 10 March 2009

Nick — Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:16:21 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 10 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.		Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.
		+
		+	==External Links==
		+	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 15 January 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:
	* [[Source criticism]]		* [[Source criticism]]
	* [[Wiseman hypothesis]]		* [[Wiseman hypothesis]]
-	* [[List of Bible verses not included in modern translations]]	+	*[[List of Bible verses not included in modern translations]]
-	* [[Modern English Bible translations]]	+	*[[Modern English Bible translations]]
-	* [[Textus Receptus]]	+	*[[Textus Receptus]]
-	* [[Dean Burgon Society]]	+	*[[Dean Burgon Society]]
	* [[Biblical manuscript]]s		* [[Biblical manuscript]]s

		+	===Critical editions===
		+	;Hebrew Bible
		+	* ''Septuaginta'' - Rahlf's 2nd edition
		+	* ''[[Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia]]'' - 4th edition
		+	;New Testament
		+	* ''Editio octava critica maior'' - Tischendorf edition
		+	* ''The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text'' - Hodges & Farstad edition
		+	* ''[[The New Testament in the Original Greek]]'' - Westcott & Hort edition
		+	* ''[[Novum Testamentum Graece]]'' Nestle-Aland 27 edition (NA 27)
		+	* ''United Bible Society's Greek New Testament'' (UBS4)
		+	* ''Novum Testamentum Graece et Latine'' - Merk edition
		+	* ''[[Editio Critica Maior]]'' - German Bible Society edition
		+	;Critical Translations
		+	* ''The Comprehensive New Testament'' - standardardized Nestle-Aland 27 edition<ref>http://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/6583_7128.pdf</ref>
		+	* ''The Dead Sea Scrolls Bible'' -- with textual mapping to Masoretic, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Septuagint variants
		+
		+	=== Lists===
		+	* [[List of New Testament papyri]]
		+	* [[List of New Testament uncials]]
		+	* [[List of manuscripts]]
		+	* [[List of Biblical commentaries]]
		+	* [[Textual variants in the New Testament]]

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]		[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism Wikipedia Article on Textual criticism]