1 Corinthians 14:34 - Revision history

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

Textus Receptus — Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:57:55 GMT

External Links

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 29 April 2018
Line 287:		Line 287:

	==External Links==		==External Links==
-	* [http://www.standardbearers.net/uploads/Ahaziahs_Age_Upon_His_Accession_Chronology_of_the_OT_Dr_Floyd_Nolen_Jones_PhD_ThD.pdf Ahaziahs Age Upon His Accession Chronology of the OT] by Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones	+
		+
		+	{{Donate}}

	==Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35==		==Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35==
	:The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)		:The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)

Beza 1598 at 06:03, 4 March 2017

Beza 1598 — Sat, 04 Mar 2017 06:03:58 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 4 March 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

-	*'''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 ~~(TRV)~~\|1 Corinthians 14:34]]''' Let your women keep silent in the churches, because they are not permitted to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as the law also says.	+	*'''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 King James Version 2016\|1 Corinthians 14:34]]''' Let your women keep silent in the churches, because they are not permitted to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as the law also says.

-	{{~~Progressive~~ King James Version}}	+	{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598 at 11:40, 5 January 2017

Beza 1598 — Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:40:46 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 5 January 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Verses in 1 Corinthians 14}}		{{Verses in 1 Corinthians 14}}
-	* '''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Α΄ 14:34]]'''	+	* '''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΟΥΣ Α΄ 14:34]]''' [[3588\|Αἱ]] [[1135\|γυναῖκες]] [[5216\|ὑμῶν]] [[1722\|ἐν]] [[3588\|ταῖς]] [[1577\|ἐκκλησίαις]] [[4601\|σιγάτωσαν·]] [[3756\|οὐ]] [[1063\|γὰρ]] [[2010\|ἐπιτέτραπται]] [[846\|αὐταῖς]] [[2980\|λαλεῖν,]] [[235\|ἀλλ’]] [[5293\|ὑποτάσσεσθαι,]] [[2531\|καθὼς]] [[2532\|καὶ]] [[3588\|ὁ]] [[3551\|νόμος]] [[3004\|λέγει.]]

	{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}		{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

-	*'''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 (TRV)\|1 Corinthians 14:34]]'''	+	*'''[[1 Corinthians 14:34 (TRV)\|1 Corinthians 14:34]]''' Let your women keep silent in the churches, because they are not permitted to speak; but they are commanded to be submissive, as the law also says.

	{{Progressive King James Version}}		{{Progressive King James Version}}

Beza 1598 at 13:54, 2 August 2016

Beza 1598 — Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:54:03 GMT

Show changes

Nick at 07:15, 3 January 2016

Nick — Sun, 03 Jan 2016 07:15:00 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:15, 3 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''1 Corinthians 14:34''' Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.		'''1 Corinthians 14:34''' Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
		+
		+	==Straatman and 1 Cor 14:33-35==
		+	:The question whether Paul really instructed women to be silent in community gatherings or whether this text is in fact a later interpolation (1 Cor. 14:33b/34-35), is one of the most hotly debated text critical issues. Controversies over the past century surrounding the role of women in Christian communities have made the status of these verses especially significant. This paper will clarify the curious origins of this particular conjectural emendation and the context in which it arose. In doing so, it contributes to the ‘historical turn’ in textual criticism and illustrates the historical value of studying textual conjectures. The emendation will be shown to predate debates on women in the ministry and to have its background in another long-running dispute, that of the nature of the resurrection. The Dutch scholar Jan Willem Straatman was the first to argue for the inauthenticity of this passage, in 1863, as part of a broader case about the corrupted make-up of 1 Corinthians. His argument culminates in a rejection of Pauline authorship of statements about the appearance of the risen Christ (1 Cor. 15:3-11). Even though Straatman was thus not primarily motivated by a concern for the position of women in the church, the passage still struck him as one of the most obviously inauthentic texts in the New Testament. The arguments put forward by him are those that have remained significant in subsequent discussions: in addition to textual variations, Straatman highlights the apparent contradiction with the acceptance of women’s speech in 1 Cor. 11, and with the equality between men and women suggested by Gal. 3:28, that in Christ there is ‘no male and female’. In Straatman’s view, a text that urges women to be obedient and silent declares them to be inferior to men, and should therefore be rejected as un-Pauline. As part of the project 'New Testament Conjectural Emendation: A Comprehensive Enquiry' (at VU University, Amsterdam), this analysis of the origins of Straatman’s emendation highlights the historical insights that the study of textual conjecture yields. The case of Straatman shows that already in the mid-19th century, attitudes towards women were such that this passage could present itself as problematic for a critical reader. This analysis also illustrates the particular religious environment in which such a critical reading could originate. In supporting his rejection of bodily resurrection with the claim that the command for women to be silent is a later interpolation, Straatman raised an issue that has continued to plague Pauline scholarship until the present day. (Jan Krans)

Textus Receptus: New page: '''1 Corinthians 14:34''' Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

Textus Receptus — Thu, 03 Feb 2011 06:47:43 GMT

New page: '''1 Corinthians 14:34''' Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.

New page

'''1 Corinthians 14:34''' Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.