Apollonius' Corollary - Revision history

Beza 1598: /* See Also */

2016-03-15T17:03:35Z

Nick at 20:46, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T20:46:13Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius]]' canon is named after [[Apollonius Dyscolus]], a [[grammarian]] of the second century A.D. It is the rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article.	+	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius]]' canon is named after [[Apollonius Dyscolus]], a [[grammarian]] of the second century A.D. It is the rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.

-	It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun~~. states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without them~~. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:	+	It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:

-	:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;	+	:(1) the head noun may be [[anarthrous]] (without an article) while the genitive qualifier is [[articular]], especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;
-	:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.	+	:(2) either may be [[anarthrous]] if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.

	:ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).		:ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).
Line 10:		Line 10:
	:τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).		:τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).

-	It is ~~termed~~ a ~~corollary because~~ it is ~~related~~ to ~~Apollonius' canon~~.	+	When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun. Usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous, usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative.

-	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.	+	The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are [[anarthrous]], both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a
-		+
-	The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a	+
	one-step difference between the two substantives (e.g., D-Q), only rarely did the two nouns differ by two steps (either I-D or D-I). Hedges worked only in the Pauline letters, but his conclusions are similar to other work done in the rest of the NT."		one-step difference between the two substantives (e.g., D-Q), only rarely did the two nouns differ by two steps (either I-D or D-I). Hedges worked only in the Pauline letters, but his conclusions are similar to other work done in the rest of the NT."

Nick at 13:19, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T13:19:13Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 26 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.		:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.

-	;ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).	+	:ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).
-	;ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ = the kingdom of God (Mk 4:26).	+	:ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ = the kingdom of God (Mk 4:26).
-	;τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).	+	:τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).

	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.		It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.

Nick at 13:18, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T13:18:58Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 26 January 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.		:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.

-	ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).	+	;ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).
-	ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ = the kingdom of God (Mk 4:26).	+	;ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ = the kingdom of God (Mk 4:26).
-	τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).	+	;τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).

	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.		It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.

Nick at 13:17, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T13:17:49Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius]]' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without	+	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius]]' canon is named after [[Apollonius Dyscolus]], a [[grammarian]] of the second century A.D. It is the rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article.
-	them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:	+
		+	It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun. states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:

	:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;		:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;
Line 12:		Line 13:

	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.		[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.
-
-	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.

	The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a		The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a

Nick at 13:12, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T13:12:34Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 26 January 2016
Line 11:		Line 11:
	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.		It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.

-	[[Apollonius ~~DyscolusApollonius~~ of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.	+	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.

	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.		The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)		:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)
		+
		+	==See Also==
		+	* [[Apollonius Dyscolus]]

Nick at 13:12, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T13:12:12Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Apollonius' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without	+	[[Apollonius Dyscolus\|Apollonius]]' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without
	them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:		them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:

Line 11:		Line 11:
	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.		It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.

-	Apollonius of Dyscolus was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.	+	[[Apollonius DyscolusApollonius of Dyscolus]] was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.

	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.		The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.

Nick at 11:52, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T11:52:53Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	"Apollonius of Dyscolus was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.
-
-	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.
-
	Apollonius' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without		Apollonius' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without
	them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:		them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:
		+
	:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;		:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;
	:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.		:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.
Line 13:		Line 10:

	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.		It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.
		+
		+	Apollonius of Dyscolus was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.
		+
		+	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.

	The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a		The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a

Nick at 11:52, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T11:52:09Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	"Apollonius of Dyscolus was a second century A.D. Greek grammarian who stated that, usually when a noun is modified by another noun in the genitive case, both nouns will have the article prefixed to them or neither will have the article. When both nouns are anarthrous (without an article), usually they are both mutually definite or both indefinite or both qualitative…. When the genitive noun is a proper noun, the article may be absent when the proper noun precedes or follows the articular noun and also when it is bracketed between the article and the noun.
		+
		+	The rule that when one noun governs another noun (i.e., they occur "in regimen" ~ a noun qualified by a genitive noun) both either have or lack the article. Named after Apollonius Dyscolus, a grammarian of the second century a.d. It is usually handled in the grammars under a discussion of the genitive since the construction includes a head noun and a genitive noun.
		+
		+	Apollonius' canon states that in general two nouns in regimen will both have articles or both are without
		+	them. This rule holds true more than eighty percent of the time. There are two basic modifications that will explain most exceptions:
		+	:(1) the head noun may be anarthrous while the genitive qualifier is articular, especially if the head noun is the object of a preposition, a predicate nominative, or vocative;
		+	:(2) either may be anarthrous if it is a proper name (including κύριος) even though the other may be articular.
		+
		+	ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου = the son of man (Mt 9:6).
		+	ἡ βασιλεία τοῦ θεοῦ = the kingdom of God (Mk 4:26).
		+	τὸν λόγον τοῦ θεοῦ = the word of God (Acts 13:5).
		+
		+	It is termed a corollary because it is related to Apollonius' canon.
		+
		+	The corollary to this rule (Apollonius' Corollary), developed by David Hedges, is that when both nouns are anarthrous, both will usually have the same semantic force. That is, both will be, for example, definite (D-D), the most commonly shared semantic force. Somewhat less common is qualitative-qualitative (Q-Q). The least likely semantic force is indefinite-indefinite (I-I). Further, although not infrequently was there a
		+	one-step difference between the two substantives (e.g., D-Q), only rarely did the two nouns differ by two steps (either I-D or D-I). Hedges worked only in the Pauline letters, but his conclusions are similar to other work done in the rest of the NT."
		+
	[[Daniel Wallace]] concerning the Apollonius' Corollary on pages 250–52, in his book [[Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics]]:		[[Daniel Wallace]] concerning the Apollonius' Corollary on pages 250–52, in his book [[Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics]]:

	:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)		:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)

Nick at 11:43, 26 January 2016

2016-01-26T11:43:59Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 26 January 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	[[Daniel Wallace]] ~~describes~~ the Apollonius' Corollary on pages 250–52, in his book [[Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics]]:	+	[[Daniel Wallace]] concerning the Apollonius' Corollary on pages 250–52, in his book [[Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics]]:

	:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)		:h. A Genitive Construction (Apollonius’ Corollary): anarthrous head noun with anarthrous genitive noun: both usually have the same semantic force (usually definite or qualitative) (250–52)

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 15 March 2016
Line 21:		Line 21:
	==See Also==		==See Also==
	* [[Apollonius Dyscolus]]		* [[Apollonius Dyscolus]]
		+
		+	{{Donate}}