User talk:Nick - Revision history

203.76.178.136: Able to freely edit?

2012-04-27T09:41:53Z

Able to freely edit?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:41, 27 April 2012
Line 40:		Line 40:

	::Because at the end of the day you'd end up semi-protecting the pages, and the bible part of the site should not be edited anyway. Just my 2 cents. [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 15:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)		::Because at the end of the day you'd end up semi-protecting the pages, and the bible part of the site should not be edited anyway. Just my 2 cents. [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 15:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

			== What's the status of the site? ==
			Hi Nick, I was wondering what is happening these days with your site. The home page says all Bible believers can freely edit the articles. However, when I went to the articles, they were all locked. So I was hoping you can clarify this issue for me, and make some changes so there is no contradiction. God bless you. [[Special:Contributions/203.76.178.136\|203.76.178.136]] 09:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC) -Joseph

Bennylin: /* Anonymous editing */

2011-07-24T15:04:16Z

Anonymous editing

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:04, 24 July 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:Hi Bennylin. Thanks for your input. I have left the anon editing open, trying to be much like Wikipedia. I was hoping more people would edit. It is definatly an option to consider! I will think over it in the next few months [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 10:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)		:Hi Bennylin. Thanks for your input. I have left the anon editing open, trying to be much like Wikipedia. I was hoping more people would edit. It is definatly an option to consider! I will think over it in the next few months [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 10:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

			::Because at the end of the day you'd end up semi-protecting the pages, and the bible part of the site should not be edited anyway. Just my 2 cents. [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 15:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Nick: /* Anonymous editing */

2011-07-23T10:22:41Z

Anonymous editing

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:22, 23 July 2011
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Seeing that most of the anon editing are vandal, I think it's better to turn off the anonymous editing. What do you think? [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 09:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)		Seeing that most of the anon editing are vandal, I think it's better to turn off the anonymous editing. What do you think? [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 09:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

			:Hi Bennylin. Thanks for your input. I have left the anon editing open, trying to be much like Wikipedia. I was hoping more people would edit. It is definatly an option to consider! I will think over it in the next few months [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 10:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Bennylin: /* Anonymous editing */ new section

2011-07-21T09:05:33Z

Anonymous editing: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 21 July 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._A._Waite here], we should defend this article. Of course there are some errors in his books, maybe to many, but every body do mistakes, and he is important enough. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 19:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)		See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._A._Waite here], we should defend this article. Of course there are some errors in his books, maybe to many, but every body do mistakes, and he is important enough. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 19:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
	:I commented on Wikipedia - under strong keep. Your weight on the issue may help, as you have some influence there. [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 00:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)		:I commented on Wikipedia - under strong keep. Your weight on the issue may help, as you have some influence there. [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 00:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

			== Anonymous editing ==

			Seeing that most of the anon editing are vandal, I think it's better to turn off the anonymous editing. What do you think? [[User:Bennylin\|Bennylin]] 09:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Nick: /* Waite */

2010-04-10T00:21:11Z

Waite

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 10 April 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	== Waite ==		== Waite ==
	See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._A._Waite here], we should defend this article. Of course there are some errors in his books, maybe to many, but every body do mistakes, and he is important enough. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 19:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)		See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._A._Waite here], we should defend this article. Of course there are some errors in his books, maybe to many, but every body do mistakes, and he is important enough. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 19:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
			:I commented on Wikipedia - under strong keep. Your weight on the issue may help, as you have some influence there. [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 00:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Leszek Jańczuk: /* Ezek 13:8 */

2010-04-09T19:11:24Z

Ezek 13:8

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 9 April 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Protected just means that people have to create an account to edit it. I usually try and do that for every page. I leave it open at first, becauee some poeple don't know how to sign up. But after content is made on a page, I usually protect it. Thanks for you contibutions, keep them coming! [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 19:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)		Protected just means that people have to create an account to edit it. I usually try and do that for every page. I leave it open at first, becauee some poeple don't know how to sign up. But after content is made on a page, I usually protect it. Thanks for you contibutions, keep them coming! [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 19:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

			== Waite ==
			See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/D._A._Waite here], we should defend this article. Of course there are some errors in his books, maybe to many, but every body do mistakes, and he is important enough. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 19:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Nick: /* Ezek 13:8 */

2010-03-26T19:24:17Z

Ezek 13:8

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 26 March 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I'm not sure what that means, can you please explain it to me? Something about being protected maybe?		I'm not sure what that means, can you please explain it to me? Something about being protected maybe?

			Protected just means that people have to create an account to edit it. I usually try and do that for every page. I leave it open at first, becauee some poeple don't know how to sign up. But after content is made on a page, I usually protect it. Thanks for you contibutions, keep them coming! [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 19:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Dr.bray: /* Thank you */

2010-03-25T13:52:59Z

Thank you

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 25 March 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Thank you ==		== Thank you ==
	I just wanted to thank you for editing my posts. I'm not that good with formatting on wiki's yet and i really appreciate the work you do in making my posts more standard. I'm sorry if my posts are a trouble for you. [[User:Dr.bray\|Dr.bray]]		I just wanted to thank you for editing my posts. I'm not that good with formatting on wiki's yet and i really appreciate the work you do in making my posts more standard. I'm sorry if my posts are a trouble for you. [[User:Dr.bray\|Dr.bray]]

			== Ezek 13:8 ==
			I noticed that my article on Ezek 13:8 has this in the log...

			(Protection log); 12:09 . . Nick (Talk \| contribs) protected "Ezekiel 13:18" ([edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

			I'm not sure what that means, can you please explain it to me? Something about being protected maybe?

Dr.bray: /* Main page */

2010-03-16T14:32:07Z

Main page

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 16 March 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Main page ==		== Main page ==
	Now is much better. Good idea. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 23:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)		Now is much better. Good idea. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 23:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

			== Thank you ==
			I just wanted to thank you for editing my posts. I'm not that good with formatting on wiki's yet and i really appreciate the work you do in making my posts more standard. I'm sorry if my posts are a trouble for you. [[User:Dr.bray\|Dr.bray]]

Leszek Jańczuk: /* Hi Leszek */

2009-09-15T23:40:47Z

Hi Leszek

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 15 September 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Hi Leszek==		==Hi Leszek==
	Hey there Leszek, my ultimate goal is to make the scriptures, based upon the KJV/TR, easily accessable on the site, in all languages, and with all words linked to original word meanings and study helps. I know there is error in both KJV and MV camps. From what I have seen, many are focusing their efforts discrediting the other camp, where I thought it would be good to focus energy to promote the scriptures in all languages. While I do follow the KJV I am not an onlyist. I suppose I hold the position that the Dean Burgon Society holds. Some KJV arguments make sense and some MV make sense. I hope to put all sides of these arguments on this site, so that someone researching can make an informed conclusion, so that if James Whites articles were placed up along D.A. Waite's, people would be able to then search through both. Although, ultimately the sites general articles will favor the KJV/TR position, and will be linked to in all articles. So say where White calls Easter Pagan, the word Easter itself will be hyperlinked to other articles favoring Easter. But Also Jack Moormans articles claiming Easter is Pagan, will have the same, so hopefully by having all point of views, we can learn what the extremes on both sides are. [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 12:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)		Hey there Leszek, my ultimate goal is to make the scriptures, based upon the KJV/TR, easily accessable on the site, in all languages, and with all words linked to original word meanings and study helps. I know there is error in both KJV and MV camps. From what I have seen, many are focusing their efforts discrediting the other camp, where I thought it would be good to focus energy to promote the scriptures in all languages. While I do follow the KJV I am not an onlyist. I suppose I hold the position that the Dean Burgon Society holds. Some KJV arguments make sense and some MV make sense. I hope to put all sides of these arguments on this site, so that someone researching can make an informed conclusion, so that if James Whites articles were placed up along D.A. Waite's, people would be able to then search through both. Although, ultimately the sites general articles will favor the KJV/TR position, and will be linked to in all articles. So say where White calls Easter Pagan, the word Easter itself will be hyperlinked to other articles favoring Easter. But Also Jack Moormans articles claiming Easter is Pagan, will have the same, so hopefully by having all point of views, we can learn what the extremes on both sides are. [[User:Nick\|Nick]] 12:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

			== Main page ==
			Now is much better. Good idea. [[User:Leszek Jańczuk\|Leszek Jańczuk]] 23:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)