The New Testament in the Original Greek - Revision history

Beza 1598: /* External links */

2016-03-10T11:22:56Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 10 March 2016
Line 69:		Line 69:
	[[Category:Textual criticism]]		[[Category:Textual criticism]]
	[[Category:1881 books]]		[[Category:1881 books]]

			{{Donate}}

Nick at 12:54, 8 March 2016

2016-03-08T12:54:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 8 March 2016
Line 62:		Line 62:
	; Sortable articles		; Sortable articles
	* [http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts.html Bible Version Verse Comparison Charts]		* [http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts.html Bible Version Verse Comparison Charts]
	* [http://openscriptures.org/prototypes/manuscript-comparator/ Comparison of the ~~Wescott~~/Hort text with other manuscript editions] on the Manuscript Comparator		* [http://openscriptures.org/prototypes/manuscript-comparator/ Comparison of the Westcott/Hort text with other manuscript editions] on the Manuscript Comparator
	* [http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/GNT/books.html Greek Text of Hort's "The New Testament in the Original Greek", Vol. 1] with variants		* [http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/GNT/books.html Greek Text of Hort's "The New Testament in the Original Greek", Vol. 1] with variants

Nick at 13:06, 8 December 2012

2012-12-08T13:06:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 8 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''''The New Testament in the Original Greek''''' is the name of a Greek-language version of the [[New Testament]] published in [[1881 AD\|1881]]. It is also known as the '''[[Westcott and Hort]]''' text, after its editors [[Brooke Foss Westcott]] ([[1825 AD\|1825]]–[[1901 AD\|1901]]) and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]] ([[1828 AD\|1828]]–[[1892 AD\|1892]]). It is a [[Textual criticism\|critical text]], compiled from some of the oldest New Testament fragments and texts that had been discovered at the time. The two editors worked together for 28 years.

	~~'''''The New Testament in the Original Greek''''' is the name of a Greek-language version of the~~ [[~~New Testament]] published in 1881. It is also known as the '''~~Westcott and Hort~~''' text, after its editors [[Brooke Foss Westcott~~]] ~~(1825–1901) and~~ [~~[Fenton John Anthony Hort]] (1828–1892).~~ It is ~~a [[Textual criticism\|critical text~~]~~], compiled from some~~ of the ~~oldest~~ New Testament ~~fragments and texts that had been discovered at~~ the ~~time. The two editors worked together~~ for ~~28 years~~.		[[Westcott and Hort]] state: "[It is] our belief that even among the numerous unquestionably spurious readings of the New Testament there are no signs of deliberate falsification of the text for dogmatic purposes."<sup>[1]</sup>

	~~Westcott and~~ Hort ~~state: "[It is~~] ~~our belief that even among the numerous unquestionably spurious readings of the New Testament there are no signs of deliberate falsification of the text for dogmatic purposes."<sup>[~~]~~</sup>~~		According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]], "Knowledge of Documents should precede Final Judgments upon Readings". Two manuscripts were favoured by [[Westcott and Hort]]: [[Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209\|Vaticanus]] and [[Codex Sinaiticus\|Sinaiticus]]. They also believed that the combination of [[Codex Bezae]] with the [[Vetus Latina\|Old Latin]] and the [[Peshitta\|Old Syriac]] represents the original form of the New Testament text, especially when it is shorter than other forms of the text, such as the majority of the [[Byzantine text-type]],<sup>[2]</sup> as one of the primary principles of their fledgling textual criticism was ''[[lectio brevior]]'', sometimes taken to an extreme, such as in the theory of [[Western non-interpolations]], which has since been rejected.<sup>[3]</sup>

	~~According to Hort~~, "Knowledge of Documents should precede Final Judgments upon Readings". Two manuscripts were favoured by Westcott and Hort: [[Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209\|Vaticanus]] and [[Codex Sinaiticus\|Sinaiticus]]. They also believed that the combination of [[Codex Bezae]] with the [[Vetus Latina\|Old Latin]] and the [[Peshitta\|Old Syriac]] represents the original form of the New Testament text, especially when it is shorter than other forms of the text, such as the majority of the [[Byzantine text-type]],<sup>[]</sup> as one of the primary principles of their fledgling textual criticism was ''[[lectio brevior]]'', sometimes taken to an extreme, such as in the theory of [[Western non-interpolations]], which has since been rejected.<sup>[]</sup>

	== WH edition ==		== WH edition ==
	[[Image:Wyh.jpg\|thumb\|[[Brooke Foss Westcott]] and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]]]]		[[Image:Wyh.jpg\|thumb\|[[Brooke Foss Westcott]] and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]]]]

	Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. The most recent is Syrian, or [[Byzantine text-type]], of which the newest example (thus from ~~the~~ critical text view less reliable) is the [[Textus Receptus]]. The [[Western text-type]] is much older, but tends to paraphrase, so according to them also lacks dependability. The [[Alexandrian text-type]], exemplified in the [[Codex Ephraemi]], exhibits a polished Greek style. The two scholars identified their favorite text type as "Neutral text", exemplified by the two 4th century manuscripts codex Vaticanus (known to scholars since the 15th century) and [[Codex Sinaiticus]] (discovered only in 1859), both of which they relied on heavily but not exclusively for this edition. This text has only a few changes of the original.<sup>[]</sup> This edition is based on the critical works especially of Tischendorf and Tregelles.<sup>[]</sup>		[[Westcott and Hort]] distinguished four text types in their studies. The most recent is Syrian, or [[Byzantine text-type]], of which the newest example (thus from their false critical text view less reliable) is the [[Textus Receptus]]. The [[Western text-type]] is supposedly much older, but tends to paraphrase, so according to them also lacks dependability. The [[Alexandrian text-type]], exemplified in the [[Codex Ephraemi]], exhibits a polished Greek style. The two scholars identified their favorite text type as "Neutral text", exemplified by the two 4th century manuscripts [[Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209\|codex Vaticanus]] (known to scholars since the 15th century) and [[Codex Sinaiticus]] (discovered only in [[1859 AD\|1859]]), both of which they relied on heavily but not exclusively for this edition. This text has only a few changes of the original.<sup>[4]</sup> This edition is based on the critical works especially of [[Constantin von Tischendorf\|Tischendorf]] and [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]].<sup>[4]</sup>

	Westcott and Hort worked on their Testament from 1853 until its completion in 1881.<sup>[]</sup> It was followed by an ''Introduction and Appendix'' by Hort appearing in a second volume in 1882. In 1892, a revised edition was released by [[Francis Crawford Burkitt\|F. C. Burkitt]].		[[Westcott and Hort]] worked on their Testament from [[1853 AD\|1853]] until its completion in [[1881 AD\|1881]].<sup>[5]</sup> It was followed by an ''Introduction and Appendix'' by Hort appearing in a second volume in [[1882 AD\|1882]]. In [[1892 AD\|1892]], a revised edition was released by [[Francis Crawford Burkitt\|F. C. Burkitt]].

	== Reception ==		== Reception ==

	The edition of Westcott and Hort began a new epoch in the history of textual criticism.<sup>[]</sup>		The edition of [[Westcott and Hort]] began a new epoch in the history of textual criticism.<sup>[4]</sup>

	All critical editions published after Westcott and Hort closely follow the text of The New Testament in the Original Greek with the exception of the text edited by [[Hermann von Soden]]. Soden's edition stands much closer to the text of [[Constantin von Tischendorf\|Tischendorf]] than to the text of Westcott and Hort. All editions of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]] remain close in textual character to the text WH. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] reports that, while NA25 text shows, for example, 2,047 differences from von Soden, 1,996 from Vogels, 1,268 from Tischendorf, 1,161 from Bover, and 770 from Merk, it contains only 558 differences from WH text.<sup>[]</sup>		All critical editions published after [[Westcott and Hort]] closely follow the text of The New Testament in the Original Greek with the exception of the text edited by [[Hermann von Soden]]. Soden's edition stands much closer to the text of [[Constantin von Tischendorf\|Tischendorf]] than to the text of [[Westcott and Hort]]. All editions of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]] remain close in textual character to the text WH. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] reports that, while NA25 text shows, for example, 2,047 differences from von Soden, 1,996 from Vogels, 1,268 from [[Constantin von Tischendorf\|Tischendorf]], 1,161 from Bover, and 770 from Merk, it contains only 558 differences from WH text.<sup>[6]</sup>

	According to [[Bruce M. Metzger]], "the general validity of their critical principles and procedures is widely acknowledged by scholars today."<sup>[]</sup>		According to [[Bruce M. Metzger]], "the general validity of their critical principles and procedures is widely acknowledged by scholars today."<sup>[7]</sup>
	In 1981 Metzger said:		In [[1981 AD\|1981]] [[Bruce M. Metzger\|Metzger]] said:
	~~<blockquote>~~“The international committee that produced the ''United Bible Societies'' Greek New Testament, not only adopted the Westcott and Hort edition as its basic text, but followed their methodology in giving attention to both external and internal consideration”.<sup>[]</sup>
	~~</blockquote~~>		::“The international committee that produced the ''[[United Bible Societies]]'' Greek New Testament, not only adopted the [[Westcott and Hort]] edition as its basic text, but followed their methodology in giving attention to both external and internal consideration”.<sup>[8]</sup>

	[[Philip Comfort]] gave this opinion:		[[Philip Comfort]] gave this opinion:
	~~<blockquote>~~
	The text produced by Westcott and Hort is still to this day, even with so many more manuscript discoveries, a very close reproduction of the primitive text of the New Testament. Of course, I think they gave too much weight to Codex Vaticanus alone, and this needs to be tempered. This criticism aside, the Westcott and Hort text is extremely reliable. (...) In many instances where I would disagree with the working in the Nestle / UBS text in favor of a particular variant reading, I would later check with the Westcott and Hort text and realize that they had often come to the same decision. (...) Of course, the manuscript discoveries of the past one hundred years have changed things, but it is remarkable how often they have affirmed the decisions of Westcott and Hort.<sup>[]</sup>		::The text produced by [[Westcott and Hort]] is still to this day, even with so many more manuscript discoveries, a very close reproduction of the primitive text of the New Testament. Of course, I think they gave too much weight to [[Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209\|Codex Vaticanus]] alone, and this needs to be tempered. This criticism aside, the [[Westcott and Hort]] text is extremely reliable. (...) In many instances where I would disagree with the working in the Nestle / UBS text in favor of a particular variant reading, I would later check with the [[Westcott and Hort]] text and realize that they had often come to the same decision. (...) Of course, the manuscript discoveries of the past one hundred years have changed things, but it is remarkable how often they have affirmed the decisions of [[Westcott and Hort]].<sup>[9]</sup>
	~~</blockquote~~>

	== Other editions of Greek New Testament ==		== Other editions of Greek New Testament ==

	The text of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]], and the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from the text of the Westcott-Hort.<sup>[]</sup>		The text of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]], and the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from the text of the Westcott-Hort.<sup>[10]</sup>

	== See also ==		== See also ==
Line 41:		Line 39:
	== References ==		== References ==

			* 1. Brooke Foss Westcott, Fenton John Anthony Hort, ''The New Testament in the Original Greek: Introduction, Appendix, p. 282.
			* 2. Aland, Kurt; and Barbara Aland; Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.) (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans. p. 236.
			* 3. Aland, Kurt and Barbara. The Text of the New Testament, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1995, p. 33
			* 4. H. Schumacher, A Handbook of Scripture Study (B. Herder Book Co.: St. Louis-London 1923), p. 53.
			* 5. Metzger, Bruce M.; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978-0-19-516122-9.
			* 6. K. Aland & B. Aland, Text of the New Testament, pp. 26-30.
			* 7. Bruce M. Metzger, The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, p. 136.
			* 8. B. M. Metzger, cited by James Brooks, Bible Interpreters of the 20th century, p. 264.
			* 9. Philip Comfort, Encountering the Manuscripts: An Introduction to New Testament Paleography & Textual Criticism, (Nashville, 2005), p. 100.
			* 10. Robert Waltz

	== Further reading ==		== Further reading ==

Nick: /* WH edition */

2012-12-08T12:50:29Z

WH edition

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 8 December 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	== WH edition ==		== WH edition ==
	[[~~File~~:Wyh.jpg\|thumb\|[[Brooke Foss Westcott]] and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]]]]		[[Image:Wyh.jpg\|thumb\|[[Brooke Foss Westcott]] and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]]]]

	Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. The most recent is Syrian, or [[Byzantine text-type]], of which the newest example (thus from the critical text view less reliable) is the [[Textus Receptus]]. The [[Western text-type]] is much older, but tends to paraphrase, so according to them also lacks dependability. The [[Alexandrian text-type]], exemplified in the [[Codex Ephraemi]], exhibits a polished Greek style. The two scholars identified their favorite text type as "Neutral text", exemplified by the two 4th century manuscripts codex Vaticanus (known to scholars since the 15th century) and [[Codex Sinaiticus]] (discovered only in 1859), both of which they relied on heavily but not exclusively for this edition. This text has only a few changes of the original.<sup>[]</sup> This edition is based on the critical works especially of Tischendorf and Tregelles.<sup>[]</sup>		Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. The most recent is Syrian, or [[Byzantine text-type]], of which the newest example (thus from the critical text view less reliable) is the [[Textus Receptus]]. The [[Western text-type]] is much older, but tends to paraphrase, so according to them also lacks dependability. The [[Alexandrian text-type]], exemplified in the [[Codex Ephraemi]], exhibits a polished Greek style. The two scholars identified their favorite text type as "Neutral text", exemplified by the two 4th century manuscripts codex Vaticanus (known to scholars since the 15th century) and [[Codex Sinaiticus]] (discovered only in 1859), both of which they relied on heavily but not exclusively for this edition. This text has only a few changes of the original.<sup>[]</sup> This edition is based on the critical works especially of Tischendorf and Tregelles.<sup>[]</sup>

Nick at 12:49, 8 December 2012

2012-12-08T12:49:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 8 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{Italic title}}~~
	'''''The New Testament in the Original Greek''''' is the name of a Greek-language version of the [[New Testament]] published in 1881. It is also known as the '''Westcott and Hort''' text, after its editors [[Brooke Foss Westcott]] (1825–1901) and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]] (1828–1892). It is a [[Textual criticism\|critical text]], compiled from some of the oldest New Testament fragments and texts that had been discovered at the time. The two editors worked together for 28 years.		'''''The New Testament in the Original Greek''''' is the name of a Greek-language version of the [[New Testament]] published in 1881. It is also known as the '''Westcott and Hort''' text, after its editors [[Brooke Foss Westcott]] (1825–1901) and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]] (1828–1892). It is a [[Textual criticism\|critical text]], compiled from some of the oldest New Testament fragments and texts that had been discovered at the time. The two editors worked together for 28 years.

Nick at 03:46, 8 December 2012

2012-12-08T03:46:47Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:46, 8 December 2012
Line 1:	Line 1:
		{{Italic title}}
		'''''The New Testament in the Original Greek''''' is the name of a Greek-language version of the [[New Testament]] published in 1881. It is also known as the '''Westcott and Hort''' text, after its editors [[Brooke Foss Westcott]] (1825–1901) and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]] (1828–1892). It is a [[Textual criticism\|critical text]], compiled from some of the oldest New Testament fragments and texts that had been discovered at the time. The two editors worked together for 28 years.

		Westcott and Hort state: "[It is] our belief that even among the numerous unquestionably spurious readings of the New Testament there are no signs of deliberate falsification of the text for dogmatic purposes."<sup>[]</sup>

		According to Hort, "Knowledge of Documents should precede Final Judgments upon Readings". Two manuscripts were favoured by Westcott and Hort: [[Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209\|Vaticanus]] and [[Codex Sinaiticus\|Sinaiticus]]. They also believed that the combination of [[Codex Bezae]] with the [[Vetus Latina\|Old Latin]] and the [[Peshitta\|Old Syriac]] represents the original form of the New Testament text, especially when it is shorter than other forms of the text, such as the majority of the [[Byzantine text-type]],<sup>[]</sup> as one of the primary principles of their fledgling textual criticism was ''[[lectio brevior]]'', sometimes taken to an extreme, such as in the theory of [[Western non-interpolations]], which has since been rejected.<sup>[]</sup>

		== WH edition ==
		[[File:Wyh.jpg\|thumb\|[[Brooke Foss Westcott]] and [[Fenton John Anthony Hort]]]]

		Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. The most recent is Syrian, or [[Byzantine text-type]], of which the newest example (thus from the critical text view less reliable) is the [[Textus Receptus]]. The [[Western text-type]] is much older, but tends to paraphrase, so according to them also lacks dependability. The [[Alexandrian text-type]], exemplified in the [[Codex Ephraemi]], exhibits a polished Greek style. The two scholars identified their favorite text type as "Neutral text", exemplified by the two 4th century manuscripts codex Vaticanus (known to scholars since the 15th century) and [[Codex Sinaiticus]] (discovered only in 1859), both of which they relied on heavily but not exclusively for this edition. This text has only a few changes of the original.<sup>[]</sup> This edition is based on the critical works especially of Tischendorf and Tregelles.<sup>[]</sup>

		Westcott and Hort worked on their Testament from 1853 until its completion in 1881.<sup>[]</sup> It was followed by an ''Introduction and Appendix'' by Hort appearing in a second volume in 1882. In 1892, a revised edition was released by [[Francis Crawford Burkitt\|F. C. Burkitt]].

		== Reception ==

		The edition of Westcott and Hort began a new epoch in the history of textual criticism.<sup>[]</sup>

		All critical editions published after Westcott and Hort closely follow the text of The New Testament in the Original Greek with the exception of the text edited by [[Hermann von Soden]]. Soden's edition stands much closer to the text of [[Constantin von Tischendorf\|Tischendorf]] than to the text of Westcott and Hort. All editions of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]] remain close in textual character to the text WH. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] reports that, while NA25 text shows, for example, 2,047 differences from von Soden, 1,996 from Vogels, 1,268 from Tischendorf, 1,161 from Bover, and 770 from Merk, it contains only 558 differences from WH text.<sup>[]</sup>

		According to [[Bruce M. Metzger]], "the general validity of their critical principles and procedures is widely acknowledged by scholars today."<sup>[]</sup>
		In 1981 Metzger said:
		<blockquote>“The international committee that produced the ''United Bible Societies'' Greek New Testament, not only adopted the Westcott and Hort edition as its basic text, but followed their methodology in giving attention to both external and internal consideration”.<sup>[]</sup>
		</blockquote>

		[[Philip Comfort]] gave this opinion:
		<blockquote>
		The text produced by Westcott and Hort is still to this day, even with so many more manuscript discoveries, a very close reproduction of the primitive text of the New Testament. Of course, I think they gave too much weight to Codex Vaticanus alone, and this needs to be tempered. This criticism aside, the Westcott and Hort text is extremely reliable. (...) In many instances where I would disagree with the working in the Nestle / UBS text in favor of a particular variant reading, I would later check with the Westcott and Hort text and realize that they had often come to the same decision. (...) Of course, the manuscript discoveries of the past one hundred years have changed things, but it is remarkable how often they have affirmed the decisions of Westcott and Hort.<sup>[]</sup>
		</blockquote>

		== Other editions of Greek New Testament ==

		The text of [[Novum Testamentum Graece\|Nestle-Aland]], and the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from the text of the Westcott-Hort.<sup>[]</sup>

		== See also ==
		* [[Editio Regia]]
		* [[Novum Instrumentum omne]]
		* [[Editio Octava Critica Maior]]
		* [[Novum Testamentum Graece]]

		== References ==


		== Further reading ==

		* Palmer, Edwin Palmer, [http://www.amazon.com/dp/1843560232 ΚΑΙΝΗ ΔΙΑΘΗΚΗ. The Greek Testament] with the Readings Adopted by the Revisers of the Authorised Version. London: Simon Wallenberg Press, 2007. ISBN 1-84356-023-2

		== External links ==
		; Editions
		* [http://www.archive.org/stream/newtestamentinor00westrich#page/n5/mode/2up The New Testament In The Original Greek (New York 1882)]
		* [http://books.google.com/books?id=0xtVAAAAMAAJ&dq=The+New+Testament+in+the+original+Greek+By+Brooke+Foss+Westcott,+Fenton+John+Anthony+Hort&lr=&as_brr=1&source=gbs_summary_s&cad=0 The New Testament in the original Greek: the text revised by Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort], Published by Macmillan, 1907.
		* [http://www.archive.org/details/newtestamentinth027928mbp The New Testament In The Original Greek (1925)]

		; Sortable articles
		* [http://av1611.com/kjbp/charts.html Bible Version Verse Comparison Charts]
		* [http://openscriptures.org/prototypes/manuscript-comparator/ Comparison of the Wescott/Hort text with other manuscript editions] on the Manuscript Comparator
		* [http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/GNT/books.html Greek Text of Hort's "The New Testament in the Original Greek", Vol. 1] with variants

		{{DEFAULTSORT:New Testament in the Original Greek}}
		[[Category:Greek New Testament]]
		[[Category:Textual criticism]]
		[[Category:1881 books]]

Nick: Protected "The New Testament in the Original Greek" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2009-09-11T12:15:55Z

Protected "The New Testament in the Original Greek" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:15, 11 September 2009
(No difference)

Nick: Removing all content from page

2009-09-11T12:15:51Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 11 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~UgM5fz <a href="http://pydxgkvipxop.com/">pydxgkvipxop</a>, [url=http://xrygrldhmxzy.com/]xrygrldhmxzy[/url], [link=http://nbwnorrjwhke.com/]nbwnorrjwhke[/link], http://xfwocewvrdta.com/~~

208.82.100.141: WGTxHJEsTs

2009-09-11T08:39:17Z

WGTxHJEsTs

New page

UgM5fz <a href="http://pydxgkvipxop.com/">pydxgkvipxop</a>, [url=http://xrygrldhmxzy.com/]xrygrldhmxzy[/url], [link=http://nbwnorrjwhke.com/]nbwnorrjwhke[/link], http://xfwocewvrdta.com/