Romans 2:26 - Revision history

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

2018-04-20T16:17:04Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 20 April 2018
Line 285:		Line 285:

	==External Links==		==External Links==
			* [http://www.standardbearers.net/uploads/Ahaziahs_Age_Upon_His_Accession_Chronology_of_the_OT_Dr_Floyd_Nolen_Jones_PhD_ThD.pdf Ahaziahs Age Upon His Accession Chronology of the OT] by Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones


			{{Donate}}

Beza 1598 at 12:53, 21 February 2017

2017-02-21T12:53:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 21 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* '''[[Romans 2:26 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΡΩΜΑΙΟΥΣ 2:26]]''' ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ οὐχί ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται		* '''[[Romans 2:26 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΡΩΜΑΙΟΥΣ 2:26]]''' ἐὰν οὖν ἡ ἀκροβυστία τὰ δικαιώματα τοῦ νόμου φυλάσσῃ οὐχί ἡ ἀκροβυστία αὐτοῦ εἰς περιτομὴν λογισθήσεται

	~~<small>''([[~~Textus Receptus (1598~~)\|Textus Receptus]], [[Theodore Beza]], [[1598 AD\|1598]])''</small>~~		{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}

	* ''' Romans 2:26 ''' Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?		* ''' Romans 2:26 ''' Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?

	~~<small>''([[~~King James Version~~]], [[~~Pure Cambridge Edition~~]] [[1900 AD\|1900]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	* '''[[ Romans 2:26 ~~(TRV)~~\|Romans 2:26]]''' Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?		* '''[[ Romans 2:26 King James Version 2016\|Romans 2:26]]''' Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?

	~~<small>''([[Textus Receptus~~ Version~~]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598: /* Theodore Beza */

2017-01-04T13:10:25Z

Theodore Beza

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[Romans 2:~~26B eza~~ 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 2:26 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

Beza 1598: /* Theodore Beza */

2017-01-04T13:10:16Z

Theodore Beza

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:~~1 Beza~~ 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 2:26B eza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

Beza 1598: /* English Translations */

2014-06-02T07:01:55Z

English Translations

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 2 June 2014
Line 171:		Line 171:
	* [[1982 AD\|1982]] ([[New King James Version]])		* [[1982 AD\|1982]] ([[New King James Version]])

	* [[1984 AD\|1984]] ~~So then, if those who are not circumcised keep the law’s requirements, will they not be regarded as though they were circumcised?~~ ([[New International Version]])		* [[1984 AD\|1984]] ([[New International Version]])

	* [[1995 AD\|1995]] ~~So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?~~ ([[New American Standard Bible]]) (©1995)		* [[1995 AD\|1995]] ([[New American Standard Bible]]) (©1995)

	* [[1999 AD\|1999]] ([[American King James Version]])[[AKJV]]		* [[1999 AD\|1999]] ([[American King James Version]])[[AKJV]]
Line 180:		Line 180:

	* ([[BBE]])		* ([[BBE]])
	* ~~Therefore if an uncircumcised man keeps the law’s requirements, will his uncircumcision not be counted as circumcision?~~ ([[Holman Christian Standard Bible]])		* ([[Holman Christian Standard Bible]])
	* ~~Therefore if the Uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?~~ ([[21st Century King James Version]])		* ([[21st Century King James Version]])
	* ~~So if the person who isn’t circumcised keeps the Law, won’t his status of not being circumcised be counted as if he were circumcised?~~ ([[Common English Bible]])		* ([[Common English Bible]])
	* ~~So if a man does what those laws demand, won’t he be considered circumcised even if he is uncircumcised?~~ ([[GOD’S WORD Translation]])		* ([[GOD’S WORD Translation]])
	* ~~In fact, if they obey the Law, they are as good as anyone who is circumcised.~~ ([[Contemporary English Version]])		* ([[Contemporary English Version]])
	* ~~And if the Gentiles obey God’s law, won’t God declare them to be his own people?~~ ([[New Living Translation]])		* ([[New Living Translation]])
	* ~~So if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be credited to him as [equivalent to] circumcision?~~ ([[Amplified Bible]])		* ([[Amplified Bible]])
	* 25-29 Circumcision, the surgical ritual that marks you as a Jew, is great if you live in accord with God’s law. But if you don’t, it’s worse than not being circumcised. The reverse is also true: The uncircumcised who keep God’s ways are as good as the circumcised—in fact, better. Better to keep God’s law uncircumcised than break it circumcised. Don’t you see: It’s not the cut of a knife that makes a Jew. You become a Jew by who you are. It’s the mark of God on your heart, not of a knife on your skin, that makes a Jew. And recognition comes from God, not legalistic critics. ([[The Message]])		* ([[The Message]])
	* ~~Sometimes those who aren’t circumcised do what the law requires. Won’t God accept them as if they had been circumcised?~~ ([[New International Reader's Version]])		* ([[New International Reader's Version]])
	* ([[Wycliffe New Testament]])		* ([[Wycliffe New Testament]])

Beza 1598: /* Aramaic */

2013-07-02T12:56:41Z

Aramaic

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 2 July 2013
Line 197:		Line 197:

	====[[Aramaic]]====		====[[Aramaic]]====
	* <big></big>(Aramaic Peshitta)		* ܐܢ ܗܘ ܕܝܢ ܕܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ ܬܛܪ ܦܘܩܕܢܗ ܕܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܐ ܗܐ ܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ ܡܬܚܫܒܐ ܠܗ ܓܙܘܪܬܐ <big></big>(Aramaic Peshitta)

	====[[Basque]]====		====[[Basque]]====

Beza 1598: /* Arabic */

2013-07-02T12:55:28Z

Arabic

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 2 July 2013
Line 194:		Line 194:

	====[[Arabic]]====		====[[Arabic]]====
	* <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)		* اذا ان كان الاغرل يحفظ احكام الناموس أفما تحسب غرلته ختانا. <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

	====[[Aramaic]]====		====[[Aramaic]]====

Beza 1598: /* Bulgarian */

2013-07-02T12:55:13Z

Bulgarian

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 2 July 2013
Line 205:		Line 205:
	====[[Bulgarian]]====		====[[Bulgarian]]====

	* [[1940 AD\|1940]] (Bulgarian Bible)		* [[1940 AD\|1940]] И тъй, ако необрязаният пази наредбите на закона, не ще ли неговото необрязване да му се вмени за обрязване? (Bulgarian Bible)

	====[[Chinese]]====		====[[Chinese]]====

Beza 1598: /* Basque */

2013-07-02T12:55:05Z

Basque

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 2 July 2013
Line 201:		Line 201:
	====[[Basque]]====		====[[Basque]]====

	*		* Bada baldin preputioac Leguearen ordenançác beguira baditza, haren preputioa ezta circoncisionetan estimaturen?

	====[[Bulgarian]]====		====[[Bulgarian]]====

Beza 1598: /* Latin */

2013-07-02T12:54:56Z

Latin

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 2 July 2013
Line 241:		Line 241:
	====[[Latin]]====		====[[Latin]]====

	* [[Latin Vulgate]]		* si igitur praeputium iustitias legis custodiat nonne praeputium illius in circumcisionem reputabitur [[Latin Vulgate]]

	* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)		* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[Romans 2:~~26B eza~~ 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 2:26 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:~~1 Beza~~ 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 2:26B eza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)