Minuscule 1 - Revision history

Nick: Redirecting to Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2

2011-12-30T06:57:40Z

Redirecting to Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:57, 30 December 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~[[Image:Codex Basiliensis A.N.IV.2.PNG\|300px\|thumb\|right\|Coddex Basiliensis, 12th Century manuscript of the [[New Testament]]]]~~		#REDIRECT [[Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2]]
	'''Minuscule 1''' (in the [[Gregory-Aland numbering]]), δ 254 ([[Biblical manuscript#Von Soden\|von Soden]]); formerly it was designated by 1<sup>eap</sup> (to distinguish it from [[Minuscule 2814\|minuscule 1<sup>rK</sup>]], which previously used number 1). It is a [[Greek]] [[Lower case\|minuscule]] [[manuscript]] of the [[New Testament]], usually dated [[Paleography\|paleographically]] to the 12th century.<sup>[1]</sup>

	~~The [[codex]] is located now at the [[Basel University Library]] at [[Basel]] with the shelf number A. N. IV, 2 (earlier B. VI. 27).<sup>[2]</sup>~~

	~~== Description ==~~

	The codex contains the entire [[New Testament]] except of [[Book of Revelation]] in the order: [[Gospel]]s, [[Acts of the Apostles]], [[General epistles]], and [[Pauline epistles]] ([[Epistle to the Hebrews\|Hebrews]] is the last book in Paul). Written in one column per page, 38 lines per page, on 297 parchment leaves (18.5 by 11.5 cm),<sup>[1]</sup> with a beautiful miniatures which were stolen before [[1860 AD\|1860]]-[[1862 D\|1862]], except one before [[Gospel of John]].<sup>[3]</sup> The dimensions of the text 13.6 by 6.8 cm.<sup>[2]</sup> It was written on parchment continuously and without separation in "elegant and minute" [[Lower case\|minuscule]], furnished with breathings, accents, and ascript. The initial letters are gilt, and on the first page of each Gospel the full point is a large gilt ball.<sup>[3]</sup> The Ammonian sections presented (Mark 236), but the [[Eusebian Canons]] absent. It contains Prolegomena, τιτλοι, [[Synaxarium\|synaxaria]], and pictures. [[Book of Acts\|Acts]] and epistles have the [[Euthalius\|Euthalian]] apparatus.<sup>[4]</sup>

	~~It contains a scholion questioning the authenticity of [[Mark 16\|Mark 16:9-20]]. The [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery\|Pericope Adultera]] is placed after [[John 21:25]].<sup>[1]</sup>~~

	~~== Text of the codex ==~~

	The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#~~Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].~~

	~~[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>~~
	~~According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].~~

	In [[Matthew 27:16]] it has famous textual variant "Ιησουν τον Βαραββαν". This variant contain [[Codex Koridethi]], [[Minuscule 700]], and other members of textual family [[Family 1\|''f''<sup>1</sup>]].

	~~== History of the codex ==~~
	~~[[Image:Old_University_Basel.jpg\|thumb\|Old University Basel]]~~
	Dated to the 12th century, because the frequent occurrence of enlarged letters, rounded breathing marks, flourishes, and ligatures would seem to eliminate earlier date.<sup>[2]</sup> The manuscript was presented to the monastery of the [[Dominican Order\|Preaching Friars]] by Cardinal [[John of Ragusa\|Ragusio]] (1380-1443), general of [[Dominican Order\|Dominicans]].<sup>[4]</sup> It borrowed by [[Johann Reuchlin\|Reuchlin]] and used by [[Desiderius Erasmus]] in the first edition of his [[Novum Instrumentum omne\|Novum Testamentum]] ([[1516 AD\|1516]]). In result some of its readings came to [[Textus Receptus]]. Erasmus used this codex very little, because its text was different from other manuscripts with which he was acquainted. [[Johannes Oecolampadius\| Oecolampadius]] and Gerbelius, Erasmus's subeditors, insisted to him for using more readings from this codex in the third edition, but according to Erasmus the text of this codex was altered from the Latin manuscripts, and had secondary value.<sup>[9]</sup> Since 1559 it was held in the [[University of Basel]].<sup>[4]</sup> Its later story is the same as that of [[Codex Basilensis~~]] and [[Minuscule 2]].~~

	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

	~~[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H.~~ A. ~~Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from [[Minuscule 1\|minuscule 1]]:~~
	~~: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];~~
	~~: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];~~
	~~: [[Luke 1:16]], [[Luke 1:61\|61]]; [[Luke 2:43\|2:43]]; [[Luke 9:1\|9:1]], [[Luke 9:15\|15]]; [[Luke 11:49\|11:49]];~~
	~~: [[John 1:28]]; [[John 10:8\|10:8]]; [[John 13:20\|13:20]].<sup>[13]</sup>~~

	~~== See also ==~~

	* [[List of New Testament minuscules]]
	* [[Novum Instrumentum omne]]
	* [[Textual criticism]]

	~~== References ==~~
	* 1. [[Kurt Aland\|K. Aland]], M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack, Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York [[1994 AD\|1994]], p. 47.
	* 2. Amy S. Anderson, The Textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew, Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, p. 108.
	* 3. [[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|Scrivener]], Frederick Henry Ambrose, [[A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament]], [[1894 AD\|1894]], London, p. 190-191
	* 4. C. R. Gregory, "Textkritik des Neuen Testaments", Leipzig 1900, vol. 1, p. 127.
	* 5. [[Kurt Aland]], Barbara Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", transl. Erroll F. Rhodes, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, [[1995 AD\|1995]], p. 129.
	* 6. [[Bruce Metzger\|Bruce M. Metzger]], [[Bart D. Ehrman]], "The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration", ''[[Oxford University Press]]'', [[2005 AD\|2005]], pp. 86-87.
	* 7. Griesbach, Symbolae criticae ad supplendas et corrigendas variarum N. ~~T. lectionum collectiones (Halle, 1785, 1793), 1, S. CCII-CCXXIII.~~
	* 8. Kirsopp Lake, Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies, Texts and Studies, volume vii, Cambridge, 1902, p. XXIV.
	* 9. S. P. Tregelles, An Introduction to the Critical study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures, London 1856, p. 208.
	* 10. J.J. Wettstein, Prolegomena ad Novi Testamenti Graeci, 1730, p. 57.
	* 11. John Leonard Hug, Writings of the New Testament, translated by Daniel Guildford Wait (London 1827), p. 165.
	* 12. Kirsopp Lake, Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies, Texts and Studies, volume vii, Cambridge, 1902, collates 1 with 118, 131, and 209.
	* 13. [[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]], [[A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament]], London 1894, vol. 2~~, pp. 183-184.~~

	~~== Further reading ==~~

	* [[Henri Omont]], ''Catalogue des mss grecs des bibliotheques de Suisse'', Leipzig [[1886 AD\|1886]].
	* [[Kirsopp Lake]], ''Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies'', Text and Studies VII 3, Cambridge [[1902 AD\|1902]].

	~~== External links ==~~

	* [http://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/Manuscripts1-500.html#m1 Minuscule 1] at the ''Encyclopedia of Textual Criticism''

	~~[[Category:Greek New Testament minuscules]]~~
	~~[[Category:12th-century biblical manuscripts~~]]

	~~{{Template:New Testament minuscules}}~~

Nick: /* History of the codex */

2010-03-25T12:27:48Z

History of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 25 March 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].		[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

	[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:		[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from [[Minuscule 1\|minuscule 1]]:
	: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];		: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
	: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];		: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];

Nick: /* History of the codex */

2009-12-29T08:28:28Z

History of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 29 December 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].		[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

	[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) ~~shawed~~, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:		[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:
	: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];		: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
	: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];		: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];

Nick: /* History of the codex */

2009-12-14T09:55:11Z

History of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:55, 14 December 2009
Line 26:		Line 26:

	[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) shawed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:		[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) shawed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:
	: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]], [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]], [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];		: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
	: [[Mark 7:18]].19.26; 10:1; 12:22; 15:46;		: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];
	: [[Luke 1:16]].61; 2:43; 9:1.15; 11:49;		: [[Luke 1:16]], [[Luke 1:61\|61]]; [[Luke 2:43\|2:43]]; [[Luke 9:1\|9:1]], [[Luke 9:15\|15]]; [[Luke 11:49\|11:49]];
	: [[John 1:28]]; 10:8; 13:20.<sup>[13]</sup>		: [[John 1:28]]; [[John 10:8\|10:8]]; [[John 13:20\|13:20]].<sup>[13]</sup>

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick: /* References */

2009-12-14T09:50:07Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 14 December 2009
Line 38:		Line 38:

	== References ==		== References ==
	* 1. [[Kurt Aland\|K. Aland]], M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack, ''Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments'', Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York [[1994 AD\|1994]], p. 47.
	* 2. Amy S. Anderson, ''The Textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew'', Leiden; Boston: Brill, [[2004 AD\|2004]], p. 108.
	* 3. [[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|Scrivener]], Frederick Henry Ambrose, [[A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament]], [[1894 AD\|1894]], London, p. 190-191
	* 4. [[Kurt Aland]], Barbara Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", transl. Erroll F. Rhodes, ''[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]]'', Grand Rapids, Michigan, [[1995 AD\|1995]], p. 129.
	* 5. [[Bruce Metzger\|Bruce M. Metzger]], [[Bart D. Ehrman]], "The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration", ''[[Oxford University Press]]'', [[2005 AD\|2005]], pp. 86-87.

	* 1. [[Kurt Aland\|K. Aland]], M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack, Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York [[1994 AD\|1994]], p. 47.		* 1. [[Kurt Aland\|K. Aland]], M. Welte, B. Köster, K. Junack, Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neues Testaments, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York [[1994 AD\|1994]], p. 47.
	* 2. Amy S. Anderson, The Textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew, Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, p. 108.		* 2. Amy S. Anderson, The Textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew, Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, p. 108.

Nick: /* References */

2009-12-14T09:49:55Z

References

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 * 4. [[Kurt Aland]], Barbara Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", transl. Erroll F. Rhodes, ''[[William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company]]'', Grand Rapids, Michigan, [[1995 AD|1995]], p. 129.
 * 5. [[Bruce Metzger|Bruce M. Metzger]], [[Bart D. Ehrman]], "The Text Of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration", ''[[Oxford University Press]]'', [[2005 AD|2005]], pp. 86-87.
 == Further reading ==

Nick: /* History of the codex */

2009-12-14T09:46:28Z

History of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 14 December 2009
Line 24:		Line 24:

	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].		[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

			[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) shawed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:
			: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]], [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]], [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
			: [[Mark 7:18]].19.26; 10:1; 12:22; 15:46;
			: [[Luke 1:16]].61; 2:43; 9:1.15; 11:49;
			: [[John 1:28]]; 10:8; 13:20.<sup>[13]</sup>

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nick: /* Text of the codex */

2009-12-14T09:43:10Z

Text of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 14 December 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].		The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].

	[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>]]		[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>
	According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].		According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].

Nick: /* Description */

2009-12-14T09:42:47Z

Description

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 14 December 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Description ==		== Description ==

	The codex contains the entire [[New Testament]] except of [[Book of Revelation]] in the order: [[Gospel]]s, [[Acts of the Apostles]], [[General epistles]], and [[Pauline epistles]] ([[Epistle to the Hebrews\|Hebrews]] is the last book in Paul). Written in one column per page, 38 lines per page, on 297 parchment leaves (18.5 by 11.5 cm),<sup>[1]</sup> with a beautiful miniatures which were stolen before [[1860 AD\|1860]]-[[1862 D\|1862]], except one before [[Gospel of John]].<sup>[3]</sup> The dimensions of the text 13.6 by 6.8 cm.<sup>[2]</sup> It was written on parchment continuously and without separation in "elegant and minute" [[Lower case\|minuscule]], furnished with breathings, accents, and ascript. The initial letters are gilt, and on the first page of each Gospel the full point is a large gilt ball.<sup>[3]</sup> The Ammonian sections presented (Mark 236), but the [[Eusebian Canons]] absent. It contains Prolegomena, τιτλοι, [[Synaxarium\|synaxaria]], and pictures. [[Book of Acts\|Acts]] and epistles have the [[Euthalius\|Euthalian]] apparatus.<sup>[1]</sup>		The codex contains the entire [[New Testament]] except of [[Book of Revelation]] in the order: [[Gospel]]s, [[Acts of the Apostles]], [[General epistles]], and [[Pauline epistles]] ([[Epistle to the Hebrews\|Hebrews]] is the last book in Paul). Written in one column per page, 38 lines per page, on 297 parchment leaves (18.5 by 11.5 cm),<sup>[1]</sup> with a beautiful miniatures which were stolen before [[1860 AD\|1860]]-[[1862 D\|1862]], except one before [[Gospel of John]].<sup>[3]</sup> The dimensions of the text 13.6 by 6.8 cm.<sup>[2]</sup> It was written on parchment continuously and without separation in "elegant and minute" [[Lower case\|minuscule]], furnished with breathings, accents, and ascript. The initial letters are gilt, and on the first page of each Gospel the full point is a large gilt ball.<sup>[3]</sup> The Ammonian sections presented (Mark 236), but the [[Eusebian Canons]] absent. It contains Prolegomena, τιτλοι, [[Synaxarium\|synaxaria]], and pictures. [[Book of Acts\|Acts]] and epistles have the [[Euthalius\|Euthalian]] apparatus.<sup>[4]</sup>

	It contains a scholion questioning the authenticity of [[Mark 16\|Mark 16:9-20]]. The [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery\|Pericope Adultera]] is placed after [[John 21:25]].<sup>[1]</sup>		It contains a scholion questioning the authenticity of [[Mark 16\|Mark 16:9-20]]. The [[Jesus and the woman taken in adultery\|Pericope Adultera]] is placed after [[John 21:25]].<sup>[1]</sup>

Nick: /* Text of the codex */

2009-12-14T09:39:44Z

Text of the codex

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 14 December 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].		The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].

	[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[1]</sup>]]		[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>]]
	According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].		According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:27, 25 March 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].		[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

	[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:		[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from [[Minuscule 1\|minuscule 1]]:
	: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];		: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
	: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];		: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 29 December 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].		[[Johann Albrecht Bengel\|Bengel]] made a few extracts from the codex. [[Johann Jakob Wettstein\| Wettstein]] was the first who thoroughly examined this codex. According to him in the Gospels its text agrees with the most ancient codices and [[List of New Testament Church Fathers\|patristic quotations]].<sup>[10]</sup> In 1751 he changed his high opinion (Novum Testamentum Græcum). Wettstein dated codex to the 10th century. Wettstein collated this manuscript twice, but with many errors. According to Tregelles his collation was incorrect in more than 1200 readings. Hug supported last opinion of Wettstein that codex was latinizated.<sup>[11]</sup> [[Samuel Prideaux Tregelles\|Tregelles]], and Roth collated this manuscript again. Tregelles noticed that this codex is similar to minuscule 118. [[John William Burgon\|Dean Burgon]] noticed that also codices 131 and 209 are similar. All this group was examined by [[Kirsopp Lake]] in 1902.<sup>[12]</sup> It was named "the Lake Group", or [[Family 1]].

	[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) ~~shawed~~, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:		[[Frederick Henry Ambrose Scrivener\|F. H. A. Scrivener]] (1813-1891) showed, that at least 22 verses of Erasmian text came from minuscule 1:
	: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];		: [[Mathew 22:28]]; [[Mathew 23:25\|23:25]]; [[Mathew 27:52\|27:52]]; [[Mathew 28:3\|28:3]]-[[Mathew 28:4\|4]]; [[Mathew 19:20\|19:20]];
	: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];		: [[Mark 7:18]]; [[Mark 19:26\|19:26]]; [[Mark 10:1\|10:1]]; [[Mark 12:22\|12:22]]; [[Mark 15:46\|15:46]];

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 14 December 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].		The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].

	[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>]]		[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>
	According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].		According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 14 December 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].		The Greek text of the [[Gospels]] is a representative of the [[Caesarean text-type]]. [[Kurt Aland\|Aland]] placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category III\|Category III]]. In rest of the books of the New Testament the text of this codex is a representative of the [[Byzantine text-type]]. Aland placed it in [[Categories of New Testament manuscripts#Category V\|Category V]].<sup>[4]</sup> It belongs to the [[Family 1]] together with manuscripts [[Minuscule 118\|118]], [[Minuscule 131\|131]], and [[Minuscule 209\|209]].

	[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[1]</sup>]]		[[Johann Jakob Griesbach\|Griesbach]] was the first who remarked its similarities to the text of [[Origen]]'s commentary to Matthew.<sup>[7]</sup>]]
	According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].		According to [[Fenton John Anthony Hort\|Hort]] its text preceded the [[byzantine text-type]].