Matthew 1:18 - Revision history

Nick at 09:15, 13 May 2025

2025-05-13T09:15:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 13 May 2025
Line 272:		Line 272:
	* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Voici de quelle manière arriva la naissance de Jésus -Christ. Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte, par la vertu du Saint -Esprit, avant qu’ils eussent habité ensemble. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>		* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Voici de quelle manière arriva la naissance de Jésus -Christ. Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte, par la vertu du Saint -Esprit, avant qu’ils eussent habité ensemble. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])
			* [[2022 AD\|2022]] Or la naissance de Jésus Christ arriva de cette manière : Comme sa mère, Marie, était fiancée à Joseph, avant qu’ils aient été ensemble, elle se trouva enceinte de l’Esprit Saint. ([[King James Française]])

	====[[German]]====		====[[German]]====

Nick at 10:12, 14 September 2024

2024-09-14T10:12:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 14 September 2024
Line 270:		Line 270:
	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Or, la naissance de Jésus-Christ arriva ainsi: Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte par la vertu du Saint-Esprit, avant qu'ils eussent été ensemble. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Or, la naissance de Jésus-Christ arriva ainsi: Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte par la vertu du Saint-Esprit, avant qu'ils eussent été ensemble. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>
	* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)		* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)
	* [[1910 AD\|1910]]		* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Voici de quelle manière arriva la naissance de Jésus -Christ. Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte, par la vertu du Saint -Esprit, avant qu’ils eussent habité ensemble. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])

Nick: /* Quum in Beza */

2020-09-12T10:57:02Z

Quum in Beza

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:57, 12 September 2020
Line 56:		Line 56:
	In medieval writing the word ''Christ'' was often abbreviated using the [[Greek alphabet\|Greek]] letters [[Chi (letter)\|Chi]] (X) and [[Rho (letter)\|Rho]] (P). The word ''Christi'' (of Christ) was then written XPi. The verses [[Matthew 1:1]] through [[Matthew 1:17]] give the genealogy of Joseph, with the actual narrative of Christ's birth starting at Matthew 1:18. Insular scribes treated Matthew 1:1-17 as an almost separate work from the rest of Matthew. Insular scribes also started a tradition of giving the opening few words of each of the Gospels an elaborate decorative treatment. Accordingly, the Insular scribes gave the opening Chi Rho monogram an increasingly elaborate decoration. This trend culminated in the [[Book of Kells]] (''pictured''), where the monogram has taken over the entire page. Although later scribes (such as those of the [[Carolingian Renaissance]]) followed the Insular tradition of giving elaborate decorative treatments to the opening words of texts, including the Gospels, they did not follow the tradition of decoration this verse. The presence of a decorated Chi Rho monogram within a manuscript can then be seen as indicative of Insular influence.		In medieval writing the word ''Christ'' was often abbreviated using the [[Greek alphabet\|Greek]] letters [[Chi (letter)\|Chi]] (X) and [[Rho (letter)\|Rho]] (P). The word ''Christi'' (of Christ) was then written XPi. The verses [[Matthew 1:1]] through [[Matthew 1:17]] give the genealogy of Joseph, with the actual narrative of Christ's birth starting at Matthew 1:18. Insular scribes treated Matthew 1:1-17 as an almost separate work from the rest of Matthew. Insular scribes also started a tradition of giving the opening few words of each of the Gospels an elaborate decorative treatment. Accordingly, the Insular scribes gave the opening Chi Rho monogram an increasingly elaborate decoration. This trend culminated in the [[Book of Kells]] (''pictured''), where the monogram has taken over the entire page. Although later scribes (such as those of the [[Carolingian Renaissance]]) followed the Insular tradition of giving elaborate decorative treatments to the opening words of texts, including the Gospels, they did not follow the tradition of decoration this verse. The presence of a decorated Chi Rho monogram within a manuscript can then be seen as indicative of Insular influence.

	====Quum in ~~Beza~~====		====Quum in Beza’s Latin====
	cum as a conjunction (i.e. ‘when’, ‘because’ etc) is quom in old Latin. Two regular changes lead it to become cum: -om to -um, and quu to cu. Quum is what it looks like with just the first of those changes. It’s quite common in pre-20th century printings because it lets you distinguish between cum ‘with’ and quum ‘when, since’.		cum as a conjunction (i.e. ‘when’, ‘because’ etc) is quom in old Latin. Two regular changes lead it to become cum: -om to -um, and quu to cu. Quum is what it looks like with just the first of those changes. It’s quite common in pre-20th century printings because it lets you distinguish between cum ‘with’ and quum ‘when, since’.

Nick: /* Commentary */

2020-09-12T10:55:51Z

Commentary

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 12 September 2020
Line 55:		Line 55:

	In medieval writing the word ''Christ'' was often abbreviated using the [[Greek alphabet\|Greek]] letters [[Chi (letter)\|Chi]] (X) and [[Rho (letter)\|Rho]] (P). The word ''Christi'' (of Christ) was then written XPi. The verses [[Matthew 1:1]] through [[Matthew 1:17]] give the genealogy of Joseph, with the actual narrative of Christ's birth starting at Matthew 1:18. Insular scribes treated Matthew 1:1-17 as an almost separate work from the rest of Matthew. Insular scribes also started a tradition of giving the opening few words of each of the Gospels an elaborate decorative treatment. Accordingly, the Insular scribes gave the opening Chi Rho monogram an increasingly elaborate decoration. This trend culminated in the [[Book of Kells]] (''pictured''), where the monogram has taken over the entire page. Although later scribes (such as those of the [[Carolingian Renaissance]]) followed the Insular tradition of giving elaborate decorative treatments to the opening words of texts, including the Gospels, they did not follow the tradition of decoration this verse. The presence of a decorated Chi Rho monogram within a manuscript can then be seen as indicative of Insular influence.		In medieval writing the word ''Christ'' was often abbreviated using the [[Greek alphabet\|Greek]] letters [[Chi (letter)\|Chi]] (X) and [[Rho (letter)\|Rho]] (P). The word ''Christi'' (of Christ) was then written XPi. The verses [[Matthew 1:1]] through [[Matthew 1:17]] give the genealogy of Joseph, with the actual narrative of Christ's birth starting at Matthew 1:18. Insular scribes treated Matthew 1:1-17 as an almost separate work from the rest of Matthew. Insular scribes also started a tradition of giving the opening few words of each of the Gospels an elaborate decorative treatment. Accordingly, the Insular scribes gave the opening Chi Rho monogram an increasingly elaborate decoration. This trend culminated in the [[Book of Kells]] (''pictured''), where the monogram has taken over the entire page. Although later scribes (such as those of the [[Carolingian Renaissance]]) followed the Insular tradition of giving elaborate decorative treatments to the opening words of texts, including the Gospels, they did not follow the tradition of decoration this verse. The presence of a decorated Chi Rho monogram within a manuscript can then be seen as indicative of Insular influence.

			====Quum in Beza====
			cum as a conjunction (i.e. ‘when’, ‘because’ etc) is quom in old Latin. Two regular changes lead it to become cum: -om to -um, and quu to cu. Quum is what it looks like with just the first of those changes. It’s quite common in pre-20th century printings because it lets you distinguish between cum ‘with’ and quum ‘when, since’.

	==Greek==		==Greek==

Beza 1598: /* Romainian */

2018-10-01T11:07:18Z

Romainian

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 1 October 2018
Line 342:		Line 342:
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>
	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi naşterea lui Isus Cristos ~~a fost~~ astfel: Pe când Maria, ~~mama lui~~, era logodită cu Iosif, ~~înainte ca~~ să fie ei împreună, ea s-a ~~aflat însărcinată~~ din Duhul Sfânt. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>		* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi naşterea lui Isus Cristos afost astfel: Pe când Maria, mamalui, era logodită cu Iosif, înainteca să fie ei împreună, ea s-a aflatînsărcinată din Duhul Sfânt. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>

	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

Beza 1598: /* Romainian */

2018-10-01T09:36:15Z

Romainian

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 1 October 2018
Line 342:		Line 342:
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>
			* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi naşterea lui Isus Cristos a fost astfel: Pe când Maria, mama lui, era logodită cu Iosif, înainte ca să fie ei împreună, ea s-a aflat însărcinată din Duhul Sfânt. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>

	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

Nick: /* γέννησις or γένησις */

2018-09-18T04:10:07Z

γέννησις or γένησις

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 18 September 2018
Line 20:		Line 20:
	===The birth γέννησις===		===The birth γέννησις===
	====[[1083\|γέννησις]] or [[1083\|γένησις]]====		====[[1083\|γέννησις]] or [[1083\|γένησις]]====
	There is a minor variant which does not directly affect English translations, but causes issues in Greek, creating translational issues ~~elsewhere~~. [[1083\|γέννησις]] (''gennesis'') from Beza's TR means “birth” in the [[KJV]], and genesis from the Westcott and Hort type texts also means “birth” in modern versions. Beza's ''gennesis'' is to be preferred as the better reading agreeing with the Majority Byzantine, Lectionaries 2378 & 1968; Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and various ancient church writers e.g., Irenaeus, Origen, and Chrysostom, while the critical text’s reading (with support from the Alexandrian Text and e.g., Armenian Version), has the danger that genesis (nominative singular feminine, from genesis-eos, can also mean “creation,” so that an Arian heretic could misuse the critical text’s altered reading in a way he could not misuse the Beza's reading of gennesis (nominative singular feminine, from gennesis-eos, e). An Arian (Such as a Jehovah's Witness) could claim Christ’s “genesis” or origins or existence ([[James 3:6]]) date from his conception in Mary’s womb. The context of Matthew 1:18 has led those using the critical text’s genesis here to translate it as “birth” ([[ASV]]), as an [[ASV]] footnote correctly says at “birth,” “Or, ‘generation,’” though then qualifies this as being synonymous with the “generation” of [[Matthew 1:1]]. Nevertheless, the danger still exists, that a future version could say that it shows that Christ’s ‘genesis’ or origins were at his conception in Mary.” The critical text open the door to anti Trinitarianism. It must be noted that while having similar roots, [[Matthew 1:1]] is 'genesis' translated as generation (also translated as nature) never as birth, nor as genealogy, which is a separate and distinct word used in the Pastorals.		There is a minor variant which does not directly affect English translations in verse 18 but does in verse 1. It causes issues in Greek, creating definitional and translational issues. [[1083\|γέννησις]] (''gennesis'') from Beza's TR means “birth” in the [[KJV]], and genesis from the Westcott and Hort type texts also means “birth” in modern versions. Beza's ''gennesis'' is to be preferred as the better reading agreeing with the Majority Byzantine, Lectionaries 2378 & 1968; Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and various ancient church writers e.g., Irenaeus, Origen, and Chrysostom, while the critical text’s reading (with support from the Alexandrian Text and e.g., Armenian Version), has the danger that genesis (nominative singular feminine, from genesis-eos, can also mean “creation,” so that an Arian heretic could misuse the critical text’s altered reading in a way he could not misuse the Beza's reading of gennesis (nominative singular feminine, from gennesis-eos, e). An Arian (Such as a Jehovah's Witness) could claim Christ’s “genesis” or origins or existence ([[James 3:6]]) date from his conception in Mary’s womb. The context of Matthew 1:18 has led those using the critical text’s genesis here to translate it as “birth” ([[ASV]]), as an [[ASV]] footnote correctly says at “birth,” “Or, ‘generation,’” though then qualifies this as being synonymous with the “generation” of [[Matthew 1:1]]. Nevertheless, the danger still exists, that a future version could say that it shows that Christ’s ‘genesis’ or origins were at his conception in Mary.” The critical text open the door to anti Trinitarianism. It must be noted that while having similar roots, [[Matthew 1:1]] is 'genesis' translated as generation (also translated as nature) never as birth, nor as genealogy, which is a separate and distinct word used in the Pastorals.

	In in [[Matthew 1:16]] the concept of a birth (εγεννήθη), coupled with also the angel’s reference to Jesus’ conception (γεννήθη) in 1:18, and the birth (γεννηθέντος) of Jesus in [[Matthew 2:1\|2:1]], is internal evidence for γέννησις. In the Nestle-Aland27/UBS4 apparatus, it states that Irenaeus (writing in southern France, [[180 AD\|180]]) and Origen (writing in Caesarea, from about [[230 AD\|230]]-[[250 AD\|250]]) support Beza's γεννησις.		In in [[Matthew 1:16]] the concept of a birth (εγεννήθη), coupled with also the angel’s reference to Jesus’ conception (γεννήθη) in 1:18, and the birth (γεννηθέντος) of Jesus in [[Matthew 2:1\|2:1]], is internal evidence for γέννησις. In the Nestle-Aland27/UBS4 apparatus, it states that Irenaeus (writing in southern France, [[180 AD\|180]]) and Origen (writing in Caesarea, from about [[230 AD\|230]]-[[250 AD\|250]]) support Beza's γεννησις.

Nick: /* Commentary */

2018-09-18T04:07:10Z

Commentary

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, 18 September 2018
Line 19:		Line 19:
	==Commentary==		==Commentary==
	===The birth γέννησις===		===The birth γέννησις===
	=====[[1083\|γέννησις]] or [[1083\|γένησις]]=====		====[[1083\|γέννησις]] or [[1083\|γένησις]]====
	There is a minor variant which does not directly affect English translations, but causes issues in Greek, creating translational issues elsewhere. [[1083\|γέννησις]] (''gennesis'') from Beza's TR means “birth” in the [[KJV]], and genesis from the Westcott and Hort type texts also means “birth” in modern versions. Beza's ''gennesis'' is to be preferred as the better reading agreeing with the Majority Byzantine, Lectionaries 2378 & 1968; Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and various ancient church writers e.g., Irenaeus, Origen, and Chrysostom, while the critical text’s reading (with support from the Alexandrian Text and e.g., Armenian Version), has the danger that genesis (nominative singular feminine, from genesis-eos, can also mean “creation,” so that an Arian heretic could misuse the critical text’s altered reading in a way he could not misuse the Beza's reading of gennesis (nominative singular feminine, from gennesis-eos, e). An Arian (Such as a Jehovah's Witness) could claim Christ’s “genesis” or origins or existence ([[James 3:6]]) date from his conception in Mary’s womb. The context of Matthew 1:18 has led those using the critical text’s genesis here to translate it as “birth” ([[ASV]]), as an [[ASV]] footnote correctly says at “birth,” “Or, ‘generation,’” though then qualifies this as being synonymous with the “generation” of [[Matthew 1:1]]. Nevertheless, the danger still exists, that a future version could say that it shows that Christ’s ‘genesis’ or origins were at his conception in Mary.” The critical text open the door to anti Trinitarianism. It must be noted that while having similar roots, [[Matthew 1:1]] is 'genesis' translated as generation (also translated as nature) never as birth, nor as genealogy, which is a separate and distinct word used in the Pastorals.		There is a minor variant which does not directly affect English translations, but causes issues in Greek, creating translational issues elsewhere. [[1083\|γέννησις]] (''gennesis'') from Beza's TR means “birth” in the [[KJV]], and genesis from the Westcott and Hort type texts also means “birth” in modern versions. Beza's ''gennesis'' is to be preferred as the better reading agreeing with the Majority Byzantine, Lectionaries 2378 & 1968; Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and various ancient church writers e.g., Irenaeus, Origen, and Chrysostom, while the critical text’s reading (with support from the Alexandrian Text and e.g., Armenian Version), has the danger that genesis (nominative singular feminine, from genesis-eos, can also mean “creation,” so that an Arian heretic could misuse the critical text’s altered reading in a way he could not misuse the Beza's reading of gennesis (nominative singular feminine, from gennesis-eos, e). An Arian (Such as a Jehovah's Witness) could claim Christ’s “genesis” or origins or existence ([[James 3:6]]) date from his conception in Mary’s womb. The context of Matthew 1:18 has led those using the critical text’s genesis here to translate it as “birth” ([[ASV]]), as an [[ASV]] footnote correctly says at “birth,” “Or, ‘generation,’” though then qualifies this as being synonymous with the “generation” of [[Matthew 1:1]]. Nevertheless, the danger still exists, that a future version could say that it shows that Christ’s ‘genesis’ or origins were at his conception in Mary.” The critical text open the door to anti Trinitarianism. It must be noted that while having similar roots, [[Matthew 1:1]] is 'genesis' translated as generation (also translated as nature) never as birth, nor as genealogy, which is a separate and distinct word used in the Pastorals.

Nick at 10:14, 16 September 2018

2018-09-16T10:14:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 16 September 2018
Line 421:		Line 421:

	{{Donate}}		{{Donate}}
			[[Category:Nativity of Jesus in the New Testament]]

Nick at 20:28, 4 July 2018

2018-07-04T20:28:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 4 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Verses in Matthew 1}}		{{Template:Verses in Matthew 1}}

			<center><< - [[Matthew 1:17]] - [[Matthew 1:19]] - >></center>

	* '''[[Matthew 1:18 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΝ 1:18]]''' [[3588\|Τοῦ]] [[1161\|δὲ]] [[2424\|Ἰησοῦ]] [[5547\|Χριστοῦ]] [[3588\|ἡ]] [[1083\|γέννησις]] [[3779\|οὕτως]] [[2258\|ἠν]]. [[3423\|μνηστευθείσης]] [[1063\|γὰρ]] [[3588\|τῆς]] [[3384\|μητρὸς]] [[846\|αὐτοῦ]] [[3137\|Μαρίας]] [[3588\|τῷ]] [[2501\|Ἰωσήφ]], [[4250\|πρὶν]] [[2228\|ἢ]] [[4905\|συνελθεῖν]] [[846\|αὐτούς]], [[2147\|εὑρέθη]] [[1722\|ἐν]] [[1064\|γαστρὶ]] [[2192\|ἔχουσα]] [[1537\|ἐκ]] [[4151\|Πνεύματος]] [[40\|ἁγίου]].		* '''[[Matthew 1:18 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΝ 1:18]]''' [[3588\|Τοῦ]] [[1161\|δὲ]] [[2424\|Ἰησοῦ]] [[5547\|Χριστοῦ]] [[3588\|ἡ]] [[1083\|γέννησις]] [[3779\|οὕτως]] [[2258\|ἠν]]. [[3423\|μνηστευθείσης]] [[1063\|γὰρ]] [[3588\|τῆς]] [[3384\|μητρὸς]] [[846\|αὐτοῦ]] [[3137\|Μαρίας]] [[3588\|τῷ]] [[2501\|Ἰωσήφ]], [[4250\|πρὶν]] [[2228\|ἢ]] [[4905\|συνελθεῖν]] [[846\|αὐτούς]], [[2147\|εὑρέθη]] [[1722\|ἐν]] [[1064\|γαστρὶ]] [[2192\|ἔχουσα]] [[1537\|ἐκ]] [[4151\|Πνεύματος]] [[40\|ἁγίου]].

Line 411:		Line 414:
	* [http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2016/07/matthew-118-two-doctrinally-significant.html Matthew 1:18 - Two Doctrinally Significant Variants in One Verse] by [[James Snapp Jr]]. Snapp holds to an Equitable Eclectic position.		* [http://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2016/07/matthew-118-two-doctrinally-significant.html Matthew 1:18 - Two Doctrinally Significant Variants in One Verse] by [[James Snapp Jr]]. Snapp holds to an Equitable Eclectic position.
	* [http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/illmanus/other/011add000009381u00014v00.html Matthew 1:18 in the Bodmin Gospels] British Library.		* [http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/illmanus/other/011add000009381u00014v00.html Matthew 1:18 in the Bodmin Gospels] British Library.

			<center><< - [[Matthew 1:17]] - [[Matthew 1:19]] - >></center>

	==Commentaries==		==Commentaries==
	{{Commentaries}}		{{Commentaries}}

	{{Donate}}		{{Donate}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 14 September 2024
Line 270:		Line 270:
	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Or, la naissance de Jésus-Christ arriva ainsi: Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte par la vertu du Saint-Esprit, avant qu'ils eussent été ensemble. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Or, la naissance de Jésus-Christ arriva ainsi: Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte par la vertu du Saint-Esprit, avant qu'ils eussent été ensemble. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>
	* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)		* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)
	* [[1910 AD\|1910]]		* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Voici de quelle manière arriva la naissance de Jésus -Christ. Marie, sa mère, ayant été fiancée à Joseph, se trouva enceinte, par la vertu du Saint -Esprit, avant qu’ils eussent habité ensemble. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])