King James Onlyism - Revision history

Beza 1598 at 05:52, 11 March 2016

2016-03-11T05:52:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:52, 11 March 2016
Line 18:		Line 18:
	===Critical===		===Critical===
	* [http://www.equip.org/articles/is-your-modern-translation-corrupt- Is your modern translation corrupt] by [[James White]]		* [http://www.equip.org/articles/is-your-modern-translation-corrupt- Is your modern translation corrupt] by [[James White]]

			{{Donate}}

Nick: /* King James Only Websites */

2009-06-10T08:56:12Z

King James Only Websites

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:56, 10 June 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* [http://trinitarianbiblesociety.org The Trinitarian Bible Society]		* [http://trinitarianbiblesociety.org The Trinitarian Bible Society]
	* [http://biblebelievers.net Bible Believers]		* [http://biblebelievers.net Bible Believers]

			===Critical===
			* [http://www.equip.org/articles/is-your-modern-translation-corrupt- Is your modern translation corrupt] by [[James White]]

Nick at 13:07, 7 June 2009

2009-06-07T13:07:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 7 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized [[King James Version]] ([KJV]]) of the Christian Bible, and often to the [[Textus Receptus]] Greek of the [[New Testament]] and the [[Masoretic Text]] of the [[Old Testament]], from which the [[KJV]] was translated.		The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized [[King James Version]] ([[KJV]]) of the Christian Bible, and often to the [[Textus Receptus]] Greek of the [[New Testament]] and the [[Masoretic Text]] of the [[Old Testament]], from which the [[KJV]] was translated.

	The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite]] states the term is a "smear word".		The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite]] states the term is a "smear word".

Nick at 13:07, 7 June 2009

2009-06-07T13:07:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 7 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized King James Version (KJV) of the Christian Bible, and often to the Textus Receptus ~~version~~ of the New Testament and the Masoretic Text of the Old Testament, from which the KJV was translated.		The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized [[King James Version]] ([KJV]]) of the Christian Bible, and often to the [[Textus Receptus]] Greek of the [[New Testament]] and the [[Masoretic Text]] of the [[Old Testament]], from which the [[KJV]] was translated.

	The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite]] states the term is a "smear word".		The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite]] states the term is a "smear word".

Nick at 08:04, 23 May 2009

2009-05-23T08:04:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 23 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==External Links==		==External Links==
	* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]		* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]
			* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King-James-Only_Movement Wikipedia Article about King James Onlyism]

	===King James Only Websites===		===King James Only Websites===

Nick at 09:24, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T09:24:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, 22 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	==External Links==		==External Links==
	* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]		* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]

			===King James Only Websites===

			* [http://www.biblefortoday.org The Bible For Today]
			* [http://www.wayoflife.org Way of Life Literature]
			* [http://avpublications.com AV Publications]
			* [http://deanburgonsociety.org The Dean Burgon Society]
			* [http://trinitarianbiblesociety.org The Trinitarian Bible Society]
			* [http://biblebelievers.net Bible Believers]

Nick at 08:46, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T08:46:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 22 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized King James Version (KJV) of the Christian Bible, and often to the Textus Receptus version of the New Testament and the Masoretic Text of the Old Testament, from which the KJV was translated.		The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized King James Version (KJV) of the Christian Bible, and often to the Textus Receptus version of the New Testament and the Masoretic Text of the Old Testament, from which the KJV was translated.

	The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite ~~states~~]] the term is a "smear word".		The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite]] states the term is a "smear word".

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]		* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]

Nick at 08:46, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T08:46:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:46, 22 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	King James Onlyism		The King James Only movement is a label applied to a wide variety of beliefs concerning the superiority of the Authorized King James Version (KJV) of the Christian Bible, and often to the Textus Receptus version of the New Testament and the Masoretic Text of the Old Testament, from which the KJV was translated.

			The origin of the label "King James Only" is unclear, though as early as 1987, it was being used to refer to claims of exclusivity for the King James Version and the controversy which had been brewing over these claims for almost a decade. American church historian and apologist [[James White\|James R. White]] states that the phrases "KJV Only" and "KJV Onlyism" are not "insulting" or "inaccurate." However, KJV proponent [[D. A. Waite states]] the term is a "smear word".

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]		* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]

Nick at 08:41, 22 May 2009

2009-05-22T08:41:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:41, 22 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	King James Onlyism		King James Onlyism

			==External Links==
			* [http://soundthetrumpet.ca/media/?id=5579 Article on King James Onlyism] by [[David Cloud]]

Nick: Protected "King James Onlyism" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2009-05-22T08:37:15Z

Protected "King James Onlyism" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:37, 22 May 2009
(No difference)