Kiev Missal - Revision history

Nick at 11:22, 24 September 2017

2017-09-24T11:22:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 24 September 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	The Croatian Slavist [[Josip Hamm]] stirred a fierce debate in his book ''Das Glagolitische Missale von Kiew'' (Wien, 1979). In it, and in his other papers and lectures he maintained the view that the Kiev Folios are a 19th century fake by Czech patriots in order to prove the antiquity of Czech literary culture. However, in general Slavistics do not hold this view.		The Croatian Slavist [[Josip Hamm]] stirred a fierce debate in his book ''Das Glagolitische Missale von Kiew'' (Wien, 1979). In it, and in his other papers and lectures he maintained the view that the Kiev Folios are a 19th century fake by Czech patriots in order to prove the antiquity of Czech literary culture. However, in general Slavistics do not hold this view.

	The first page of the first folio was written later than other pages, probably at the transition from 11th to 12th century. Linguistic, paleographical and graphical analysis point to the South Slavic area. That page contains parts of Paul's epistles (13, 11-14 and 14, 1-4). That part of Kiev Folios and the problems associated with it have been heavily analysed by the Croatian Slavist Marija Pantelić~~<ref>{{harvtxt\|Pantelić\|1985}}</ref>~~, who situates them somewhere in the [[Dubrovnik]] area.		The first page of the first folio was written later than other pages, probably at the transition from 11th to 12th century. Linguistic, paleographical and graphical analysis point to the South Slavic area. That page contains parts of Paul's epistles (13, 11-14 and 14, 1-4). That part of Kiev Folios and the problems associated with it have been heavily analysed by the Croatian Slavist Marija Pantelić, who situates them somewhere in the [[Dubrovnik]] area.

	The Kiev Folios are generally held by Slavistics as the oldest among the OCS canon manuscripts, even though they exhibit several West Slavic features that place them at the beginning of the Czech-Moravian recension of OCS. These are:		The Kiev Folios are generally held by Slavistics as the oldest among the OCS canon manuscripts, even though they exhibit several West Slavic features that place them at the beginning of the Czech-Moravian recension of OCS. These are:

Beza 1598: /* External links */

2016-03-10T08:40:36Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 10 March 2016
Line 40:		Line 40:
	[[Category:Biblical manuscripts\|Kiev Missal]]		[[Category:Biblical manuscripts\|Kiev Missal]]
	[[Category:Old Church Slavonic canon]]		[[Category:Old Church Slavonic canon]]

			{{Donate}}

Nick: /* References */

2010-12-06T09:08:29Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:08, 6 December 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	==References==		==References==
	*
	*		* Damjanović, Stjepan (2004) (in Croatian), Slovo iskona, Zagreb: Matica hrvatska, ISBN 953-150-567-5
	*		* Schenker, Alexander M. (1995), The Dawn of Slavic: An Introduction to Slavic Philology, New Haven: Yale University Press, ISBN 0-30005-846-2
	*		* Pantelić, Marija (September 1985), "On Kiev and Sinai folia" (in Croatian) (PDF), Slovo (Old Church Slavonic Institute) 35: 5–56, http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=22325
	*		* Zagiba, Franz (September 1964), "Die historische Umkreis der Kiever Sakramentarfragmente" (in German) (PDF), Slovo (Old Church Slavonic Institute) 14: 59–77, http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=21195
	*		* Koschmieder, Erwin (September 1955), "Die Vermeintlichen Akzentzechen der Kiever Blatter" (in German) (PDF), Slovo (Old Church Slavonic Institute) 4-5: 5–23, http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=21367
			* Nedeljković, Olga (September 1964), "Akcenti ili neume u Kijevskim listićima" (in Croatian) (PDF), Slovo (Old Church Slavonic Institute) 14: 25–51, http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=21193

	==External links==		==External links==
	* [http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/slav/aksl/kievfol/kievf.htm Kiev Folios], at TITUS project		* [http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/slav/aksl/kievfol/kievf.htm Kiev Folios], at TITUS project

Nick: New page: folio 7r The third folio of Kiev Missal The '''Kiev Missal''' (or '''Kiev Fragments''' or '''Kiev ...

2010-12-06T09:00:44Z

New page: thumb|folio 7r thumb|right|The third folio of Kiev Missal The '''Kiev Missal''' (or '''Kiev Fragments''' or '''Kiev ...

New page

[[Image:Kiev Folios, fol. 7r.jpg|thumb|folio 7r]]
[[Image:Kiev Glagolitic list X.jpg|thumb|right|The third folio of Kiev Missal]]
The '''Kiev Missal''' (or '''Kiev Fragments''' or '''Kiev Folios''') is a 7-folio [[Glagolitic script|Glagolitic]] [[Old Church Slavonic]] [[Old_Church_Slavonic#The_canon_of_Old_Church_Slavonic|canon]] [[manuscript]] containing parts of the Roman-rite liturgy. It is usually held to be the oldest Old Church Slavonic manuscript with coherent text, dated at the latter half of the 10th century. Seven folios have been preserved in small format (cca 14,5x10,5 cm) of easily portable book to be of use to the missionaries on the move.

By content it is a [[Roman Missal]], i.e. a book collecting all the text used at the [[Mass (liturgy)|holy mass]] service. Missal texts are accompanied by instructions on how to perform rites throughout the liturgical year, called ''[[rubric]]s'', which is a term originating from [[Latin language|Latin]] word ''rubrica'' designating red soil used for painting. The text of the Kiev Missal folios has been for the most part written in black (these are the texts meant to be pronounced), and for the lesser part in ''red'' (these are the instructions interpreting gestures that priest must perform and other instructions for the ceremony). Since Kiev Missal has only 13 pages preserved, it's obvious that only a part of the missal has been preserved, from the [[Sacramentary]] containing crucial and unchangeable parts spoken by the priest.

Kiev Folios have been found in the 19th century in Jerusalem by the Archimandrite Andrej Kapustin ([[Antonin Kapustin]]) and were donated by him to the [[Kiev Theological Academy]]. After the revolution the folios were transferred to the [[Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine|library of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences]] in [[Kiev]] where they are kept today.

The Kiev missal was published by the renowned Slavist [[Ismail Ivanovich Sreznjevski]], who edited the first edition of the Kiev Folios in 1874. It has been published many times, not always successfully. Notable editions are by [[Vatroslav Jagić]] in 1890 (''Glagolitica. 2. Würdigung neuendtdeckter Fragmente, Mit 10 Taf.'', Wien 1890, Denkschrift. Kaiserl. Akad., Bd. 38), by Sievers in 1924 (''Die altslavischen Verstexte von Kiew und Freising'', Leipzig 1924, Akad. Wiss., phil.-hist. Kl., Bd. 76/2) and by Mohlberg in 1928 (''Il messale di Kiew/sec IX./ed il suo prototipo Romano del VI-VII''). Special attention to the Kiev folios has been paid by [[Václav Vondrák]] in a paper ''O pùvodu Kijevskych listù a Pražskych zlomkù a o bohemismech v staršich cirkevnìslovanskych pamatkach vùbec'' (Praha, 1904). The newest facsimile edition has been published in 1983 in Kiev to honour the ninth [[International Congress of Slavists]] which was held in Kiev (V. V. Nimčuk, ''Kijvlьski glagolični listki'', AN USSR). That edition contains extensive overview of the oldest Old Church Slavonic canon manuscript.

The Croatian Slavist [[Josip Hamm]] stirred a fierce debate in his book ''Das Glagolitische Missale von Kiew'' (Wien, 1979). In it, and in his other papers and lectures he maintained the view that the Kiev Folios are a 19th century fake by Czech patriots in order to prove the antiquity of Czech literary culture. However, in general Slavistics do not hold this view.

The first page of the first folio was written later than other pages, probably at the transition from 11th to 12th century. Linguistic, paleographical and graphical analysis point to the South Slavic area. That page contains parts of Paul's epistles (13, 11-14 and 14, 1-4). That part of Kiev Folios and the problems associated with it have been heavily analysed by the Croatian Slavist Marija Pantelić<ref>{{harvtxt|Pantelić|1985}}</ref>, who situates them somewhere in the [[Dubrovnik]] area.

The Kiev Folios are generally held by Slavistics as the oldest among the OCS canon manuscripts, even though they exhibit several West Slavic features that place them at the beginning of the Czech-Moravian recension of OCS. These are:
* Instead of OCS ''št'', ''žd'' we find West Slavic reflexes of [[Proto-Slavic]] */tj/ (*ktj) and */dj/, i.e. instead of ''pomoštь'' we find ''pomocь'', instead of ''prosęšte'' we find ''prosęce'', instead of ''daždь'' we find ''dazь'', instead of ''tuždimь'' we find ''tuzimь'' etc.
* At the place of Proto-Slavic *stj and *skj we would expect a reflex of OCS ''št'', but we find ''šč'': ''očiščeniě'', ''zaščiti'' (imperative), ''zaščititь''.
* As an ending of instrumental singular of masculine o-stems we would expect ''-omь''. But instead, ''-ъomь'' is used, so instead of expected ''oplatomь'', ''obrazomь'', ''vъsǫdomь'' we find ''oplatъmь'', ''obrazъmь'', ''vъsǫdъmь''.
* Genitive of first-person pronoun ''azъ'' is ''mene'' in OCS. In Kiev Folios we find ''mne'' by the elision of [[Havlík's law|weak yer]].

As features that connect Kiev Folios to the canonic manuscripts of other Slavic areas (namely Bulgaro-Macedonian), one has to note:
* consistent distinguishing between yers ''ъ'' and ''ь'', and only twice ''ъ'' is found where ''ь'' is expected
* Kiev folios preserve nasal vowels (/ę/ and /ǫ/) and don't mix them

==Notes==

==References==
*
*
*
*
*
*
==External links==
* [http://titus.uni-frankfurt.de/texte/etcs/slav/aksl/kievfol/kievf.htm Kiev Folios], at TITUS project
* [http://manuscripts.ru/mns/portal.main?p1=41&p_lid=2&p_sid=1 Kiev Folios], at MANUSCRIPT project
[[Category:10th-century biblical manuscripts]]
[[Category:Biblical manuscripts|Kiev Missal]]
[[Category:Old Church Slavonic canon]]