Hebrews 7:11 - Revision history

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

2018-06-07T17:49:18Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:49, 7 June 2018
Line 285:		Line 285:

	==External Links==		==External Links==

			{{Donate}}

Beza 1598 at 02:56, 25 March 2017

2017-03-25T02:56:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 25 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* '''[[Hebrews 7:11 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΕΒΡΑΙΟΥΣ 7:11]]''' Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ' αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι		* '''[[Hebrews 7:11 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΕΒΡΑΙΟΥΣ 7:11]]''' Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ' αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι

	~~<small>''([[~~Textus Receptus (1598~~)\|Textus Receptus]], [[Theodore Beza]], [[1598 AD\|1598]])''</small>~~		{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}

	* ''' Hebrews 7:11 ''' If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?		* ''' Hebrews 7:11 ''' If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

	~~<small>''([[~~King James Version~~]], [[~~Pure Cambridge Edition~~]] [[1900 AD\|1900]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	* '''[[ Hebrews 7:11 ~~(TRV)~~\|Hebrews 7:11]]''' Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (because under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?		* '''[[Hebrews 7:11 King James Version 2016\|Hebrews 7:11]]''' Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood (because under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?

	~~<small>''([[Textus Receptus~~ Version~~]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598: /* Theodore Beza */

2016-11-27T14:57:34Z

Theodore Beza

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 27 November 2016
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:1 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Hebrews 7:11 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

Beza 1598: /* English Translations */

2015-05-09T06:48:11Z

English Translations

Beza 1598: /* English Translations */

2014-06-29T12:40:23Z

English Translations

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 29 June 2014
Line 80:		Line 80:

	==English Translations==		==English Translations==
	~~[[Image:Matthew 1.1 KJV.JPG\|300px\|thumb\|right\|[[Matthew 1:1]] in the [[1611 AD\|1611]] [[King James Version]]]]~~

	* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
Line 152:		Line 151:
	* [[1898 AD\|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])		* [[1898 AD\|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])

	* [[1901 AD\|1901]] ~~The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.~~ ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])		* [[1901 AD\|1901]] ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] ~~The Lineage Roll of Jesus Christ,––Son of David, Son of Abraham.~~ (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)

Beza 1598 at 14:03, 2 January 2013

2013-01-02T14:03:56Z

Show changes

Nick: Protected "Hebrews 7:11" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2009-12-06T16:10:43Z

Protected "Hebrews 7:11" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:10, 6 December 2009
(No difference)

Nick: New page: '''Hebrews 7:11''' If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after t...

2009-12-06T16:10:38Z

New page: '''Hebrews 7:11''' If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after t...

New page

'''Hebrews 7:11''' If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 27 November 2016
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:1 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Hebrews 7:11 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:40, 29 June 2014
Line 80:		Line 80:

	==English Translations==		==English Translations==
	~~[[Image:Matthew 1.1 KJV.JPG\|300px\|thumb\|right\|[[Matthew 1:1]] in the [[1611 AD\|1611]] [[King James Version]]]]~~

	* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])
Line 152:		Line 151:
	* [[1898 AD\|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])		* [[1898 AD\|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])

	* [[1901 AD\|1901]] ~~The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.~~ ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])		* [[1901 AD\|1901]] ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] ~~The Lineage Roll of Jesus Christ,––Son of David, Son of Abraham.~~ (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 9 May 2015
Line 83:		Line 83:
	* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1380 AD\|1380]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1395 AD\|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1395 AD\|1395]] Therfor if perfeccioun was bi the preesthood of Leuy, for vndur hym the puple took the lawe, what yit was it nedeful, another preest to rise, bi the ordre of Melchisedech, and not to be seid bi the ordre of Aaron? ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1534 AD\|1534]] ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])		* [[1534 AD\|1534]] Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of Melchisedech and not after the order of Aaron? ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])

	* [[1535 AD\|1535]] (Coverdale Bible)		* [[1535 AD\|1535]] Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthode of the Leuites (for vnder the same (presthode) the people receaued the lawe) what neded it then furthurmore, that another prest shulde ryse after the order of Melchisedech, and not after the order of Aaron? (Coverdale Bible)

	* [[1539 AD\|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1539 AD\|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])

	* [[1540 AD\|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1540 AD\|1540]] If now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of þe Leuytes (for vnder that presthod the people receaued the lawe) what neded it furthermore, that another prest shuld ryse to be called after the order of Melchisedech, and not after the order of Aaron? ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])

	* [[1549 AD\|1549]] ([[Matthew's Bible]] - [[John Rogers]])		* [[1549 AD\|1549]] Yf nowe therfore perfeccyon came by the priesthode of the Leuytes (for vnder that presthode the people receyueth the lawe) what nedeth furthermore that another prieste shoulde aryse after the ordre of Melchisedech, and not after the ordre of Aaron? ([[Matthew's Bible]] - [[John Rogers]])

	* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])		* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])
Line 99:		Line 99:
	* [[1560 AD\|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition		* [[1560 AD\|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition

	* [[1568 AD\|1568]] ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition		* [[1568 AD\|1568]] If therefore perfection was by the priesthood of ye Leuites (For vnder that priesthood the people receaued the law) what neded it furthermore that another priest shoulde rise after the order of Melchisedech, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition

	* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])		* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])

	* [[1587 AD\|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1587 AD\|1587]] If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1599 AD\|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1599 AD\|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1611 AD\|1611]] ([[King James Version]])		* [[1611 AD\|1611]] If therefore perfection were by the Leuiticall Priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the Law) what further neede was there, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of Aaron? ([[King James Version]])

	* [[1729 AD\|1729]] ([[Mace New Testament]])		* [[1729 AD\|1729]] If therefore the Levitical priesthood, concerning which the people received a law, could have given perfection, what further need was there that another priest should rise, to be named after the order of Melchisedec, and not after the order of Aaron? ([[Mace New Testament]])

	* [[1745 AD\|1745]] (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)		* [[1745 AD\|1745]] If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for under it the people received the law, what further need that another priest should rise after the order Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Mr. Whiston's Primitive New Testament)

	* [[1762 AD\|1762]] ([[King James Version]])		* [[1762 AD\|1762]] ([[King James Version]])

	* [[1769 AD\|1769]] ([[King James Version]] - [[Benjamin Blayney]])		* [[1769 AD\|1769]] If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? ([[King James Version]] - [[Benjamin Blayney]])

	* [[1770 AD\|1770]] (Worsley Version by John Worsley)		* [[1770 AD\|1770]] Now if perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law) what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not after the order of Aaron? (Worsley Version by John Worsley)

	* [[1790 AD\|1790]] (Wesley Version by John Wesley)		* [[1790 AD\|1790]] Now if perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what farther need was there that another priest should rise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Wesley Version by John Wesley)

	* [[1795 AD\|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)		* [[1795 AD\|1795]] If therefore there was perfection by the Levitical priesthood (for under that the people had the law given to them), what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)

	* [[1833 AD\|1833]] (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])		* [[1833 AD\|1833]] If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])

	* [[1835 AD\|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)		* [[1835 AD\|1835]] Moreover, if, indeed, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood, (for with it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should arise, according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)

	* [[1849 AD\|1849]] ([[Etheridge Translation]] by [[John Etheridge]])		* [[1849 AD\|1849]] If, therefore, Perfection were to be through the priesthood of the Levoyee, by which the law has been put upon the people, why was there another Priest required, who should arise in the resemblance of Malki-Zedek? For he had said, In the likeness of Aharun he shall be. ([[Etheridge Translation]] by [[John Etheridge]])

	* [[1850 AD\|1850]] ([[King James Version]] by Committee)		* [[1850 AD\|1850]] ([[King James Version]] by Committee)
Line 135:		Line 135:
	* [[1855 AD\|1855]] [[Calvin Bible]] by the [[Calvin Translation Society]]		* [[1855 AD\|1855]] [[Calvin Bible]] by the [[Calvin Translation Society]]

	* [[1858 AD\|1858]] (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by [[Leicester Sawyer]])		* [[1858 AD\|1858]] If therefore there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood,--for the people received the law under it,--what need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec and not to be called after the order of Aaron? (The New Testament Translated from the Original Greek by [[Leicester Sawyer]])

	* [[1865 AD\|1865]] ([[The Emphatic Diaglott]] by [[Benjamin Wilson]])		* [[1865 AD\|1865]] If indeed then perfection through the Levitical priesthood was; (the people for with her law had received;) what yet need, according to the order of Melchizedek another to arise a priest, and not according to the order of Aaron to be named? ([[The Emphatic Diaglott]] by [[Benjamin Wilson]])

	* [[1865 AD\|1865]] (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)		* [[1865 AD\|1865]] If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there that a different priest should arise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (The New Testament of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ 1865 by American Bible Union)

	* [[1869 AD\|1869]] (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)		* [[1869 AD\|1869]] If indeed perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people hath received the Law,) what further need was there that a different priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called alter the order of Aaron? (Noyes Translation by George Noyes)

	* [[1873 AD\|1873]] ([[King James Version]]) by [[Frederick Scrivener]])		* [[1873 AD\|1873]] If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? ([[King James Version]]) by [[Frederick Scrivener]])

	* [[1885 AD\|1885]] (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)		* [[1885 AD\|1885]] Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need [was there] that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? (Revised Version also called English Revised Version - Charles Ellicott editor)

	* [[1890 AD\|1890]] (Darby Version 1890 by [[John Darby]])		* [[1890 AD\|1890]] If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with it, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron? (Darby Version 1890 by [[John Darby]])

	* [[1898 AD\|1898]] ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])		* [[1898 AD\|1898]] If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood -- for the people under it had received law -- what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron? ([[Young's Literal Translation]] by [[Robert Young]])

	* [[1901 AD\|1901]] ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])		* [[1901 AD\|1901]] Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need `was there' that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? ([[American Standard Version]] - [[Philip Schaff]])

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] If indeed, therefore, there had been, a perfecting through means of the Levitical priesthood,––for, the people, thereon, have had based a code of laws, what further need, according to the rank of Melchizedek, for a different priest to be raised up, and, not according to the rank of Aaron, to be designated? (The Emphasised Bible Rotherham Version)

	* [[1902 AD\|1902]] (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)		* [[1902 AD\|1902]] Then indeed if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for unto it the people have been tithed, what need is there still that another priest shall rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? (Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by William Godbey)

	* [[1904 AD\|1904]] (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by [[Adolphus Worrell]])		* [[1904 AD\|1904]] If, therefore, there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there, that another Priest should arise according to the rank of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned according to the rank of Aaron? (The New Testament: Revised and Translated by [[Adolphus Worrell]])

	* [[1904 AD\|1904]] (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)		* [[1904 AD\|1904]] If, then, Perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood—and it was under this priesthood that the people received the Law—why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron? (Twentieth Century New Testament by Ernest Malan and Mary Higgs)

	* [[1911 AD\|1911]] (Syrus Scofield)		* [[1911 AD\|1911]] (Syrus Scofield)

	* [[1912 AD\|1912]] (Weymouth New Testament)		* [[1912 AD\|1912]] Now if the crowning blessing was attainable by means of the Levitical priesthood—for as resting on this foundation the people received the Law, to which they are still subject— what further need was there for a Priest of a different kind to be raised up belonging to the order of Melchizedek instead of being said to belong to the order of Aaron? (Weymouth New Testament)

	* [[1918 AD\|1918]] (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)		* [[1918 AD\|1918]] If indeed, then, perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for upon it the people received the law, what further need that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? (The New Testament Translated from the Sinaitic Manuscript by Henry Anderson)

	* [[1923 AD\|1923]] (Edgar Goodspeed)		* [[1923 AD\|1923]] (Edgar Goodspeed)