George Ricker Berry - Revision history

KJV: Template:Donate

2019-05-20T05:11:36Z

Template:Donate

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 20 May 2019
Line 36:		Line 36:
	* [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&num=10&q=site%3Ainternationalstandardbible.com+%22George+Ricker+Berry%22 7 articles by Berry] in [[International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]]		* [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&num=10&q=site%3Ainternationalstandardbible.com+%22George+Ricker+Berry%22 7 articles by Berry] in [[International Standard Bible Encyclopedia]]


			{{Donate}}

	{{DEFAULTSORT:Berry, George Ricker}}		{{DEFAULTSORT:Berry, George Ricker}}

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T12:04:28Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 25 January 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.		Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.

	The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.		The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes.

			Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus, and studied it for 25 years.

	:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible." (Thomas Newberry Bibles)		:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible." (Thomas Newberry Bibles)

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T12:03:15Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 25 January 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.		The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.

	:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible." (Thomas Newberry Bibles ~~http://www.newblehome.co.uk/newberry/bible.html~~)		:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible." (Thomas Newberry Bibles)

	==Written works==		==Written works==

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T12:02:48Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 25 January 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.		The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.

	:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible."		:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible." (Thomas Newberry Bibles http://www.newblehome.co.uk/newberry/bible.html)

	==Written works==		==Written works==

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T12:00:26Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 25 January 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.		Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.

	The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes.		The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes. Newberry revered Codex Sinaiticus.

			:Evidence of his minute attention to the sacred text lies before me as I write, in a beautiful copy of Tischendorf's transcription of the New Testament according to the Codex Sinaiticus, presented to him by friends in London in 1863, which is annotated throughout in his neat handwriting. It was after twenty-five years devoted to such study that he conceived the plan of putting its fruits at the disposal of his fellow-Christians in The Newberry Study Bible."

	==Written works==		==Written works==

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T11:58:52Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:58, 25 January 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.		Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.

	The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza.		The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza. Newberry's collated six critical Greek texts which are referred to in his marginal notes.

	==Written works==		==Written works==

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T11:52:16Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 25 January 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

	Although called the George Ricker Berry Greek to English Interlinear, Berry's Interlinear was compiled by [[Thomas Newberry]]. [[[[Thomas Newberr\|Newberry]] regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:		Although called the George Ricker Berry Greek to English Interlinear, Berry's Interlinear was compiled by [[Thomas Newberry]]. G. R. Berry wrote only the Greek-English New Testament Lexicon and the New Testament Synonyms found at the back of the Greek to English Interlinear that bears his name. [[Thomas Newberr\|Newberry]] regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:

	:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]		:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T11:51:01Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:51, 25 January 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

	Berry's Interlinear was compiled by [[Thomas Newberry]] ~~who~~ regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:		Although called the George Ricker Berry Greek to English Interlinear, Berry's Interlinear was compiled by [[Thomas Newberry]]. [[[[Thomas Newberr\|Newberry]] regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:

	:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]		:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T11:47:20Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 25 January 2015
Line 9:		Line 9:
	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

	Berry's Interlinear was compiled by Thomas Newberry who regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:		Berry's Interlinear was compiled by [[Thomas Newberry]] who regarded the Received Text as "faulty" and represented the KJV as having many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in renderings:

	:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]		:The Revised Version.— This is the result of repeated expressions of dissatisfaction with the Authorised Version, repeated attempts to amend it, and repeated calls for its revision, on account of the faulty state of the original text it proceeded upon, the comparatively defective knowledge of the original languages on the part of the translators, and the proved presence of many inaccuracies, errors, and obscurities in the renderings. [Bold emphasis added]
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.		Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.

			The interlinear uses the [[1550 AD\|1550]] Greek text of Stephanus, and not the [[1598 AD\|1598]] of Beza.

	==Written works==		==Written works==

Nick: /* Interlinear */

2015-01-25T11:43:48Z

Interlinear

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:43, 25 January 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:
	(Quoted from The Newberry Reference Bible, Portable Edition, pg. 945)		(Quoted from The Newberry Reference Bible, Portable Edition, pg. 945)

	Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James ~~1611!~~		Why would Thomas Newberry, a Plymouth Brethren leader, who like John Darby, regarded the Textus Receptus to be inferior to the critical Greek Text, translate the Received Text into English? The answer is obvious: to attempt to discredit the King James Version and cause people to accept corrupt modern definitions as true.

	~~It is no longer a mystery why the George Ricker Berry Interlinear reads like a MODERN VERSION in many places~~.

	==Written works==		==Written works==