Dynamic Equivalency - Revision history

Beza 1598 at 08:29, 17 March 2016

2016-03-17T08:29:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 17 March 2016
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.		The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.

			{{Donate}}

2009-08-01T09:46:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 1 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Dynamic Equivalence (also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.), differing from [[Formal Equivalence]] which to renders the text word-for-word. The two approaches represent emphasis, respectively, on readability and on literal fidelity to the source text. Broadly, the two represent a spectrum of translation approaches.~~[1]~~		Dynamic Equivalence (also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.), differing from [[Formal Equivalence]] which to renders the text word-for-word. The two approaches represent emphasis, respectively, on readability and on literal fidelity to the source text. Broadly, the two represent a spectrum of translation approaches.

	The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.		The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.

2009-04-02T12:18:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 2 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Dynamic Equivalency.~~		Dynamic Equivalence (also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.), differing from [[Formal Equivalence]] which to renders the text word-for-word. The two approaches represent emphasis, respectively, on readability and on literal fidelity to the source text. Broadly, the two represent a spectrum of translation approaches.[1]

	Dynamic Equivalence(also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.), differing from [[Formal Equivalence]] which to renders the text word-for-word. The two approaches represent emphasis, respectively, on readability and on literal fidelity to the source text. Broadly, the two represent a spectrum of translation approaches.[1]

	The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.		The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.

2008-11-06T11:57:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 6 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Dynamic Equivalency.		Dynamic Equivalency.

			Dynamic Equivalence(also known as functional equivalence) attempts to convey the thought expressed in a source text (if necessary, at the expense of literalness, original word order, the source text's grammatical voice, etc.), differing from [[Formal Equivalence]] which to renders the text word-for-word. The two approaches represent emphasis, respectively, on readability and on literal fidelity to the source text. Broadly, the two represent a spectrum of translation approaches.[1]

			The terms "dynamic equivalence" and "formal equivalence" are associated with the translator [[Eugene Nida]], and were originally coined to describe ways of translating the Bible.

2008-11-06T11:54:57Z

Protected "Dynamic Equivalency" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:54, 6 November 2008
(No difference)

2008-10-16T12:07:01Z

New page: Dynamic Equivalency.

New page

Dynamic Equivalency.